94-1087 ORIGtNAL 1111
City of St. Paul •+ 1 • 1 J `i"
RESOLUTION APPROVING AS ESSMENT AND By
FIXING TIME OF HEARING HEREON • No. 938
Voting Assessment No. 3869
Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene its, cost and expenses for
2 Reconstruction of sidew.'lk on the west side of Main Street from
W. Sixth St. to W. Tent, St.
Preliminary Order 93 -1054 approved July 27, 1993
Final Order 93 -1284 approved August 31, 1993
The assessment of benefits, cost and e penses for and in connection with the above improvement having been
submitted to the Council, and the Council havi • considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment e and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public h aring be had on said assessment on the 21st day of
September, 1994, at 3:30 P.M. ., in the Council Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall Building, in the C ty of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said noti• the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
pn aiicucn ,
COUNCILPERSON A
ht 201994 Adopted by the Council: Date (l q ( p 4
Yeas Nays ` � —
i/Blakey Certify • Passed by Council Secretary
✓Grimm
% I Favor — ► —
EIarris WAVIISOWI
c-ilegard A .ainst
Rettman •A+ Mayor
Thune
637 --
Public Hearing Date - September 21, 1994 RE 7 -15 -94
FMS - Real Estate Division Date: 7 -11 -94 Green Sheet Number: 32014 = -
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
Contact Person and Phone Number. CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
souwats rat
Peter White 266 -8 0 BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SVC. DIR
S — MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research
Must be on Council Agenda by.8 -3 -94 Must be in Council Research Office no later than noon Monday 7 -25 -94
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED: Setting date of public hearing of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
reconstruction on MAIN STREET.
File No. 59382 Assessment No. 3869
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
_PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF 1. Has the person /firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ 1 Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
CID COMMITTEE 3. Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
Current City employee? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Neighborhoods
- explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
COUNCIL WARD(S): ri District Planning Council: 17
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Total Amount of Transaction $10,442.81 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 0.00 PIA 1993
$10,442.81 Assessments Council Research Center
Funding Source Activity Number JUL 14 1994
Financial Information: (Explain)
T _
1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and charges.