94-1133 ORIGINA'L LL Ja
City of St. Paul COUNCIL FI E NO. VW-
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND 'y� G ff //-L
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON S9359
i File No.
Voting Assessment No. 3867
Ward In the matter of the assessment of bent fits, cost and expenses for
3 Reconstruction of sidewalk on Both sides Susan Avenue from
St. Paul Ave. to Colettle P1.
Preliminary Order 93 - 816 approved June 15, 1993
Final Order 93 - 1075 approved July 27, 1993
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been
submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment x and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public h Faring be had on said assessment on the 5th day of
October, 1994, at 3:30 P.M. , _ _ _ . _ _ _ • ., in the Council Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall Building, in the C ty of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
DIIRIMerl
COUNCILPERSON SEP 3 1994 Adopted by the Council: Date '\I�-r _ 1 l C k 4
Yeas Nays
VBlakey Certifie d by Council Secretary
(/G 116, 4
VGyierin r l, In Favor By AIL • :... AW ..._. . NEW • - -
ris /
and n AI ainst
, i
e t tman Mayor
ne
Public Hearing Date - October 5, 1994 RE 7-29-94
FRS - Real Estate Division Date: 7 -26 -94 Green Sheet Number. 32020
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
Contact Person and Phone Number. `"
CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
Peter White . 266 -8850 ; < BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SVC. DIR. MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research
Must be onCouncilAgenda by: 8 -10 -94 Must be in Ccuncil Research Office no later than noon Monday 8 -8 -94
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Acr1oN REQUESTED: Setting date of public hear'ng of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
reconstruction on SUSAN AVENUE.
File No. 59359 Assessment No. 3867
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) PIRSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF 1. Has the person /firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ 2. Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
_ CLB COMMITTEE _ 3. Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
Current City employee? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Neighborhoods
F.Yplain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
COUNCIL WARD(S): 3 District Planning Council: 15
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, ,'hen, Where, Why):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
•
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
•
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Total Amount of Transaction $ 2.148.31 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 1,389.18 PIA 1993
$ 759.13 Assessments Coma Research Center
Funding Source Activity Number JUL 2 8 1994 •
Financial Information: (Explain)
6 property owners will be notL.fied of the public hearing and charges.
•