94-1264 ORIGINAL Council File # ( 7`/ - /%49y 1
Green Sheet # 27673
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By 0
Referred To ) Committee: Date
I ,I RESOLVED: That the Off Sale Liquo= License (I.D. #58841) currently held by The Mao
Family Corp DBA Wolter 3rothers Pharmacy & Liquor at 438 W. University Avenue
be and the same is here _py renewed.
Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays A
Blakey ✓
Grimm ,i Office of License, Inspections and
Guerin ---7' Environmental Protection
Harris v
Me /
`
Reitman t �—
Thune '�— l �w'
By:
Adopted by C unci,, �� ` ` ? ( -1
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adotion Certi'i <• ouncil Secretary
By: 4tit . ',1' 7/b3'l9`{
Approved; May y: Da, r
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
By:
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE,COUNCIL DAFE INITIATED I N2 2 7 6 ' 3 I
LIEP /Licensing GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE ED DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR INITIAL/DATE ❑ CITY COUNCIL 7� U s 4 ,4... < t
Christine Rozek /266 -9114 &MGM FOR ❑CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK <
NEMER MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) � � 0 BUDGET DIRECTOR 12:1 FIN. &MGT. SERVICES OWL y
CONSENT AGENDA
ED MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 0
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
(CLAP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SHONATURE}
ACTION REQUESTED: ' 1
Renewal of an Off Sale Liquor Licens( (I.D. #58841)
i
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ _ PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION I. Has this person/firm ever Worked Under a contract for this department? f. f.
CIS COMMITTEE YES NO
STAFF 1 . Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
YES NO"
DISTRICT COURT I. )mss this
person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any cunent city ettolayser?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO t
Explain all yes answers an separate sheet and attach to groan shoot
i
- INITIATING FROSLEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whet, When, Where, Wh ):
The Mao Family Corp DBA Wolter Brothcrs Pharmacy & Liquor requests Council approval of t
renewal of the Off Sale Liquor License at 438 W. University Avenue. Phil Byrne and :t
Robert Kessler have reviewed the application and have agreed that the LIEP Office may no
forward it to the Saint Paul City Council. The LIEP Office's recommendation is for .}
approval.
R ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: eE R L
RUG 15 Council Research Center : f ev
) A UG 15 1994
f
i
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: i
1 " e
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
If Council approval is not received, applicant will be scheduled for a review before a
hearing officer.
1 -
T ,
TOTAL AMOUNTOF TRANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER I'
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
s$,.