95-1480 •
L L Council File # //to
.1 ' • - Ordinance #
•
„
Green Sheet # s ..3000
ORDINANCE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date 1
p. 10-F .3
3 2
An ordinance amending Chapter 55 of the Saint Paul Legislative
4 Code, pertaining to the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code as it
5 applies to the City of Saint Paul, by deleting Section 55.04,
6 "Amendments to the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code" in its
7 entirety.
8
9 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: •
10
11 Section 1.
12
13 That Saint Paul Legislative Code Section 55.04 be entirely deleted:
14
- See. 55.04. Amend : • • • • - • : • - - • • • •.
J16
17 : - •: . - • • • - ; : - • ; • •- ; : • :0; • ; - • .. • A
18 Raul, is - - - - : :.-; ::• • , •
- .
19
20 ,• • '- - • • ' • ' • • ' • • • •:,
21 Procedures). Thc following section is added to Article 2, Division III:
22
23 Scc. 2.302. Board of Appeals.
24
25 _ ; : - -; •", - ; • • - -- - •- - -
26 iSSI„ - - - • - • ' : • - -. - - - . --- • -
27 enforcement of any provision of the fire code may -appeal to the board of appeals and
28
29 •
1 0 - • - " •
31 " •:" ; " : • ": • •: • - • - • • • • • •
32 Article 79, Division I:
33
34 Scc. 79.115. Hazard Identification.
35
36 (a) BuiklinE4s and prcn • . • • ; - *:- - *: -;- . '
) --
38 - e - • •• ; : r." ; :'": - ... • : ;" —
39 fiann ; - : ; ; -: • - the quantities
40 • -; • - 4 e" • • vr • 4• : • : : ;• : thc
41 later : • - - ; 4 •- -; z• ; e -•: : - --
P: 2 _3f' 3 93-:- /yge
• 1,,
2 , : .. .' - -' - .. , _. : -- -. - - _ - - �� _ ..: 'b , r capacity)
' - - • • :- •
• p Y)'
3
4 - - • - - - _ - = 2. - - . 1 be identified in accordance with the
5 Standard System for the Id• - • _. •_ - - • _ ... - . - •. _ -
6 NFPA 70.1 1980 Edition.
7
8 • e. - , - -
10 of fifty five (55) gallon or less capacity. +�
11
12 -
13 . . - •• - _ - • , ., ., •. __ - - • - . _- . _ .
14 be affixed to tank, ' - - .. • - - .. _ _ .4.
15
16
17 s - _ - :- _. •.. •. - _... • '-
18 exterior of the building.
19 • 20 (d) flrncndnr., • • • - : ! - • - . , • . •- . - - - • •
21 materials). The following amendments to Article 80:
22
24 as follows:
2 6 5 -
- :-
_ . •• - - - ' - - _ •b - - - . • 1 . • • 4 • • - :
28 - : .: - .. - ...: - : . - - •- - - - - "^
29 stored, han: , _ •- _ , . - . - . - • • •- - _ Uniform �l Firc
30 Code, 1982 Edition, pronnAgatcd by the International Conference of Building Officials
31 and - • - • - • - '.
32
33 See. 80.]030). Sec. 80.103, paragraph (h), General Requirements, is amended to r ad
34 as follows:
35
36 ": - •. . - ... - -- ._ •
.. - - -
3 8
39 See. 30.109. Scc. 80.109, Storage Cabinets for Hazardous Materials, is amended to
40 read as follows:
41
42 Storage Cabinets for Iazardous Materials. Cabinets for the storage of hazardous •43 -. -'. . _ -- - .. . . - - - ... : •• .. .
44 minimum of one inch plywood or equivalent which is compatible with the material
46 shall be provided and cabinets shall be liquid tight to the top of the sill. - Cabinets shall
47 _.- _ • . •-. - :.- .._ . _ _
•=8 letters on contrasting background HAZARDOUS KEEP FIRE AWAY and with
hazard identification in accordance with the Standard System for the Identification of
50 the Fire Hazards of Materials sct forth in NFPA 701 1980 Edition.
51
;J p -36 -3 96
• 1, - See. 80.111(a). See. 80.17.1, paragraph (a), Aboveground Storage Tanks and Pressure
2
•
Vessels, is :. • : - : : .. : : :
3
4 • (a) All aboveground storage tanks, pressure vessels and containers over one
) 5 . !e _ : - • :- • -..- :, ... L. :
6 - - •. 2 : - - ..•. :.
7 ... _ _ • _. - _ • .- -- - - • - -- --
8 -: : :.: - , - -• :: . -
9 NFPA 701 1980 Edition.
10
11 _ _► • ' : .. - .. - . -- .. ..
12 .. . . : • - , . . - . .. . - . - • ls-i
13 - : - - _ - ... .
1.4
15 ... - - - : -- - - -• - - - - - - - - - - - - :f the Fire
16 . . - : - ': s set forth in NFPA 704 1980 Edition for size and color and shall
17 - - .. : - . .
18
19 Section 2.
20
21 That these deletions shall become effective thirty (30) days after passage, approval and
22 publication.
23
MMI IM en
JAN 271996
Blakey Yeas Nays Absent Requested by Department of:
Harris .. . ✓
f Kns ✓
Guerin
Megard ✓ " `
Reitman ✓ ,
Tnune By ``. 4 if
1 �^ Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date n,,,^ v \ q
Adoption Certified by Coun Secretary By: �,� .
ry: ILL 1
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
//r „ Council
Approved by i //6� gegt4
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N° 3 0 op 8
Fire safety services GREENS . T
3 CO DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR go CITY COUNCIL INITIAtJRJATE
Steve Zaccard 228 -6201 N NUMBER (Jtm ArroRNEY Dcm CLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) ROUTING ID BUDGET DIRECTOR 0 FIN. a MOT. SERVICES DIR.
2, "4.0 S m MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT)
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP AU. LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Repeal Chapter 55.04 •
}
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Repot (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
_ CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
STAFF YES NO
_ DISTRICT COURT 3. Does this person/firm possess s skill not normally possessed by any current city employe.l
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answer on worsts sheet and attach to g,aan sheet
INTIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Since these .amendments to the state fire code were enacted, the state fir
code was amended to include this hazardous materials placarding, resultin
in a duplication.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
City ordinances are not in conflict with the state fire code.
•
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None Research Center
DEC 13 1995
j qq
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
Potential conflict between city ordinances and state fire code.
{
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 0 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCL .1N TNE•GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PU ING OFFICE (PHONE NO 298- 4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. Budget Director •
3. City Attorney 3. City Attorney -
4. Mayor (for contracts over $15,000) 4. Mayor /Assistant
• 5. Human Rights (for contracts over $50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (alt others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager t Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the #of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecthequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance, whichever Is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your Hst with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue In question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objecthre(s) your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims, taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is sknply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUactton.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this project/request produce if It is passed (e.g., traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)? To Whom? When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service? Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are in general you must answer two questions: How much Is It
going to cost? Who is going to pay?