The URL can be used to link to this page

95-1503 Council File # Green Sheet # \394 ro 7 RESOLUTION 'CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA .Ztd Presented By ; Referred To Committee: Date 1 WHEREAS, A contract for water service between the City of Mendota Heights and the Board . 2 of Water Commissioners dated the 14th day of September 1962, provides for a retail agreement 3 to supply water to Mendota Heights; and 4 5 WHEREAS, Terms and conditions of a new contract for water service between the City of 6 Mendota Heights and the Board have been negotiated to the satisfaction of the two parties and 7 Mendota Heights has submitted a signed contract for final approval by the City of Saint Paul and 8 the Board; and 9 10 WHEREAS, Officers of the Board of Water Commissioners have signed said contract for water 11 service as directed by Resolution No. 4392; now, therefore, be it 12 13 RESOLVED, That the contract for water service between the City of Mendota Heights and the 14 Board of Water Commissioners is hereby approved and that the proper officers of the City of 15 Saint Paul are hereby directed to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Saint Paul. 16 Yeas Nays Absent Blakev ✓ Requested by Department of: Grimm ✓ Guerin ✓ Harris ,/ Water Utility Meeard +/ /► \L Rettman ✓ By J( ____ t G o e nera anager Adopted by Council: Date /•t , ( Form Appro ?. by City Attorney Adoption tified by Com. « 7 By ■ im s By: Approved by May Dat , t Approv- I . Mayor for Su mission to Council Ar4 B r BY 7: 21t Ej DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED W N _ 3 4,6 6 4 e Utility 11 20 95 GREEN SHEET DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR / of *04 (1:1 1 CITY COUNCIL INmnua4TE Bernie R. Bullert - 66274 ASSIGN CITY ATTORNEY E CITY CLERK NUMBER MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGE BY (DATE) FOR In BUDGET DIRECTOR wi FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. ORDER Q MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) Q, XIANUARINVIAXX TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 4 (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) / 1 ACTION REOUESTED: Approve Council Resolution for a contract for water service between the Board of Water Commissioners and the City of Mendota Heights. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PUNNING COMMISSION _ — CML SERVICE COMMassum 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for tltls department? - - CIB COMMITTEE YES NO - STAFF 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee.? r YES NO — DISTRICT COURT 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to preen sheet INmATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whet, When, Where, Why): • . The Water Utility will have up to date 20 year contract for retail water service with long -term customer - the City of Mendota Heights. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The City of Mendota Heights will have a public water supply for domestic, commercial, industrial and fire protection uses. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: ��f�� n/rya � g¢ p y WUHvii N L:,.va:.:a Vi �14r1t4 RECEIVED None DEC 2 0 1995 Ib E C 1 5 MAYORr` DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE N/A ACTIVITY NUMBER N/A FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) • NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL • MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO. 298- 4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) • 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. Budget Director 3. City Attorney 3. City Attomey 4. Mayor (for contracts over $15,000) 4. Mayor /Assistant 5. Human Rights (for contracts over $50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the #of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance, whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin •each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the Issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? indicate which Council objective(s) your projecthequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city liability for workers compensation claims, taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projed/acfion. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this project/request produce if it is passed (e.g., traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)? To Whom? When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? Inability to deliver service? Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate? Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost? Who is going to pay? CITY OF ST. PAUL %s' /-Ca. - OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION — GENERAL FORM No. 4392 COMME D BY Harris DATF October 9, 1995' WHEREAS, A contract for water service between the City of Mendota Heights and the Board dated the 14th day of September, 1962 provided for furnishing water to the citizens of Mendota Heights, maintenance of the water system, metering, indemnity of the parties, rates for water, etc.; and WHEREAS, A revised contract has been negotiated that replaces the Contract of September 14, 1962 and amendment of September 16th, 1976 and more completely describes the responsibilities of the Board and the City of Mendota Heights regarding water service, rates, system maintenance, system replacement and expansion, and optional services provided by the Board; and WHEREAS, The terms and conditions of the new contract between the City of Mendota Heights and the Board have been negotiated to the satisfaction of the two parties and Mendota Heights has approved the contract that is now submitted for final approval by the Board; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the contract for water service between the City of Mendota Heights and the Board of Water Commissioners is hereby approved and that the proper officers of the Board are hereby directed to execute said contract on behalf of the Board; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Honorable Council of the City of Saint Paul is requested to approve a resolution authorizing proper city officials to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Saint Paul. Water Commissioners Adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners Yeas Nays Arcand Harris October 9, 19 95 Haselmann President Guerin i In favor 4 o IMPORTANT ' RETURN TO BOARD 1 • SECY. MINUTES- FILE c:lwpwinke.ohits\mendota.htg ORIGINAL