94-1021 Council File # 9
ORIGINA Green Sheet # o Q(3 V
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ae0
Presented By / /'' --
�Lj ' / ?��'Y
C am
Referred To Committee: Date
RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING GENERAL FUND MONEY FOR
1994 NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME PREVENTION GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council Resolution No. 93 -1865 adopted December 23, 1993, determined the
Neighborhood Crime Prevention Grants for 1994; and
WHEREAS, the General Fund monies to be used for the 1994 grants were in the 1993 City Budget; and
WHEREAS, the 1993 appropriation was unexpended and unencumbered because contracts were not
executed due to the fact that there was insufficient time to establish a contract relationship with the
subgrantees in 1993;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City hereby approves funding from the 1994 General
Fund for Neighborhood Crime Prevention Grants as outlined in Attachment A; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the following transfer be made in the 1994 City Budget:
FINANCING PLAN
001 General Fund
06000 -9830, Use of Fund Balance $100,000
SPENDING PLAN
001 General Fund
06000 -0547, Neighborhood Crime Prevention $100,000
Blake
y Nays Absent Requested by Department of:
Grimm ✓
Guerin ____
Harris �— P inl . Ec i.mic i-velo•ment
Me and — — / �W
Ke�tman �— � •
Thune ✓ ,�
/41 ( By: h1► `�
Adopted by Council: Certifed • 6 Secretar y :: to JUL 2 0 !994 1
Adopt'. ' �' Form Approved by City Attorney
By: _ � /i�i
C f ' -
Approved /
;or/ or: Date
Approve. b a u• is on ,
B Count � /
By: //g
R uo6&rr ol a,Ge� - oit
�� -2811
4 1 4
1 ,
' "I!
I
1 ? /
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N° 2 9 0 514
Planning & Economic Dement 6-3-94 GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE r INITIAIJDATE INITIAL/DAtE —
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR C] CITY COUNCIL
Bob Hammer, 2664693 i AS �i T -'S 9 4, J CITY CLE
._j CITY ATTORNEY 17 4--
MUST BE ON NCIL AGENDA Y (DATE) RpU i I - DGET DIRECTOR r 7 f ii � , qr. FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
NA ORDER i c. 6 MAYOR (OR ASSIST • Bob
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ' f
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Resolution to transfer funds for 1994 Crime Prevention grants.
t
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: f
_
MANNING COMMISSION — CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for thls department? f
PL
— CIS COMMITTEE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employs.?
— STAB YES NO
_ DISTRICT COURT 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current clty employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES , NO 4.
Explain ell yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet {
r
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whet, When, Where. Why):
I
(
The Neighborhood Crime Prevention Program Is on a funding cycle a monks primed is one fiscal year are odd
in the next fiscal year General Funds appropriated in 1993 reverted to the Fund • t it» d of 1993 and need till be
moved into the General Pond spending plan for 1994. / V r
JUG' 711
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
{
BUDGET OFF/CE
RECEIVED
The Clty will be able to provide Crime Prevention program funding to program recipients. JUN 7 1994
ti
CITY ATTORNE
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Council Research Center
i
None JUL. U 1 1y i
i
i
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
4
i
3
Funding would not be available for an approved program.
i
t i ftivtir ?
I
TOTAL. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 1100,000 • COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE [.nners1 Finaul ACTIVITY NUMBER (si.•60 )O.OS47
i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) j
i
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL • •
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO. 298- 4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency. 1. Deparbrnent Director
2. Department Director 2. Budget Director •
3. City Attomey 3. City Attorney
4. Mayor (for contracts over $15,000) 4. Mayor /Assistant
5. Human Rights (for contracts over $50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the #of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance, whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s) your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine thccityk liability fbt workers compensation claims, taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this project/action.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this project/request produce if it is passed (e.g., traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)? To Whom? When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? inability to deliver service? Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT -
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost? Who is going to pay?
ATTACHMENT A
1994 CRIME PREVENTION GRANT ALLOCATIONS
City Council Funding Source
ORGANIZATION Alloct'n CDBG IGEN FUND
1. Youth Express $10,000 $10,000
2. Teens Networking Together $19,700 $19,700
3. District 1 Community Council $12,500 $12,500
4. District 2 Community Council $18,000 $15,000 $ 3,000
5. Riverview Neighborhood Crime Watch $10,000 $10,000
6 Dayton's Bluff (4) Community Council $10,000 $ 3,000 $ 7,000
7. Payne Phalen District 5 Planning Council $18,000 $13,100 $ 4,900
8. District 6 Planning Council $18,000 $17,000 $ 1,000
9. District 7 Planning Council $10,000 $10,000
10 Thomas Dale Block Clubs Inc $10,000 $10,000
11. Ramsey Hill Association $5,000 $ 5,000
12. Summit University (8) Planning Council $18,000 $18,000
13. Hamline Midway Coalition (11) $ 8,000 $ 8,000
14. St Anthony Park (12) Community Council $ 9,000 $9,000
15. Snelling Hamline /Merriam Park Community Councils $16,000 $8,000 $ 8,000
16 Lexington Hamline Planning Council $10,000 $10,000
17. Macalester Groveland (14) Community Council $ 9,000 $9,000
18. Highland (15) Community Council $ 8,000 $ 8,000
19. Summit Hill Association (16) $ 4,000 $ 4,000
20. Downtown Community Development (17) Council $15,000 $15,000
21. University UNITED $10,000 $10,000
22. Aurora St Anthony Block Clubs $10,000 $10,000
23. Dayton's Bluff Boosters Club $10,000 $10,000
24. National Council of Negro Women $3,600 $3,600
25. Marshall Concordia Block Assn. $5,000 $ 5,000
26. Earmark for program evaluation $7,200 $ 7,200
27. Small Grants Set Aside $5,000 $5,000
TOTAL REQUESTS 289,000.00 189,000.00 100,000.00