94-1112 VV-iN . 5j
CITY OF ST. PAUL CO trcILF LLNO 9
FINAL ORDER By y
File N#. S9487
totini Ward 2
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstr lowing location(s):
on the south side East W" street to Woodbury
Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIO, • 0
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, • • L >)
Reconstruction (replace. g co 1 er er front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk 0 D six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths New construction
(where no walk existed) nated to be
approximately $3.10 per a q�
All corner residential pr, up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstruct I NA the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI— RESIDENTIAL (More thi _wily structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed L uew'alk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square foot.
under Preliminary Order C V L \ - O 8'L-I approved A a.'a� \ \
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council kas heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above — described improvement be made, and the proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calc,ilate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date
Yeas Nays
Blakey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
Grimm
Guerin J
Harris In Favor By
Megard
Rettman Against
Thune Mayor
nt' t t1
C k
CITY OF ST. PAUL C - CIL F ' C Q C I L F L N '
FINAL ORDER
By ,1
1 File Np. S9487
} R�tig Ward 2
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on the south ale East Wyoming Street from Harvard Street to Woodbury
Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of 51d sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% 5f the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square toot.
All .corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of neiror reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property. `
MULTI— RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square :'oot.
under Preliminary Order 1 y - 8' Li approved
\`.►,� a a . 1 I-1
The Council of the of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, sue notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above — described improvement be made, and the y
proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calcu.ate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date
Yeas Nays
Blakey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
Grimm
Guerin
Harris In Favor By
Megard
Rettman Agai ist
Thune Mayor
Public Hearing Date - August 3, 1994 RE 5 -27 -94
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED i y �- \
GREEN SHEET I N o.
Public works Sidewalks s -10 -9a +
IN ITIAIJDATE INITI *ATE
CONTACT PERSON &PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
Thomas P. Keefe - 266 -6121 A Numee
� CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
MUST BE ON 6- - BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SERVICES
e ORDER
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Resiarch
TOTAL • OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (11UP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) $ ASSOCIATE 1111 r r TAL A C C TANT
ACTION REQUESTED �
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2 (See attached st)
u$ ,t/0. S 9y�"'7
RECOYMENDA S: Approve (A) or Reis° (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1
PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSDN 1. Has this person/ firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
A STAFF YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL — 3 3. Does this persorlflrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city
employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OMCTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
w4
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, W4ERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycle,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefttuncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pede trian injuries from fails and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project becau le it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so t follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
}
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have crested negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessme l t.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmers, and despite the fact up to one -half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
Coum:1 Renard, Center
MAY 2 7 1994
DISADVANTAGES F NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidew ilk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate -more personal injury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dol ar amounts in eventual repairs and /or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTIONS 1 • 6.74 OQ COST /REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) CEP NO
FUNDING SOURCE 94- 411 A PIA 94 Pk 495,000 ACITVITY C94'2T726 0784"K27009
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B, AST w 400,000
C, CIB 94 a 50,000
)
Fg
ORIGINAL 6s zgsa3 / 7
CITY OF ST. PAUL 6 _ IC I Pi Nom,
PRELIMINARY ORDER ;
,ile N.. S9487
Ward 2
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on the south side East Wyoming Street from Harvard Street to Woodbury
Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.72 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be, prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON — RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1994 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 3rd day
of August 1994 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint
Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Datey,
Yeas Nays
1/ilakey Certified Passed by Council Secretary
L'Crimm
I/C'u e r i n
v�farris 1 1 In Favor By 1\ 4
i.-1(e g a r d
✓lettman QAgainst
—Thune
Mayor
SUMMARY OF NGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 2
Sera t o PROJECT: W oo db ury St RECONSTRUCT! SIDEWALK S.S. E. WYOMING ST. from Harvard St.
INITIATING ACTION: This or. -r was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of • e (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Th s walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled
and cracked panels.
CITY °F s Saint P. ul City Council
a Public Hearing Notice
4441 s 1) Public Imp ovexnent Construction
1 8 54
OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT #2
PLANNING COUNCIL #03
FILE #
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PARCEL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
THE TIME: WEDNES I AY, AUGUST 3, 1994 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Co ncil Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall -Court House
HEARING Written or oral - tatements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at t is hearing.
PURPOSE To consider app oval of the proposed project as follows:
Reconstruction of side talk on the south side EAST WYOMING STREET from
Harvard Street to Woo. bury Street.
ESTIMATED If the City Coun iI approves the project, all or part of the
ASSESSMENT cost will be ass: ssed against the benefitted properties. The
INFORMATION ESTIMATED ass:ssment for the above property is $
THIS AMOUNT ILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME!
Please see PAY ENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this
notice and also he enclosure for additional project information.
ESTIMATED
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SID NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/15/94
-
. ,
. - 1
no-
,
0 i )4A-4
A ir 72 , ,_ -53 76 7-3 /1/?
2 ---e: i ?) 1 9' 9 y
4oLk. -1-.-p-
oaepai , 0 3
- , /-e-7 ( 12-4.472-e..
--, - i Jci 5 k 7
(-et-P-P-t-o--e, /' / e Jul I 2 1 1
a -C i / f/7 994
. ., .
,------- L..-eQ--0U° ‘,
)7-b-xt C 0--e-- o'-' ti '
4 ( /
i I-)
t
• _.9-a----1.9../
tri %1!0
t' ?
ez4 Zus14-1 - d ,
_A__$*t_ c,,,,
i
)
Ns- ---d-A--41-e--k., 0-,,, --., Y . .._ - u -0- ( ot .-'2-4-e--4--- i r• A-1-L--
1 6
,, .---e) 2 / ., 1 / 4- 71-6-77-
A---e-/Q- 11 • _ - '-‘i--e--Zi-uu-A-ek (721 p , , 0 , „ILA.) *
2
U L-9---/ / -C-W-- i
I----i
cifLe -.).-1. 04-p-09 „_,L.Ik., id / , ,,,,,_,,,u,„:„:1)„,, )1_,Q_Q_A
, J
NL. Lvt_ --P-A----,e,--1:-(12. r;A0 .A°
It j
.7p i.
) ,
f. (
, .
/
,
,
4 4 c
/ , ,
/ . A , ct ,
?
- , pez
J
1: ' . , ■//mi '
) . t
ARFCN
r-y
,, ,.. c...: ,
\'',...
--.._
- ....,
-- '".-..
- r,. ---
,-.-' Q
...,
,,, ,
\,....
,,\ 8 .......,
•4,... -...„... ,.
c .. ,..,
'
V.. '
,.._
.
4
,.....„ , ,
, ,_, — ------
.,)
- ,
to
W N
...I 0
...I ri
H LO
> La
ix W
D
P V) E
..“.D -
z ...,
D- H
E >-
. 3
0 N 1-41
IX 0 *IC
EN V)
41