94-1086 ORIGINAL LL I/
City of St. Paul • a
� )
RESOLUTION APPROVING AS'ESSMENT AND By
FIXING TIME OF HEARING HEREON S9370
Voting Assessment No. 3860
Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene ts, cost and expenses for
2 Reconstruction of sidew.Ik on south side Summit Avenue from
S. Oxford St. to S. Lex* gton Parkway.
Preliminary Order 93 -993 approved July 15, 1993
Final Order 93 -1241 approved August 24, 1993
The assessment of benefits, cost and e penses for and in connection with the above improvement having been
submitted to the Council, and the Council havi I considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment , e and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public h aring be had on said assessment on the 21st day of
September, 1994, at 3:30 P.M. ;• ? ,. - $ s44'1 ., .0..0 ; -:., in the Council Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall Building, in the C ty of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said noti. - the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
jai ieucn � l 1 t
COUNCILPERSON p A dopted by the Council: Date
Yeas Nays 61(1/4— AU 20
lakey y
✓yrimm Certif ' assed by Council Secretary
'-'"Guerin P r
( W // I Favor B AIL
l/Harris /.."..... �� � AI.. �Megard NW ���
:ainst
i/Re t tman Mayor
Thune (7 1 I
Public Hearing Date - September 21, 1994 RE 7 -f5 -94
FMS - Real Estate Division Date: 7 -11 -94 Green Sheet Number. 32011
;:» »: »: > % »:: <' DEPART■ENT DIRECTOR QTY COUNCIL
Contact Person and Phone Number. `' { CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
moms ran
mums
Peter White 266 -885 BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SVC. DIR.
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research
Must be on Council Agenda by.8 -3 -94 Must be in Ccuncil Research Office no later than noon Monday 7 -25 -94
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALI. LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
AcrloN REQUESTED: Setting date of public hearing of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
reconstruction on SUMMIT AVENUE.
File No. S9370 Assessment No. 3860
J
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF . Has the person /firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ t. Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
cm CO1VI IITlEE _. Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
Current City employee? YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Neighborhoods
Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
COUNCIL WARD(S): 2 District Planning Council: 16
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Total Amount of Transaction $ 1.543.73 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 748.57 PIA 1993
$ 795.16 Assessments Council Research Center
Funding Source Activity Number JUL 14 1994
Financial Information: (Explain)
5 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.