94-1125 1
(4
CITY OF ST. PAUL COyNCIL FILE N0.
FINAL ORDER 11 `
File N o. _ S94100
Voting Ward 6
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on both sides East Nebraska Avenue from Greenbrier Street to Weide Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or :hree family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI— RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square loot.
under Preliminary Order c\ & approved t�. 8 1q9
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above — described improvement be made, and the proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Dateagek3; I' p lit
Yeas Nays a I
V Blakey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
Grimm
1 / Guerin
Harris lin Favor esz3k:„BY I/ Megard
�Rettman � Against
V Thune Mayor
1
I
Public Heariig Date — August 3, 1994 RE 5 -27 -94 V Alk 208
r DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL . TE II MATED GREEN SHEET N 0 . C O
Public Works Sidewalks "-10-9 INITIAUDATE INITIAUD E
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL •
Thomas P. Keefe - 266 -6121 NUMBER FOR CITY ATTORNEY D CITY CLERK
MUST BE ON COMM. AGENDA BY (DATE) 6 -15 -94 ROUTING BUDGET DIRECTOR 8 FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
ice ORDER 0 MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) t Council Res- � 1
TOTAL! OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CU AU. LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) 0 ASSOCIATE 0 DEP t LACCOUNT , )
ACTION REOUESTED r 5 . 11 r
Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6 (See attached list)
MCI AA :1 .S /00 ...
q (t ..
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (Ft) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIO 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
YES NO
_ CM COMMITTEE 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
A STAFF YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL — S' 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city
employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate shat and attach to green sheet
wJMD b
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN, WHtE. WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created becalse of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left tncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewai k reconstructions have cre tied negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmen.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmenes, and despite the fact up to one -half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. COurell Regard! Center
MAY 2 7 1994 _ ,
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidew tlk stock to deteriorate, which in turitlyinerreratermorer personal injrhy suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dol sr amounts in eventual repairs and /or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
.
1
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 33, 331 COST /REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) NO 4Ef{
FUNDING SOURCE 94 -M -0663 A. PIA 94 14 495 .000 ACITVITY NUMBER C94 009
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B. AST =. 400,000
C. CIB 94 21 50,000
SUMMARY OF E GINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS (?L I
- 11 L 5
Ward 6
S9y /00 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT .IDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA AVE. from
_ Greenbrier St. to Weide St.
INITIATING ACTION: This orde was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of fo r (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Thi walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled, settled, spalled a d cracked panels.
S / 0 / PROJECT: CONSTRUCT . R CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. NEBRASKA
AVE. from Weide St. to Arcade
INITIATING ACTION: This orde as initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of f. r 4) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Thi-lwalk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, disintegrated, scaled, set lIed and cracked panels.
•
G RIGINAL
,
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. � ----
PRELIMINARY ORDER By ��.(.( / '
File lio. S94100
Voting Ward 6
In the Matter of Sidewalk recon•truction at the following location(s):
on both sides East Nebraska Ave ue from Greenbrier Street to Weide Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or hree family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of •ld sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8..2 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% , f the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square oot.
All corner residential properti;.s will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed si•ewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON— RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square oot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, .nd having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and tha the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated constru tion rates, financed by assessments and
1994 Public Improveme t Aid.
2. That a public hearing .e had on said improvement on the 3rd_ day
of August 1994 , .t 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint
Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided b. the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature o the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: DateI _g
Yeas / Nays
akey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
imm
erin
arris 1 In avor By Ilk • �� �_,,_
, J gard
ttman 0 Aga nst
hune Mayor
+� C ITY p.b Saint P. ul City Council • l
9 l
Public nearing Notice
" " Irf► a� Public xmpr il vexnent Construction
L
�C
I %% % Q
OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT #6
PLANNING COUNCIL #05
.......... ...............................
......... ...............................
FILE # S94100
PROPERTY ADDRESS
.......................
........................
......................
........................
.......................
........................
......................
........................
........................
PARCEL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
THE TIME: WEDNESD Y, AUGUST 3, 1994 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Co ncil Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House
HEARING Written or oral s latements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at t s hearing.
PURPOSE To consider app •val of the proposed project as follows:
Reconstruction of sidew Ik on both sides EAST NEBRASKA AVENUE from
Greenbrier Street to We se Street.
ESTIMATED If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the
ASSESSMENT cost will be ass ;ssed against the benefitted properties. The
INFORMATION ESTIMATED ass:ssment for the above property is $
THIS AMOUNT ILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME!
Please see PAY ENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this
notice and also he enclosure for additional project information.
ESTIMATED
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SID NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/15/94