94-1303 ORIGINAL Council File # C l t i — \ 3
RESOLUTION Green Sheet # 28525
ITY OF S INT PAUL, MINNESOTA a5
Presented By __ - >A I
Referred To Committee: Date
WHEREAS, in 1994 the assessment ra,e for street paving, including curb and gutter, in connection
with the Combined Sewer Separation • rogram (CSSP) was $21.88 per assessable foot; and
WHEREAS, in 1994 the assessment r- e for storm sewer in connection with CSSP was 3.45 cents
i
per square foot for 1, 2 and 3 family d - Ilings, and 8.64 cents per square foot for all other types of
property; and
WHEREAS, in 1994 the assessment r - e for the modified lantern style lighting was $3.87 per
assessable foot, and the alternative be i t straw lighting was $2.43 per assessable foot and
WHEREAS, in 1994 the assessment r. e for sidewalk reconstruction of five foot wide sidewalks for
1, 2 and 3 family dwellings was $6.84 .er assessable foot; and
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul City Counc � , by resolution, has directed that these assessment rates be
adjusted yearly, based on the Minnea.olis -Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index; and
WHEREAS, the most recent Minneap•lis -Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an
increase of 2.9% from the first half of 1 -93 (138.5) to the first half of 1994 (142.5); NOW
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that in order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and
benefit to the proprty owners, the ass- sment rate for street paving in connection with CSSP
Program is increased 2.9% from $21. :: per assessable foot to $22.51 per assessable foot for all
such CSSP projects approved by Fina Order after October 1, 1994 to be constructed in 1995; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Issessment rate for storm sewer separation is increased
2.9% from 3.45 cents per square foot t• 3.55 cents per square foot for all 1, 2 and 3 family
properties; and from 8.64 cents per sq are foot to 8.89 cents per square foot for all other types of
properties for such projects approved , y Final Order after October 1, 1994 to be constructed in
1995; and
III
cm— l3co
ORIGINAL
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the a" rate for the modified lantern style lighting is
increased 2.9% from $3.87 to $3.98 per assessable foot, and the alternative bent straw lighting is
increased 2.9% from $2.43 to $2.50 per assessable foot for such projects approved by Final Order
after October 1, 1994 to be constructed n 1995, and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the as- essment rate for reconstruction of five foot wide sidewalks is
increased 2.9% from $6.84 to $7.04 per assessable foot for 1, 2 and 3 family properties for such
projects approved by Final Order after 1 ctober 1, 1994 to be constructed in 1995.
Yeas Nays Ab e nt Requested by Department of:
Blakey
—�-
Grimm Public Works PAS 8-15-94
Guerin
Harris
Mega ra 14V--)
• i b u nTfi�- BY: ( }
Ihune -
Z
Adopted by Council: Date l c l 1 Form Ap ved by City / Attorney
Adoption Certified by Council Secreta y By: \ \\ •' --
` • Approv_d • ay-r for Submission to
L G ` Council
Approved by Mayo ' Date
By:
By:
6 14 -( 3
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL " ED GREEN SHEET N 0 „ 28525
Public Works Department ' g4 I INrri uDATE INITIAL/DOE
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE - — _ CITY COUNC�
Thomas Kuhfeld (266 -6111) / T , ASS/6” FOR CA ctTv ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) II ROUTING MI BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. _
K j MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT)
s
I TOTAL • OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLAP ALL LOCATIONS FOR (IMMATURE) p 5 AL r.• T
- �
ACTION REQUESTED tf ■)
Approval of resolutn establishing the 1995 Combined Sewer and Street Program assessment rates.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Neer (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSION __ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISS�t 1. Has this persoMkm ever worked under a contract for this departrnent?
YES NO
�?
CM COMMITTEE 2. Has this persoN a city ever been employ
STAFF YES NO
S. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city
_
DISTRICT COUNCIL employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheaf
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WRERE, MY):
In 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each year accordingo
the previous years change in the Minneapolis -Sain Paul Urban Consumer Price Index (90- 1459). In addition, in 1992, they adopted
a similar resolution dealing with reconstruction of lidewalks (92 -146). Accordingly, the attached resoUution increases the 1994
assessments 2.9% for 1995. RECEIVED
See attached for history of assessment rate increases.
AUG22
ADVANTAGES F APPROVED:
CITY ATTORNEY
Assessments will keep pace with inflation. We wil be able to do slightly more paving of old oiled streets. RECEIVED
AUG 2 3
IYOR'S OFF 1994 C
DISADVANTAGES F APPROVED
Assessments will be 2.9% higher for residents.
Council Research Center
AUG 2 4 1994
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
We will be able to do Tess paving of old oiled streets.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACrTVITY NUMBER 4
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
t
c r L t — \
Y
3 4 E o)ovv
W 2 _ M O CO O
C CJ O do O I•
ca
in
4 O N O M et CA
O o O C) IUD CO
n I• CO CO CO CO
O O O O O O
CC 1 O O O O O O
a fA A 49 to d'? 49
W
Cl) CI CI 10 In
O r N C) d' IA
O [+I C) C7 M C) C) C)
�j 0 0 0 0 0 0
CC
CC D-
•
aL
O O - et C) O
CA J O W N C) et I)
gC N CN N N N N
W a FA ni ! 49- 49 fA 69-
M
Z
Z r O O r co h co
O Z In V) to N. co O
J J
C) C) C) C) C) C)
W 69- H} 49- d} 69 d}
a
m
O N d O CO '-
i Z Z O cD �t CO to + .:
Q J 1- r N N N N (5 CA
8 . El 69.MP � UP- 49 CO
4 d6
W 1 c'
e e at at at ; at e
P) _ et M CO coma) to
CO
c.) ° O d C) N C) N � c
Q)
L.
u .
Q O co 1- O N to CO IA V et CA d O
t
S CO C CO ch O ..• 10 0 — 2
p O O r r N N Cl C) co CO ch
Z d O)
J rr 0
et co le 6 VI ..
Z Q r- tg M O so a P 0 t •C
Q
th
a ° V
20 as .= •
W
N a d ' N 0) ti C) Io et c0 Ill IO
J LU = I!7 o o to O O a C! CO N 1- O
i _ O O O r N N Cr C) C) et C) w i
Q co t
a s r- l I .. S co
• CC dS o) .1.
r _ W E • c M r
It) (o h CO O) O r• N C) et O CS O
CO woo CO CI) O CI) Cq C) O) C) C5
N 6 O) 0) C) CI) a) 0) O 0) O) 0) a) d \ N
6 — N
V u +a U