94-1041 CRIGINAL r=
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO.
FINAL ORDER By `
-S X869 --
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on both sides East Fifth Street from North Hazel Street to North Ruth
Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square foot.
under Preliminary Order CA y — b $ approved M c� S ICIVA
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above — described improvement be made, and the proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date A cy
Yeas / Nays Pbt
B akey Certified Passed by Council S cretary
3rimm
erin
rris Co In Favor ByA .rl •
egard I�07
'� lT
v4ettman QAgainst 4� /
Thune Mayor
r abs
r
.104,ic Hearing Date - July 20, 19914 RE 5 -13 -94 — C�
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCL MTE INMATED GREEN SHEET N o . iti
Public Works Sidewalks 1-26-94 INITIAUDATE INrAUDAfrE
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR • CITY COUNCL
Thomas P. Keefe - 286 -6121 NUMBER FOR CITY ATTORNEY /11 CITY CLERK
ON COUNCL AGENDA BY —1— 4 ROWING BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. F5 MGT. SERVICES DIR.
ORDER
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) I Council F(
TOTAL # alt SIGNATURE PAWS 1 MO ALL LOCATIOfq FOR 81GNATiIRE) El ASSOCIATE
k n' atl ENTAL ACCOUNTANT
ACTION SEOUESTED "P b
Reconstruct Sidewak in Ward 7 (See attached list
F/1—.6 WO . S 9V ro
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Nod (Ft) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
— PLAWING COMMISSION _. — CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSW■ 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIS COMMITTEE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
A STAFF YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL-- 1 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCU. OBJECTIVE? employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to preen sheet
1 440 '7
INITIATWG PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN, WHME, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewak reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessment, and despite the fact up to one -half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial. Council Reseanth Center
MAY 16 1994
DISADVANTAGES F NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewl k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and /or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION = 5 t OQ COST /REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) 140
FUNDING SOURCE 9441T4663 A . PtA 94 Pt 495,000, ACITVITY C94 •0784- 27009
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B y AST w 400,000
C.
CM 94 1, 50,000
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Ward 7
S94/80 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT $IDEWALK B.S. E. FIFTH ST. from N. Hazel St. to
N. Ruth St.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of eight (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled and cracked panels.
3ry►a'/ PR • E T: RE • N - T - IDEWALK B.S. E. FIFTH ST. from N. Winthrop St.
to N. McKnight Rd.
INITIATING ACTION: This order w. • itiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of onje (1 s omplaint and an inspection of the wlak.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Thi$ alk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water
pockets, asphalt patches, settled . nd cracked panels.
s? yr PR • E T• - • ' • - D _ _ _ A B.S. MARGARET ST. from N. Winthrop
St. to N. McKnight Rd.
INITIATING ACTION: This ord- as i ' is ed by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of twiel 2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer
and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Thi . alk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, settled and cracked pan: s.
C , t PROJECT: RECONSTUCT SIDEWALK E.S. MOUNDS BLVD. from Cherry St. to
•T McLean Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This ord was ini • ted by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of fi e c plaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Thi$ w is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled and settled panels.
n GO
ORIGINAL (4 -�� ��}�
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. 9
PRELIMINARY ORDER By oJ,tnct'
File No. S9480
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on both sides East Fifth Street!f.rom North Hazel Street to North Ruth
Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) — $6.84 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nev construction
(where no walk existed) — 100% Of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.10 per square Hoot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI — RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON— RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.15 per square toot.
The Council of the City of Saint1Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1994 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 20th_ day
of July 1994 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint
Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature og the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date " L: 25
Yeas �' Nays A N -t
✓ Blakey �I Certified Passed by Council Secretary
Grimm
Guerin
✓H rris , In ,avor
./Regard
tman Q Aga.nst
—1hune Mayor