94-1222 3g
OFUGNAL � - � a a�
CO" , y $H' .�
CITY OF ST. PAUL
Si BY `�� 1$709
PRELIMINARY OLD ; FI HO.
VOTING WAD ,
f or the ope ation of the Above Standard Street Lighting
In the Matter of Pro ect from January thru
System for the City Hall —Cour House Streetscape
December, 1995.
I
The Council of the City
of Saint Paul having received the report f the
hereby
Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report,
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives
and that the estimated cost thereof is $2,600.
financed by
assessments only.
_
12th_
he
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on t he Counc
Chambers of the City
of October, 1994_, at 3:30 o clock P.M., in the City of
day Hall and Court House Building
Chambers
Saint Paul.
given to the persons and
3. That notice of said public hearing be g in
place in
the manner p
rovieed by the Charter, stating the time and p
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated. ����
Adopted by Council: Date AUG 2
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays Cert - 'ied Pas; ' ', Council Secretary
•/ Blakey '
g/ Grimm
A'' Guerin
d Harris Z_In Favor B
4/ Megard Against Mayor
,/ Thune ttman PIIAI c.
T p mnwn
SEP 10 1994 SEP 17 1994
�.
7 r ' ran -�.
Public Hearing Date - October 12, 199 RE 8 -16 -94 1,..4,4:
No 3_2 2 3
Fina x. •r. - . T ,ar Il. 16 -94
GREEN SHEET
r tin n /Real Estate INrnAUDATE mQ lcIL
Finance D ❑ oepgp NT DIRECTOR c
❑ CITY CLERK
.�. - -.. _. & i i N CITY ATTORNEY
❑ BUDGET DIRECTOR ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. g . - . . . I 4 266 -8859 ER FOR ❑
' pQ f ii [I - S�n�utCil `
IINININIM
e r Y �. n BY i • arc ! - no
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CU ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
I ACTION REQUESTED:
Setting date of public hearing
estimated operating costs fo the City Hall /Court Hou se Nore18709pe Area Above
Approve esti Lighting Project f. 1995.
Standard Street Lg g
R E RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
Approve (A) or ROW l 1 alder. a centred tor This department? 1. RE . Has this person/firm ever worked
pV►NNNI(i COMMISSION .. C1YA SERVICE Q�MMISSK�'I YES •�
CIB COMMITTEE H as thie person/firm ever been a city employ?
STAFF 17= 8- 15- 16- 14 -4 -3 -7 YES NO a normally by any currern oily Counc ils s • this person/firm
SUPPORTS DISTRICT WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Ward 2 NO
Explain all y� answers on separate and attach to green sheet
Safer and Better Neighborhoods In each cas
� SBUL OPPQ UTArr (Wh , When. , ) lighting systems. INITIATING M, was held for each ., the above- standard lig
A public hearing 'business: ,associations, props. y
from various neighbor .od district councils, siatins, their
after handing ro ed both the construction of these syste. s
eandnt their
geld
owner
peration, ytt the City Council app e
operation by the City on an assessor nt basis. It is required that a P
P own system al in 1983. costs sy gems
both the estimated op rating costs and then actual operating costs•
first year e-S bo syste began with the Lowe
first above- standard lighting y per year since then.
have increased at a rate of about 2 systems p y 4 ..
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: olicy originated to allow he
p..cedure. The assessment i
F te dit o a ll w .ferm4•
This has become an annual to pa i . r the additional operating costs and p
direct benefitting parties to pay
maintenance of the system.
z
I
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: c R Center ,
None
AUG 1 6 1994
DISADVANTAGES WNOTAPPROVED• bear t Se added expense to operate these systems instead of the
The City as a whole, would quested them. '
direct benefitting parties that q
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION i
2 600.40 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES N
Assessments only ACTIVITY NUMBER
FUNDING SOURCE ublic hearing and charges.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
1 property owners w 11 receive notice of the p