94-1113 w P
ORIGIN AL .��.
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. 7X
- 7//1 , --3
FINAL ORDER B
y
Fi a o
4
�S 418 _
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on both sides Conway Street frd,m Cypress Street to Earl Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or :three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of ;old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.'22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will ba prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100 % of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL (More than thee family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidega1k; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square foot.
under Preliminary Order 1 approved �► -w� \S ��qy
I 1
The Council of the City cf Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, ther€,fore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Counci:, of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above — described improvement be made, and the proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That uton the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter. � np
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date '1
s U
Yea Nays �+
Blakey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
iGrimm
1./ Guerin ,_
arris �In :Favor s,
(� �r ���,� _�_ __
egard � / � /
V Rettman Against it/4- .,� //�11 /
Thune V Mayor
1
Public Hearing Date - August 3, 1994 RE 5 -27 -94 Y ,,
DEPARTMENTTOFFICE/COUNCI. DATE INITIATED GREEN SHEET V 0 . . � ��
' Public, Works Sidewalks 5 "10- INITIAUDATE INITI • TE _
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
Thomas P. Keefe -266 -6121 - CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
ti
41, ►• r BY ' 4 •— BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
ORDER MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) CoundI Res
TOTAL / OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) El ASSOCIATE III • ' • ENTAL A T i
ACTION REQUESTED
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 7 (See attached lilt)
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_
PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CM COMMITTEE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
. STAFF YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL w 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city
SUPPORTS WHKI COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
WJ
INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WIfRE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw.cycles,j
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temmarature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must ba
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left ' ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so 'r follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmen, and despite the fact up to one -half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. Cooed Research Center
MAY 2 7 1994
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wl)I geheraiMiere injury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dolkir amounts in eventual repairs and /or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 2 A s nAR " COST /REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDNGSOURCE 94•Ma0663 q. p tp 94 • 495,000 ACITVITY C94- 2T726 •27009
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) 0, AST • 400,000
C, CtB 94 • 50,000
•
■ 1
ORIGINAL
J +II f-) /1
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. / �'�j
PRELIMINARY ORDER By c, t r ,A.A.
File No. S9488
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconEtruction at the following location(s):
on both sides Conway Street from Cypress Street to Earl Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON— RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1994 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the _3rd_ day
of _August 1994 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint
Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date
Yeas Nays
akey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�imm
erin _
arris In Favor By ,� __� :_�.__
egard
ttman 0 Against
une Mayor
��w °ITy 0 � 9 , ff t Saint P. ul City Council yi
. �® .i 1 Public Hearing Notice
'' ttil!) lifiit
%% " "f i ii M1 It f Public Ixnpr 0 vexnent Construction (�
i °
C r & 5 4 .
OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT #7
PLANNING COUNCIL #04
.......... ...............................
FILE # .S9488
PROPERTY ADDRESS
............................................................................... ...............................
............ ...............................
PARCEL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
THE TIME: WEDNESD Y, AUGUST 3, 1994 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Co cil Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House
HEARING Written or oral s .tements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at th s hearing.
PURPOSE To consider appr • val of the proposed project as follows:
Reconstruction of sidew -Ik on both sides CONWAY STREET from Cypress Street
to Earl Street.
ESTIMATED If the City Counc I approves the project, all or part of the
ASSESSMENT cost will be asse .sed against the benefitted properties. The
INFORMATION ESTIMATED asse . sment for the above property is $.
THIS AMOUNT W LL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME!
Please see PAY ENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this
notice and also t e enclosure for additional project information.
ESTIMATED
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SID: NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/15/94
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Li
Ward 7
s'y 8ff PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT pIDEWALK B.S. CONWAY ST. from Cypress St. to
Earl St.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt
patches, disintegrated, scaled, setled and cracked panels.
S 9y8 PROJECT: RECONSTR■ T .IDEWL B.S. N. WINTHROP ST. from North
Park Dr. to Burns Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order .s initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of f. (4 omplaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS• his walk is pob -d concrete with heaves, offgrade,
asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels.