Loading...
94-1039 ORIGI � CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCI FILE NO 47 - to ,37 FINAL ORDER By \ -- " = c ; . File No. S9478 Voting Ward 6 In the Natter of Sidewalk recons ruction at the following location(s): on the south side East Ivy Avenu from Van Dyke Street to North Hazel Street at 1894 East Ivy Avenue o ly. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL 'RATES (One, two or t ree family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o d sidewalk) – $6.84 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.2 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) – 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.10 per square f ot. All corner residential propertie will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sid walk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI – RESIDENTIAL (More than thr a family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidew lk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.15 per square oot. is under Preliminary Order — _3 approved M ohs ` l% The Council of the Cit y of Saint Paul has conducted a"public hearing upon the above improvement, 'ue notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council h :s heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above – described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it • FURTHER RESOLVED, That up n the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calc late all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Coun it in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Da e / j „l g Yeas Nays ✓Blakey Cert'- e. Pass-. .y /� /unci Secretary Grimm l'' J (/Guerin PP ✓Harris ( In avor B ZiAllile i V (/Regard 'I���'" Rettman 0 Aga nst /� << �.,, i.,. ("lune o Mayor ■■• ■- _ trk 9 1 7 -/43 9 9 • Public Hearing Date - Jul .0, 1994 RE 5 -13 - g July �7 . DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED GREEN SHEET fe�TFJ i Public Works Sidewalks 4 -26 -94 INITIAL/DATE INITIAL DATE _ CONTACT PERSON & PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 ASSIGN a COY ATTORNEY D CITY CLERK NUMBER FOR ROUTING J BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 C oun C lt Resea TOTAL It QV SIGNATURE PAGES 1 - (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) El ASSOCIATE . d ' TMENTAL ACTION REQUESTED ♦ 4,a17, Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6 (See attached ha) r RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIOW 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? CIB COMMITTEE YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? A_ STAFF YES NO _ DISTRICT COUNCIL ,— 3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet 141g44, hp INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created beca use of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temparature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left I ncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES F APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one -h If tR he assess City subsidized, it stil remains controversial. (�{n( Center MAY 16 1994 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidews k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and /or replacement, as well as claim payouts. t TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 1 n , 92n no COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE 94 —M -0663 A. PIA 94 = 499,000 ACITVITY C94 -2T726 -0784 -27009 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B • AST = 400 000 C. CIB 94 = 50,000 • q/ y- /a37 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 6 S944►11 PR EJECT: RECONST CT -IDE • LK B.S. CASE AVE. from N. Ruth St. to Nokomis Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This or - as initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of e'• It (8) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: his wa ' soured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and racked panels. 5gy7g PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT IDEWALK S.S. E. IVY AVE. form Van Dyke St. to -N. Hazel St. at 1894 E. Ivy Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with one (1) mutli- cracked panel. PRO ECT: RECONSTRU , T S DEWALK N.S. E. MARYLAND AVE. from S9 y) 7 Edgewater Blvd. to N. McKnig RdL at 2 E. Maryland Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This ord. as initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a • -tition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION This 'walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches.