Loading...
94-1135 flGINAL L /z /i City of St. Paul COUNC FILE 0. g RESOLUTION APPROVING ASE ESSM ENT AND B / .iL%e FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON ' - 'le No. S9375 Voting Assessment No. 3871 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 5 Reconstruction of sidewa_k on Both sides Como Place from Front Ave. to Hatch Ave. Preliminary Order 93 -1060 approved July 27, 1993 Final Order 93 -1278 approved August 31, 1993 The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment b , and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 5th day of October, 1994, at 3:30 P.M. , :., , e •C • ! t ' t,. ., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. PURIM fl COUNCILPERSON SEP e� , 994 by the Council: Date \(:)1 1I q 4 Yeas/ Nays e7 ►►// B),akey Certified by Council Secretary Ll;imm ier (/G}erin In 'avor �■ • .i...._ • / l iar , • ✓H ris /MAW f �i / A: and 0 pg. nst tman �' " hu ne Mayor Public Hearing Date - October'' 5, 1994 RE 7 -29 -94 FMS - Real Estate Division t ate: 7 -26 -94 Green Sheet Number. 32022 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL Contact Person and Phone Number „ CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Peter White 266 -8850 m. BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SVC. DIR. MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research Must be on Council Agenda by. 8 -10 -94 Must be in Council Research Office no later than noon Monday 8 -8 -94 TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL • CATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) AcnoN REQUESTED: Setting date of public hear ng of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk reconstruction on COMO PLACE. File No. S9375 Assessment No. 3871 RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) P RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING: _ PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF 1. Has the person /firm cvcr worked under a contract for this department? YES NO _CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ 2. Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES NO _ CIB COMMITTEE _ 3. I Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any Current City employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECI:TVE? Neighborhoods — ' .lain all YES answers on a separate shcct and attach. COUNCIL WARD(S): 5 District Planning Council: 6 INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, hen, Where, Why): Project is completed. Ratification is necessa in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the project. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Same as above. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not assess the benefits would be inconsist nt with City policy. Total Amount of Transaction $ 1.656.88 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO $ 1,320.27 P • 1993 $ 336.61 Ass ssments Council .. Nardi Center Funding Source Activity umber JUL 2 8 1994 Financial Information: (Explain) 4 property owners will be not fied of the public hearing and charges.