95-779� j t � � � � �`� � % Council File # �� ���
} ` Green Sheet � 25957
RESOLUTION
C1TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �y
„ �-, _ ,
Pzesented By
Referred To
Requested by Department of:
1 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has been awarded a grant firom the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
2 Resources to conduct the Nonpoint Source Pollution Public Educauon Demonstration project in a joint effort
g. with the Ciry of Minneapolis, and
4
5
6
7
8
9
1Q
11
12
13
14
15
i6
17
18
19
20
2i
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, a total of five neighborhoods with stoi7n sewer drainage to the Mississippi River will be targeted
in both cities for a phone suivey to assess the understanding of nonpoint source pollulion, and
WHEREAS, community organizing will be conducted, a series of educational brochures will be distributed
and a follow up survey will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the community organizing and the
educational materials, and
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has entered into an agreement with the Citizens for a Better Environment to
coordinate this project, now, therefore be it,
RESOLUED, by the Ciry of Saint Paul Q�at the City enter into the attached Substate Agreement with the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to coi�duct the following Project: Nonpoint Source Pollution Public
Education Demonsh�ation, azld be it,
FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City that the Mayor, Norcn Coleman, be authorized to execute the attached
Substate Agreement for tl�e al�ove meutioned Project on behalf of the City, and be iz,
FURTHER RE50LVED, by the City of Saint Paul that the City accept� the grant of $1Q0,0(10 from the
Legislafive Commission on Minnesota Resources for the two year period 6eginning July 1, 1995, and be it,
FINALLY RESOLVED, by the City of Saint Paui that the City is committed to providing $6,000 in matching
money far this project out of die 19�6 Public Works Sewer Division Storm Water Manaaement Activiry for
grinting educaaonal materials, mailing labets and postage.
n�.,
Byc
Approved byjMa1z6r: Date
Public Works
By: L" '",�,� Is `^"—
Stacy . Becker, Director
Form A}�qved by
By:
Committee: Date
2-ii-s�'
for Sub�%Ission to Council
By:
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoptigg Certified by Counci Secretary
�� ���
DEPARThIENTlOFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INIPATED G R E E N S H E ET NO.� 25957�
Public Works 6/29/95 � i �.� A .�
COMACT PERSON & PHONE � OEPARTMENT DIflECTOR ❑7 CITY COUNCIL
Anne Weber, 266-6245 ^S�� CITYATfOflNEY
NUMBER FOp � CITV CLEBK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DAT� qOUTING UDGETDIRECTOR �F�N.&MGT.SEflVICESDIR.
ORDEB
6 MAYOR(ORASSISTAN'n �g FinanceAccoun'n
TOTAL t OF SIGNANRE PAGES _(CIJP ALL IOCATIONS FOR SIGNANR� ❑j ASSOCIATE � DEPT. ACGOUM
ACTON REWESTED
Approve the attached resolution accepting a grant for $100,000 from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources,
approving the contract with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and committing to matching funds of $6,600 for the tdonpoint
Source Pollution Education Demonstration Project.
RECAMMENpATIONS: Appmve (A) or Rejeq (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLQWING �UESTIONS:
PLAHNIN(i COMMISSION _CNII $ERVICE COMhVSS10N 1. Nas this persoMirm ever worKed untler a contrnct fos this tlepactmer�Y?
YES NO
ciBCOnahfTiEE _ 2. Has ihis persoMirtn ever been a cHy employee?
A �� _ YES NO
— 3. Does this person/lirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by afry curtent cAy
DISTRICTCOUNCIL _ Employ2E?
SUPPOATSWVflCHCOUNCILO&fECTVE4 YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to 9reen sheet
INITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPOflNNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH`n:
The City of Saint Paul has been awarded a grant of $100,000 from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources to conduct the Nonpoint Source Pollution Public Education Demonst�' ' ct in cooperation with the
City of Minneapolis.
JU! i 1 1995
����� ������«
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Saint Paul and Minneapolis wilf be working with Citizens for a Better Environment in a total of five neighborhoods in
both cities. This sets the groundwork for the City of Saint Paul in future development of a Nonpoint Source Pollution
Public Education Program. This program will be a requirement under Saint Paul's Municipal Stormwater Discharge
Permit.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None
DISADVANTAGES IF N0T APPROVED:
The grant dollars will not be awarded to Saint Paul. The opportunity to work cooperatively with the City of
Minneapolis and Citizens For a Better Environment will be lost.
TOTAL AMOUNi OF TRANSACTION S � OC,OOO.00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE Sewer Service Fund 260 pCITVI7YNUMBER 260-22225
FINANCIPL INFOflMAT10N: (IXPIAIN)
'�
C
51�nn � � �
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND THE CITY OF ST. PAUL
� � ��� ��
95-779�1
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the State of Minnesota, acting by and through its
Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (hereinafter the "State"); and the city
of St. Paul (hereinafter the "Recipient").
WHEREAS, the Recipient has proposed the Nonpoint Source Pollution Public Education
Demonstration Project;
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature by 1995 Minnesota Laws Ch. 220, Sec. 19, su . 6
appropriate $100,Q00 to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollutaon Control Agency for a
contract with the city of St. Paul for a joant project with the city of Minneapolis to conduct
surveys and develop and implement nonpoint source pollution public education;
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed between the State and the recipient as follows:
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1.1 The State awards to the Recipient up to $ l OQ,�OQ for the Nonpoint Source Pollution
Public Education Project (hereinafter the "Project"). The obligation of the State under
this Agreement is limited to $100,000.
1.2 The Recipient acknowiedges that these funds aze proceeds from the Minnesota Future
Resources Fund (hereinafter the "Fund'�, which is subject to certain legai restrictions and
requirements, including Minnesota Statutes Ch. 116P. The Recipient is responsible for
compliance with this and all other relevant state and federal laws and regulations
promulgated pursuant thereto goveming the proceeds of the Minnesota Future Resources
Fund in the fulfillment of the Project.
13 CONTACTPERSONS
The authorized contact person for the State is:
Patricia Engelking
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Water Quality Division
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
(612) 247-3825
; <1
5/95
,
°15l ��q
The auihorized agent for the Recipient is:
Anne Weber
City of St. Paul
Department of Public Works
1000 CHA, 25 West Fourth Streez
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
(612) 266-6245
The acting fiscal agenY for the Recipient:
Anne Weber
City of St. Paul
Department of Public Works
1000 CHA, 25 West Fourth Street
St. Paul, MinnesoYa 55102
(6I2} 266-6245
2. PROJECT
2.1 PROJECT APPROPRIATION .
An appropriation to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for an
agreement with the city of St. Paul for a joint project with the city of Minneapolis to
conduct surveys and develop and 'unplement nonpoint souzce pollutlon public education.
2.2 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
The Project shall have a Work Program approved by the Legislative Commission on
Minnesota Resources (hereinafter the "LCMR'�} which is attached as E�ibit A and made
part of this Agreement. This Work Program describes the work to be completed by the
Recipient, the specific products that will be produced along with the dates by which they
will be delivered, and an estimate of the cost associated with each product. All material
changes to the Work Program must be approved by the LCMR and approved chan�es will
be made part of this Agreement by reference. The Recipient sha11 complete the Project as
described in the approved Work Prograxn and its amendments. The State has relied on
the Recipient's estimate of the total funds required to complete the Project. I£the State
funds prove insufficient to complete the Project, the Recipient agrees to supply additional
funds as needed. All deliverables or evidence that the deliverables have been
satisfactorily comp�eted are due 'uz the LCMR o�ce with a copy to the STaYe conYact
person by June 30, 199'7 (no exceptions}.
5/95
95-779
The State and the LCMR may require the Recipient to supply additionai specifications
about the project, including site plans, building specifications, research methodology and
detailed work schedules. These additional specifications are subject to approval by the
State. After completion of the Project, the Recipient shail certify in writing to the State
that the Project, as conducted, conforms to these approved specifications.
2.3 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVTSION
The Recipient shall be responsible for the administration, supervision, management and
Project oversight that may be required for the work performed under this Agreement.
The Recipient may employ such professional services as it deems reasonable and
necessary to provide these services, subject to the provision of Section 5(Costs).
2.4 OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERT'Y RIGHTS
A11 ri�hts, title, and interest to a11 intellectual property rights, including patents,
copyrights, services and trade mazks, in ail materials conceived or originated by Recipient
either individually or jointly with others, wluch arise out of the per£ormance of this
Agreement, are jointly owned by the Recipient and the State. The State's ownership shaii
equal the percentage of the total Project cost paid for by State funds under this
appropriation. Recipient's contribution must be foz eligible costs for the Project. Ali
Recipient's contribution must be approved in advance to be eligible to qualify as
Recipient's contribution to the total Project costs for delivery ownership and zegular
percentages. This ownership interest shall not be reduced by any reimbursements to the
Fund made by the l2ecipient under Section 2.6 Sales of Products or Section 2.7 Royalty
Payments. Any report, study, computer softwaze, data base, model, invention,
photogragh, negative, audio or video recording, or other item oz document, in whatever
form, created or prepazed by the Recipient in the performance of its obligations under this
Aa eement aze the exclusive properry of the Recipient and the Stafe except where stated
otherwise in this Agreement. The Recipient, at the request of the State, shall execute any
necessary documents necessary to transfer ownershap rights to the State.
Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made
or conceived for the first time, actually or constructively reduced to practice by the
Recipient or its employees in the course of or in connection with this Agreement, the
Recipient shall urunediately give the State contact person and the LCMR written notice
thereof, and shall promptly fumish the contact person and the LCMR with complete
information thereon. The State, in consultation with the LCMR and the Recipient has the
sole right to determine whether or not and where a patent application shall be filed.
The Recipient and the State reserve the right to use for their own purposes any �
intellectual property right produced as the result of the Project without payment to the
other pariy. The parry using said product shall protect the intellectual properiy rights to
the product and advise the other party of its use.
v 3
5/95
q�-���
The State reserves "mazch-in" rights which can be exercised if the Recipient fails to
maxket or offer to mazket any product resulting from acuvities undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement within tluee (3) years from the termination of this Agreement,
notwithstanding the above provisions of thzs section. Recipient shall, upon request of the
State, execute and provide the necessary documents for this purpose.
2.5 OWNERSHIP OF RESEARCH RESULTS
If, within three (3) yeazs of the terminafion of this Ab eement, the Recipient elects not to
commercialize any product derived from the research conducted under this Project, the
reseazch materials shall be returned to the State without cost and free and cleaz of any
obligation to the Recipient.
Recipient represents and warrants that the matezial pzoduced under this Agreement does
not and will not infringe upon the inteilectual property rights of another, including
patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade and services mazks and names. Recipient wilt
defend and indemnify the State at RecipienYs expense any claims or actions brought
a�ainst the State to the extent that it is based ou a claun or action that all or part of the
material infringes upon the intellectual properry rights of another. Recipient is
responsible for obtaining any necessary licenses to use the intellectual property rights of
another.
2.6 SALE OR LICENSE OF PRODUCTS
The Recipient a�ees to reimburse the Fund revenues it receives from licenses, transfers,
or other income generated from products based upon materials derived from the Project
up to the amount of State funds provided under this Agreement. Such reimbursement
will be made by the Recipient upon first sale of any product worldwide whether or not
such products are patentable.
The Recipient, for itself and its licensees, a�ees to sell any groduct derived from this
Agreement and not subject to ownership by the State to the State of Minnesota far the
royalty-free wholesate price Iess a ten percent (10%) discount. This cIause shall continue
to be in effect after all State funds have been repaid to the State.
2.7 ROYALTY PAYMENTS
The StaYe owns and shall take title to-the percentage of a royalty, copyright or patent
resulting from this project equal to the percentage of the project's toTal fundin� provided
by this appropriarion subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. ck. 116P.10. Cash receipts
resulting from royalties from the licensing of copyright, patent, or other intellectual
properties shatl be paid to the Fund on a quazferly basis witfiin t$irty (30) days after the
end of each calendaz quarter. Recipient shall not license the intellectual property rights
without the express written Agreement of the State.
4
5/95
95
2.8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Recipient agrees to acknowiedge the State's fmancial support for this Project. Any
statement, press zelease, bid, solicitation, or other document issued describing the Project
shall provide information on the amount and proportion of State funds supporting the
totai cost of the Project and will contain the following language:
Funding for this project approved by the Minnesota Legislature,
1995 Minnesota Laws, Ch. 220, Sec. 19, Subd. 6o as
recommended by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources from the Minnesota Future Resources Fund.
Any site developed or improved by ttus Pro}ect shall display a sign, in a form approved
by the State, stating that the site has received funding from the Minnesota Legislature.
2.9 REPORTS
The Recipients shall submit periodic Work Program status reports to the LCMR with
copies to the State's authorized contact person in a form prescribed by the LCMR on or
before the reporting dates stated in the Work Program. The State may require additional
reports from the Recipients.
2.10 PURCHASE OF RECYCLED AND RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
The Recipient shall use this appropriation in compliance with Minn. Stat, ch. 16B.121 to
16B.123 requiring the purchase of recycled, repairable, and durable materials, the
purchase of uncoated paper stock, and the use of soy-based ink, the same as if it were a
state agency. The Recipient shall ensure that all sub-recipients comply with this
requirement. Any deliverables submitted to the LCMR office will be re}ected if not in
compliance and will be deemed late and/or unacceptable. -
2.11 PL3BLICATIONS
The State agrees that researchers engaged in this Project aze encouraged to present at
symposla, national or regional professional meetings, and to publish methods and results
of the project in journals, tl�eses or dissertations or otherwise of this own choosing
provided necessary steps have been taken to protect the patents, copyrights, and other
intellectual property rights resulting from the project. Research results must include the
acknowledgment provided for in Section 2.8.
The Recipient shall provide advance notification the State two weeks before publicizing
any data or information derived from the Project in a press release, publication., or
presentation.
2.12 FAILURE TO COMPLETE PROJECT
No reimbursements will be awarded under this Agreement after_ 7une 30, 1997, unless the
Recipient has completed the Proj ect in accordance with the approved Work Program by
this date
5l95
9�-���
2.13 DATA COMPATIBILITY
Pursuant to 1995 Minnesota Laws, Ch. 220, Sec. 19, subd. 14, all data collected pursuant
to projects funded by this appropriafion that have common value for natural resouTCe
pianning and management shali conform to informauon azchitecture as defined in
guidelines and standards adopted by the informafion policy office. The Recipient shall
make these data available to data review committees that may be established and to
LMIC and bear any costs associated with integrating this data with LMIC's geographic
data bases.
3. USE OF FUNllS
The Recipient shall use the proceeds of this Agreement only £or the eligible costs of the
Project as described in the approved Work Program.
4. MATCHING Fi.JNDS
The appropriation language of 1995 Minnesota Laws Ch. 220, Sec. 19, Subd. 6o states
that this appropriafion must be matched by $12,000 in non-state money and that these
matching funds must be committed by January 1, 1996, or the appropriation will be
canceled. No state funds will be made available under this Agreement unfil the Recipient
has provided the StaYe and the LCMR with a description of the non-state matching funds,
evidence of their fair market value, and certification that they aze legatly callectible. In
the event that part or all of these matching funds 2ater become unavailable or
uncollectible, the Recipient aa ees to satisfy any deficiency.
Eligible non-state matching monies consist of cash-in-hand or legally enforceable pledges
of money.
5. COSTS
5.1 ELIGIBLE COSTS
Eligible costs are those costs directly incurred by the Recipient that aze solely related to
and necessary for producing the work products described in the approved work program.
Eligible costs may include the following:
5.1.1 Advertising costs solely for (1) Recruihnent ofpersonnel; (2) Solicitation of bids;
(3) Disposal of scrap materials; (4) Other purposes specifically provided for in the
approved Work Program;
5.1.2 Capital expenditures for facilities, equipment and other capital assets as expressly
approved in the Work Program. For expenditures greater than $1,500, the Recipient must
include in the Work Program an explanation as to how all the equipment purchased with
the appropriation will continue to be nsed for the same program through its useful life, or,
if the use changes, a commitrnent to pay back to the Fund an amount equal to either tfie
cash value received or a residual value approved by the director of the LCMR if it is not
sold;
5/95
95-779
5.1.3 Communication costs incurred for telephone calls and postage;
5.1.4 Materials and supplies;
5.1.5 Printing and reproduction costs necessary for contract adminisfration; Publication costs of
reports reiating to contract accomplishments;
5.1.6 Transportation and travel expenses such as freight relating to goods purchased for the
Project, and lodging, meals, and transportation of personnel involved in the Pro}ect in the
same manner and in no greater amount than provided for in the current "Non-manageriai
Unrepresented Empioyees' P1an" promulgated by the commissioner of Employee
Relations;
5.1.7 Wages and expenses of salaried Recipient employees if specified in the Work Program;
5.1.8 Fringe benefit costs of Recipient's employees if specified in the Work Program;
5.1.9 Professional services specified in the approved Work Program that aze rendered by ;
individuals or organizations not a part of the Recipient;
5.1.10 Expenditures incurred after the effective date of the approved Work Program and before
the effective date of this Agreement.
The following types of costs aze eligible provided that they are directly incurred by the
Recipient; aze solely related to and necessary for producing the work products described in the
approved Work Progzam; and have prior writien approval of the State: •
5.1.11 Professional services not specified in the approved Work Program that aze rendered by
individuals or organizations not a part of the Recipient;
5.1.12 Educational program expenses such as conferences, seminars, books, materials and
supplies;
5.1.13 Public utilities such as water, sewage, electricity;
5.1.14 Maintenance and repairs incurred for upkeep of property used directly in the Project
which keeps it in an e�cient operating condition;
5.1.15 Administrafive expenses such as accounting and budgeting.
Any cost not defined as an eligible cost or not included in the approved Work Program shall not
be paid from State funds committed to the Project.
5/95
��-���
52 NONELIGIBLE CO�TS
Noneligible costs for reimbursement means all costs not defined as eligible costs,
inciuding, but not limited to, the following:
5.21 Any costs incurred before this Agreement is executed, except as provided in Section
5.1.10;
5.2.2 Fund raising;
5.23 T�es, except sales ta�c on goods and services;
5.2.4 Insurance, except tifle insurance;
5.2.5 Attomey fees, except for acquisition and clearing title to �and;
5.2.6 Loans, grants or subsidies to persons or entities for development;
5.2.7 Bad debts or contingency funds;
, 5.2.8 Interest;
5.2.9 Lobbyists;
5.2.10 Political contributions.
6. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES
To obtain reimbursement under tYus A�reement, the Recipient shall provide the State with
evidence that the portion of the deliverable product and its related expenditures for which
payment is requested has been satisfactorily completed. The State will make the fmal
deternunation whether the expenditures aze eligibie for reimbursement under this
Agreement and verify the toYal amount requested. -
All rennbursement requests for this project must be received by the State on or before
August 31, 1997. No facsimiles will be accepted. Reguests received after this date will
not be eligible for reimbursement.
ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT
The Recipient shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence gertaining to
the costs and expenses of implementing this Agreement to the e�ctent and in such detail
that will accurately reflect the total cost of the Project and all net costs, direct and
indirect, of labor, materials, equipment, supplies, services, and other costs and expenses.
The Recipient shall use generally accepted accounting principles. AII records sball be
retained for five (5) yeazs aftez the issuance of the final certificate of acceptance by the
State.
The State, its representative, or the legislative auditor shall have the right to examine
books, records, documents, and other evidence and accounting procedures and practices,
sufficient fo reflect properly all direct and indirect costs. The Recipient shall make
available at a1I reasonable times and before aad durng the period of records retention
proper facilities for such examination and audit.
8
5/95
95
8. I�UMAN RIGHTS
The Recipient, in the conduct of the Project, shall comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (P.L. 100-336); Minn. Stat. ch. 363 (the Minnesota Human
Rights Act), and Minn. Stat. § 181.59-60, which forbid discriminatory practices and
provide for affirmative action; and all applicable rules and subsequent amendments.
The Recipient shall provide the State with evidence that it has received a certificate of
compliance from the Commissioner of Human Rights pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 363.073,
or is exempt from said statute. This evidence of compliance is attached as E�iibit E.
9. WORKERS COMPENSATION
The Recipient in the conduct of the Pzoject shall comply with the provisions for workers
compensation in Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 1 and Minn. Stat. § 176.182. et se�. and
other applicable law.
10. LTABILITY
Recipient agrees to idemnify and save hold the State, its agents and employees, harmless
from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of this
Agreement by Recipient or Recipient's agents or employees. This clause shall not be
construed to bar any legal remedies Recipient may have for the State's failure to fulfill its
obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The State's liability shall be govemed by the
provisions of the Mirmesota Tort Ciaims Act, Minn. Stat. § 3.736, et se�. and other
applicable laws. The RecipienYs liabiliiy shall be govemed by the provisions of Minn.
Stat. ch. 466 and other applicable laws.
11. TERM
11.1 EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall become legally effective upon such date as at is executed by the
Commissioner of Pinance or July l, 1995, whichever is later and shall remain in effect
untal June 30, 1997, or until all obligations set forth in thas Agreement have been
satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
11.2 TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the State for cause at any time upon seven (7) days
written notice to the RecipienT. Cause shall mean a material breach of this Aa eement
and any supplemental agreements or amendments thereto.
This A�reement may also be terminated by the State in the event of a default by the
Recipient or in the event that the Legislature rescinds the appropriation to this Project.
This Agreement may be terminated by the State or the Recipient at any time with or
without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. In the event of such
a cancellation, ttae Recipient shall be entitled to payment determined on a pro rata basis
for work or services satisfactorily performed.
9
5i95
��-���
113 AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended in writing by the mutual agreement of the State and the
Recipient Amendments must be consistent with the Work Program and its approved
amendments.
12. ANTI-TRUST PROVISION
The Recipient hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and atl claims for overcharges
as to goods and/or services provided in connection with the Agreement resulting from
anti-trust violations which arise under the anti-trust laws of the United Stafes and the
anti-h�ust laws of the State of Minnesota.
13. CHOICE OF LAW
All matters relating to the performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and
determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
City of St. Paul
B
Mayor
Date
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
:
Title
By Date
Director, Deparlment of Public Works
Date
Department of Finance
$ y B y -
Director, Department of Finance and
Management Service Title
Date
Approved as to form:
By
Assistant City Attomey
Date
A certified copy of the City of St, Paul
Resolution unconditionally approving this
Agreement is attached as E�ibit C.
Approved as to form and execution
Hubert H. Humphrey, III
�y
Assistant Attorney General
Date
Date
10
5/95
95-779
����.�������
A Work Program with LCMR Approval Letter
B List of Deliverable Products and Related Budget
C Certification and Approval by Board or Council (if applicable)
D Federal Approval of Oil-Overcharge Project (if applicable)
E Evidence of Compliance with Affirmative Action Statute (if applicable)
5/95
m
q�-779
lEGISIATZVE COMMISSION OF MINNESOTA R'cSOURCES
NCNPOINT SOURCE POILUTION PUBLIC EDUCATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IJORK PROGRAM
PROJECT DELIVERABLE DA7ES AND ESTIMA7ED COSSS
DeliVerable DeliverzbLe Objective LCMR MaSCh
Date Toial Total Attaunt Amount
D. Community Organinzing
D.'I Identify partners 54,648 54,648 0
Commitment from one 3/96 51,907
Commitment from tvo . 9/96 52,747
D.2 Analyze needs & acTions 310,986 510,986 0
AnaLysis ofi one 10/96 55,282
AnaLysis ofi tuo 2/97 55,7D1
D.3 Heetings on needs & actions 53,592 53,592 0
Five meetings viTh one 2/97 51,690
five meeiings with tvo 4l97 51,901
D,4 Draft neighborhood plans 514,895 514,895 0
One drafit ptan 6/97 57,289
` One drefit plan 6/97 87,606
E. Develop & Distribute Educaiional Materials
E.1 Research educational materiats 59,718 59,718 0
Tvo neighborhood profiile 1/96 52,747
7hree neighborhood profite 4196 53,380
Nonpoint factsheets 6/96 �3,592
E.2 Wri2e neighborhocd profiles 55,704 55,704 �
Five draft profiiles 3/96 52,113
Tuo final profiiles 4/96 5'1,268
Three finat profiiles 6/96 52,324
E.3 IJrite and design factsheets 58,627 56�127 • 2500
Dratt narratives 7/96 s2,1'13
FinaL narratives 9/96 41,901
Design Layout 5/96 51,268
Incorpora:e survey 8196 5845
E.4 Print factsheets 54,556 51,056 3506
Factsheets printed 8197 54,556 "
E.5 Mail $4,169 83,164 60Q�
Print labels 9/96 56�634
Mait 12/96 52,535
P. Develop & Conduct Follovup Survey, Analyze
F.1 Drafit questions 5951 5951 0
Draft questions 12/96 5951
F.2 Final survey preparations 4'1�268 S'1,268 0
Finat questions 'i2/96 $L23
Sample size 12l96 82'11
Database 12/96 8219 -
Train callers 'I/97 3423 =
F.3 [onduct survey 83�141 83;14'I 0
Complete catls _ 2/97 53,141
F,4 Analyze data 55,440 35,440 0
Analysis of {5ndings 4/97 55,440
5192,000 $'100,000 512,600
c�� - 9 �g
LEGISLpTLVE COMMZSSION OF MINNESOTA RESOURCES
NONPOINT SOURCE POILUTION PUBLIC EDUCATION DEHONSTRA7ION PROJECT WORK PRWRAM
PROJEC7 DELIVERABLE DATES AND ESTIMA7E� COSTS
Delivera6le Delivereble Objective ICMR Hatch
Da2e Total Total Amount Amount
A. Adminstration
A.'I Startup 5'1,373 51,373 0
ColLaboretor meetings Ongoing 9739
Staffi descriptions 8/95 521'I
ConTracts 8/95 5423
A.2 Advisory bcard 52,451 52,459 0
Recruitment 9/95 51,056
tteetings Onaoing 5'1,394
A.3 Accouniing and Report Yriting 53,803 53,803 0
Acct. sysT, bitling Ongoing 5'1,690
Reports Ongoing S2,'113
8. Setect Neiahborhaods
6.1 �esign neigfi. select. criteria 52,324 52,324 Q
Oraft criieria 40/95 51,479
Final criteria 11/95 58G5
8.2 App(y criieria, pick 9Q neigh. � S2,SH5 52,535 0
List ofi 10 12/45 52,535
B.3 Neigh6orhood meetings 52,958 52,958 0
Completed 8 meetings 9/95 51,OSfi
CompLeted 8 meetings 91/95 5845
Completed 8 meeiings 11% 57,056
8.4 Fina! selection of 5 neigh. 51,479 57,479 ' D
LisL o{ 5 neighborho�s 3/46 5'1,479
C. Develop & Conduct S�rvey, Analyze Data "
C.7 Drait questions 51,907 51,909 D
� Dratt quesiions 92/95 59,907
C.2 FinaL survey preparations ' S2,747 52,747 0
Finat questions 3I96 51,056
Sample size 4/96 5423
DaYabase 5/96 5845 -
Train callers 4/96 5423
C.3 Conduct survey 53,351 53,351 0
Complete calls 6/96 53,351
c.4 Analyze data 54,384 54,384 0
Anatysis ofi findings 7J96 54,384
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
- .. �" r.' . . - '. . � _. . .. . .
Date of Report= November 30, 1994
. . . . ' ". ":�'!'-'F�.:� .. �< �.�' �
=::95 .. _.
I. Project TiLle and Project Nwnb¢I: NO:?DO±Il4 Source ?ollutioa
?ublic �ducatioa Denonstration ?roject. F22
Program *ianager: r.�ne we�er
A9ency A£filiation: City oi St. Paul
Mail Address: Deoartmer,t of ?ublic Works
?000 CHA, 25 West Pourth Street
St. ?eul, '.'N SSi02
Phone: (612) 266-6245
Fax: (612) 298-5621
A. Legal Citation: 2�5, 95, Chp,, Art. , Sec. , Subd. 6(oj.
Total biennial LCMR zppropriation: $100,000
Balance: $100,000
m
Appropriation Language: This 2ngropriztion is £ro:n t?;e £uture
resources fund to the co�. o£ the pollution cor.trol ager.cy
for an agreemer,t with the city of S�. ?sul for a joint oroject wiLh
the city o£ Minneapolis to conduct surveys and cevelop znd
implement nonnoint source pollution nublic educatioa. This
appropriation must be natched 'ny at lezst $12,000 of nonstzte
money.
��
B. Status o£ Match Reqvirement:
Match Reqvired: $12,000
Amovnt Committed to Date: 0
Match Spent to Date: 0
� 'IT. Project Sumroary: TSe qoal oi this project is to demonstrate
how cooperative e£iorts betueen local government and orcznizztior.s
such as neighhorhood, bus?ness, and environmental crovos, c2n
effectively address nonpoir.0 source pollution. ihis unique
collaborative effort, between the St. ?avl and N,inneapolis Public
Works Departments and Citizeas £or a 3etter Environment (CBF),
combines the cities' technical re=_ources with CBS's experience in
community outreach.
With Minnesota's efforts on point pollution and combined sev:e=
overflow resultiag in ir,�proved river water quality, nanagers are
now czlling £or a reorientation toward nonpoint poilution. I�
urban arezs, this pollution cof�es from stormwzter ruaoff which
contains high levels of sediments, nutzients, oil and Grease, and
heavy metzls.
The project will focus on Twin Cities� neiahborhoods with storm
drainzge areas going to t;�e �,ississippi River. Pive areas
representing a diverse demoqrzphic mix and a vzriety o£
residential, commercial and industrial land uses will be
1
}
- . . . .. �':� � .. . _ _ ._
� __ -_ = - �5-��9
targeted. Working with local partners, we will use a three-pronged
� . - - � strategy to:
.� -- 1.) Survey the understanding of nonpoint issues within a
� diverse szmple of Twin Cities' neighborhoods;
2.) Develop and distribute msterials thzt broaden that
understanding; and
- - 3.) Develop actioa nlans with existing local institutions to
. ' - _--- address nonpoint pollution.
�.' ��-�� The survey and its resalts, educational �aterials, aad action plans
-- . v:i11 serve as models to other Minnesota cor.cnunities looking to:
� -- Think watershed, act locally:
b '
IZZ. Six Month Work Progxam Update Summary: N/A
IV. Statement oi Objectives:
A. Administration: Setup the systems needed to operate a two year
collaborative nroject. =his iacludes developing az accounting
system, sta�f descriptions, contracts, and an advisory board, as
ue11 as report writing.
B. Select Target Neighborhoods: Design criteria for ne°_ohborhood
selection znd �pply these criteria to pick 10 dra£t neichborhoods
in which we can work. 3eview with zdvisory board and neet w_th
residential, political, bcsiness, and conc�ercial leacers to select
final five r.e_chborhoods
C. Develop and Conduct Survey, P_nalyze Data: Devetop survey
questians to assess understanding of noapoint source pollution with
input £rom acvisory bozrd and University o£ Minaesota Center for
Survey Research. Comoi?e database, trzin callers, complete ac
leasc 400 surveys, and z,alyze data_
D. Commuaity Organizing: Identify partners within at le�st two of
the tar9eted communities interested in developing action plans
which address nor.point pollution. Analyze needs �nd potential
actions. Follow-up with reetings to orovide comauait lADL't £or a
written document which lays out dra£t action plzas.
� ' E_ Develop and Distribute Educational Haterials: Conpile profiles
� � ' o£ each of the £ive neichborhoocs using data such as: quality and
:-. -- � quantity o£ rur.off; types of sLrf�ce Maters; land use; existiag =nd
� "� � historic natural systems; watershed plaas; and populatior. Use
�� profiles _'or community or9anizing. In addition, develop a series
of three £actsheets on nonpoint pollution which broaden
understanding of the issues based on results fro,�+ t?�e survey.
Distribute these nateria3s to 5,000 housel:olds in the five tzrceted
r.eighborhoods.
2
t
+ �
�
F_ Develop and Conduct Followup Survey, Analyze Data: Develop and
iapler,.ent survey to zssess eEfectiveness o£ educatioaal materials
and comnuaity organizing.
Ti.meline £or Completion of Objectives: � � _ � � � �
7/95 1/96 6/96 1/97 6/97
A. Administration xxx x x x x x x x
B. Select Neighborhoods xxxxxxxx •
C. Survey xxxxxxxxxxxx
D. Colmcunity Orgznizing xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
E. Educational Materials xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
F. Followup Survey xxxxx
3
g�-� �9
V. Objectives/OVtcomes:
A. Administiation:
A.1 Activity: Collzborator meetings. Three stzrtup and
seven quazterly fo2lowup meetings between project
col!aborators :ron St. ?aul, Minneepolis, and CBE.
Additional time to £inalize contracts, staf£
descriptions, and othei startup details.
A.l.a. Context withia the project_ These acti,vities put
i.:to pl�ce the systems needed to run this two year
collaborative project.
A.l.b. Methods: N/A -
A.l.c. Haterizls: ?7/A
A.l.d. Budget
Tota1 Biennial LCY,Fi Budget: $1,373
LCl42 Salznce: $I,373
2iATCY:
HATCH BAT.FNCE:
A.1-e_ Timeline:
Yezr 1 7/95 9/95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xxxx xx xx xx
Collzbor�tor meetines
PRODUCT @2 xx
Sta££ cescript_on
PRODUC'i #3 xxxx
Contracts
Yezr 2 7/96 9/96 11/46 1/96 3/97 5/97
PRODUCT #1 xx xx xx xx
collaSorator meetincs
A.2 Activity: Acvisory boerd. aec_*vit board menuers from
a variety o£ expertises iacluding: business, eczdemia;
Eederzl, stzte, a.^,d local oovernaent; r,eighborhood
croups; watershed mznagers; znd�£ocncztions.
A.2.a. Context vitbin the project: This board w±ll help
connect tY:e psoject to many sectors of the community,
uhile providing important expertise to project
collzborators. � ".
A.2.b. Methods: N/A
A.Z.c. Y.ateiials: N/A
4
.. ._� - . _ � .�. ' ., . _. ' .. � � ' .. ' . . _. . . _ . � -
- A.2.d. Budget
� - � Total Hiennial LCYS2 Budgetc $2,?51
"" - LR�R Balance: $2,451
. ' Y,ATC3: 0
MATCH HALANCE:O
, a.2.e_ Tvneline:
-� �- Year 1 7/95 9/95 1!/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
: YRODUCT #1 xs.xxxx
_ - : Advisory bozrd recrvi:ed
- �.� PRODUCT #2 xX xx xx xx
�� . _ _ _.'. Adviso=y board meetiacs
�- ._ Yezr 2 7/96 9/96 ll/96 1/9� 3/97 5/97
� PRODUC2 €2 xx xx xx xx
-.. ;,dvisory �oard meetir.cs
A.3 Activity: Accounting znd zeport writing. Setup the
accour.tiag e^d =eport writing systems.
A.3.a. Context within the project: The �ccounting system
. . w�ill be estabiis?�ed =_o thzt all uork can be bi?led by St.
?zu1 to the !!innesota Pollution Control F.gency on a bi-
� _ monthly bzs=s. Aeports xill be doae, zs recuired, bi-
. � . or,nually.
�� . A.3.b. Hethods: N/A
" � � A.3.c. Materials: 1/A
_ 'n_ '. : .,._C:-:i
� � A.3.d. Budget
� . Total Bienni�l LCMR Budget: $3,603
LCM32 Balance: $3,803
HATCH: 0
MATCH BALA27CE: 0
A.3.e. Timel.ine:
. Year 1 7/95 4/95 il/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRnDUCT #1 xxxx xx xx xx xx xx
�-. P.ccovntinq system� onaoir.g billing
. PRODUCT #2 xx xx
Repoits
Year 2 7/96 9/96 17/96 3/97 3/97 5/47 •
PRODUCT #1 xx ax xx xx xx xx
Accounting system, ongoing billing '
PRODUCT #2 xx xx
Reports
5
e
W
95-779
e
�
q5-�
s. Select Neighborhoods
B.1 Activity: Design neighborhood selection critezia.
B.l.a. Context within the project: Criteria are needed to
determine which five neighborhoods to work with on this
project. Possibilities includec demograph±c diversity;
quaZity and quantity of runotf; types of surface waters;
land use; existir.g and histo=ic natural systems;
watershed plans; and co:nmunity interest.
- B.l.b. HetLods: Co?lect information from census data,
existing or orojected storrwater quzlity data, city land
tse sna!yses ceveloped Eor Clean w�ter Act permits,
historic maps aad oral histo:ies, znd wate:shed
management organizztions.
B.l.c. Haterials: N/A
B.l.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCHI2 Budget: 52,324
-- LCYR Balance: 52,324
- MATCH: 0 • ."
HATCH BALANC£: 0
- B.l.e. Timeline:
� Yezr 1 7/95 9/95 ll/95 1/96 3/96 � 5/96
PRODUCT #1 Xxxx xx
Dra£t criteria
PRODUCT #2 xxxX
Final criteria
B.2 Activity: Aop!y criteria, select ?0 neig^borhooc's
8.2.a. Context vithin the project: Ten neichborhoods
representing the criteria developed in activity B.2 wi?1
be selected.
B.2.b. Hethods: NJA
B.2_c. Materials: N/A
B.2.d. Budget
Total Bieanial LCt42 Budget: 52,535
LCMIt Balance: $2,535
HF.TCH : 0
MATCH HALANCE: 0 '
B.2_e. Timeline_
Year 1 7/95 9J95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 . xxxx xxxx xx
List of 10 neighborhoods
b
95
B.3 Activity: reiqhborhood neetin�s. weet with b�siaess,
politiczl, govern�eat, and residential !eaders in a b-oad
variety o`_ r.eighbor�oods.
S.3.a. Coate�ct within the project: Shis series oi at
lezst 2� neetings wi11 serve two ou;�oses. First, ttey
wi11 helo ns build interest and support aYOnnd r.on�oint
pollution issues. Zn addition� they wi11 nelo cs
determir.e where we covld build the naztnerships needed to
nake our com, unicy o:genizing e�iective.
B,3.b. HetLods: Meet in a variety of £o.ums £rom monthly
neighborhood groep agendzs to pubLc in_'ormatioa;aeetings
and oae-on-ones with business and oolitical leace,s.
B.3.c. Haterials: N/�
B.3.d. Budget
Total BSennial LCN.3t Budget: $2,958
LCHiZ Balance: $2,958
YATCH: 0
H�TCH BALANCE: 0
B.3.e. Timeline:
Year 1 7/9i 9/95 11/95 1/96 3(96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xxax
Completed 6 meetiags
PRODUCT #2 xxxx
Completed 6 meetings
PRODUCT #4 xx r.xxx
Completed e mee:ings
H.4 Activity: ?i.^.al selection o: 5 neig¢borhoods.
B.4.a. Context w.ithin the project: F?om the initial list
oi 10, stzff will work with zdvisory bozrd and
n_ig:^.borhood lezders to deternine the five neignSornoods
we will work in.
B.4.b. Metbods: N/.4 .
B.4.c. Haterials: N/A
H.4.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $1,479
LC.`4t Balance: 57�479
MATCH: 0
HATCH BALANCE: 0
7
y
�
��- � t�
B.4,e. Timeline:
Yea= 1 7/95 9/95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 XX xxX�c XxxX
List of 5 neighbozhoods
C. Develop and Condnct Survey, Analyze Data
C.1 Activity: Drz£t quest:ozs. 9egin developing survey
tool to be used to zssess the understanding of nonpoint
_=_sues.
C.l.a. Context within the project: Project stz£Y will
develoo dra£t survey cuest_ons b�sed on iniormation
co2lected on r.eic'r.bor:oocs ar.d re=ezrch on nonpoir,t
issues.
C_l.b. MetLods: Sta;ezrd gaicelires °or scrvey tool
cevelooment will '�e a�olied.
C.1_c. Materials: K/A
C.I.d. sudget
Tota1 Siennial LCNR Budget: 51,901
LCHR Balance: $1,90!
Y.ATCH: 0
Y.ATCH BALA27CE: 0
C.l.e. Timeline:
Yezr 1 7/95 4/95 11/55 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xxxx xxxx xx
Draft svrvey ouestior,s
C.2 Activity: Firzl snrvey preperetions_ _Tncludes
working �itn acvisory board zr.d survey aro°essior.zls to
:inzl±me aue=_tions, determiai:g szmale size, compi:i.^.g
catabase, zr.d trai.:ing callers.
C.2.a. Context within the project: All oz the iront er.d
work r.eeded :o execute t}e suzvey will �e dor,e durinq
this p!��se.
C.2.b. Methods: Survey p*o`essionals will cetermine
sample size. zit�er the survey consultznt or the cities
will prov±de datab�=e _`rom chich we draw the samole. Ca�
�ad survey coasvltant will L_T21R paid phone staf£ to
comolete the czlls.
C.2.c_ Matezials: N/A
8
_ _�.. _.5::-4
c.2.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCti� Budget: $2,�47
LCl4t Balzace_ $2,747
HATCH: 0
HATCH BALANCE: 0
C.2.e- Ti.meline:
°.e�r 1 7/95 9/95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODOCT �1 xx xxs.x
°inel survey cvestio�s
PRODUCT #2 xx xX
Sample size
PRGDUCT #3 xxxx
Dztabzse co�oleted
PRODUCT #§ xx
1�ziR c2�leL5
C.3 Activity: Conduct survey.
C.3.a, Context within the project: with this survey we
will assess resicents' kaowledge o£ noanoint pollut:on.
4his in°_ornztion wi!1 :�elp us develop ecucat'_onal
roaterizls which enhaace t;�at xnowledce.
C.3.b. Methods: Using a cuestionnai*e r.o more than 10
n�inutes lona, paid phone st�:E will como!ete t;e survey
calls over a period o£ eicht weeks.
C.3.c. Materials: N/A
C.3.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCY4 Budget: $3�351
LCt�L Bal2nce: $3,351
MATCH: 0
HATCH BAL�A2.'CE: 0
C.3.e. Time�ine:
Yeai 1 7J95 9(95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xx xxxx
Cor,olete calls
C.4 Activity: Analyze data.
C.4.a. Context vithin the project: Results Erom the
svrvey szmole will be comoiled and znalyzed to orovide
findir.gs that c�n be used in educational msterials znd
publically distributed.
C.4.b. Methods: Data will be coded� edited, znd proces=_ed
by the susvey consultznt. Furtber analysis will be mzde
by pYOject stzf£ with inout from bhe advisory board.
0
95-779
�� - ��q
C.4.c. Materials: N/A
C,4.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCMF2 Budget: $4,384
LChLR Ba2ance: $4,384
MATCH: 0
MATCH BALANCE: 0
C.4.e. Tuaeline:
Year 1 7/95 9/95 11/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xx XX
Anzlysis o£ £iadi:tgs
D. Community Organizing
D.2 Activity: Identi:y Dartners within five tareet
r.eighborhoocs. Esta�lish ties withia tT.e neighborhoods
with existing institetions such as resident and busir.ess
aroups� block clubs, and gove-nment. Create partnerships
in zt least two neighborhoods xhich will conr:it to
develon�ent o: dra:� action plans.
D.I.a. Context within the project: Conr.ect with exist*_r.g
i.^.st:,tut:ons so thzt we can beg_a educEtion oa nonnoint
issces. At the saae time we will build the pastae.
needed to ceve!op conmur.ity-5zsed action olzas wh:ch
address the issues.
i7.l.b. Hethods: r!eet in a vzriety of £orums rznqiag fron
mo:.thly neighborhood grouo �eetings to public inforaation
r..eetir.gs znd o:e-o :-ones with bes-ness and po? itical
leaceis.
D.l.c. Haterials: N/A
D.1_d. Budget
Total Biennial LCt42 Budget: $C,648
LCHIi Balance: $4,648
lSA2'CH: 0
HATCH BAI,A_*ICE: 0
D.l.e. Ti.meline: •
Year 2 7/95 9/95 22/95 1/9S 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 Xx XxxX XxXx XXXX
Comnitment Ero� partners in zt least oae aeighbornood
PRODUCT #2 xxxx
Commitment £ror.c partners in at 2east a second aeighbozhood
Year 2 7/96 9/96 11/96 1/47 3/97 S/97
PRODUCT #2 xxxx xx
Comnitment :ron partners in zt 2east a second neiohborhood
10
e
D.2 Activity: P.nzlyze r.eeds znd ootentizl actions. lise
resezrch znd inioraztion co�pi?ed from r.eig?:bo:hood
pZOiiles and edec2tionzl �zterials to identiYy
neichborhood neecs znd poteatial actions to address the;.�.
D.2.a. Context within the project: ?his product will b_
a first cut which will Lhea be used to elicit :nnet :rom
co,�vaunity stakeho'_de.s, the zdvisory board, aad otT.er
interested �zrties.
D.2.b. Hethods: tise info_^ztion coll_cted to ceve?oo
r.e3ghbo.^hood selection criteria znd proEiles. Resezrch
e na�ior.ally asd locelly to improve stormwater
quality.
D.2.c. Haterials: N/?.
D.2.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCHIt Hudget: $10,986
LC".Sit Balance: $10,9E6
MAxcx: 0
MATCki BAI,H27CE: 0
D.2.e. Timeline:
Yezr 2 7(96 9/96 11j96 1)91 3/97 SJ97
PF,ODUCT #1 xxXx xxxx
?.na?ysis of needs and zctions in et ?ezst or.e r.eighbor'�ood
PRODUCT #2 xXxx xxxx Xx
Analysis oE needs znd actio^s ia zt leasL two neighborhooris
D.3 Activity: Neetings on z�alysis of needs and poter.tial
actions.
D.3.a. Context vithin the nroject: Zt is impoTtznt :o
get i»put f*om neig'.;borhood, city, znd state stakeholders
to help ensure support for any flrz:t zction plans.
D.3.b. Hethods: Fortns, o.*.e-on-one meetings, written
input on dra£ts.
D.3.c, Materials: NJA �
D.3.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $3,592
LCHR Balance: $3,592
MATCH: 0
HATCH BALANCE: 0
11
�
95 �
q� -��q
' D.3.e. Timeline:
. Year 2 7/46 9/36 11/46 1/97 3/97 5/97
PRODIICT #1 xx xxxx xx
�� Comoleted 5 meetings on £irst neighborhood analysis
PRODUCT #2 xX xXxx �c�c
.� Conpleted 5 reetings on second ne?ghborhood analysis
D.4 Activity: Drz£t r.eighborhood action plans. ?lzns
b:ozdly outlining the actions that cou!d be taken zt the
ne:chborhood level io imorove stornMater ovality.
D.4.a. Covtext within the project: With conpletion o£
these dra£t plans, neighborhoocs will hzve a blueor±nt in
plzce to pursue sneciiic zctior.s w�hich czn improve
stor. qualiLy.
D.4.b. Hethods: N/�
D.4.c. Haterials_ '�/A
D.4.d. Budget
Total Biennial LC!4t Budget: $=4,895
LC?� Halance: 514,895
MATCH: 0
1+.ATCH HAT,ANCE; 0
D.4.e. Timeline:
Yez� 2 7/96 9/96 ?1/96 1/9J 3/97 5/47
PRODUCT fl xxr.x r.xxx xx
Dra£t zction olzn for one ,-.eichborhood
PRODUCT #2 xxxx xxxx ax
Drait aciion plzn `or second nezghborhovd
E. Develop and Distribute Educztion Mate=ials
E.1 Activity: Research educztional mater±als. 'Iti:o types
o£ rzterizls wi?1 be developed -- r.eichborhood pro£iles
z�d fzctsheets on nor,point pollut:on.
E.l.a. Context within the project: The pro£iles will be
used es pzrt of the corn�unity orcaniziag arocess
cescriSed in objective D. The educational materiz!s will
Y.elp bxoacen the u,derstanding o£ nonpoint pollution
isstes based on results from the svrvey.
E.I.b. Hethods: Much o£ the in£oraatioa compiled durir,g
the r.eighborhood selection process will be used in the
o:ofiles� inclucing= quality and auantity o£ runoi£;
tyoes o£ surface uaters; lar.ci vse; existing and historic
r.atcral Syste;ns; wztershed plans; and population.
12
�esezrch on no:poir.t pollut±on will look at major
pollntznts, legzl structures, and methods used to zddress
the proble� locally,
E.l.c_ Materials: U/A
E.l.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCM.it Budget: $9,718
LCii� Salance: $9,718
?SATCR: 0
NATCH BAT..T_�vCE: 0
E.l.e. Timeline:
lezr 1 7J95 9/95 11J95 1/96 3/96 5/56
PRODUCT #1 xx r.xxx xxYx
Researc:� two neig:�borhood pro£iles
PRODUCT #2 xx xxxx xxxx xx
Research t;ree neig'r.bornood pro£iles
PRODUCT #3 xx xxax xxxx xxxx xx
Researctl ;:onooint £actsheets
E.2 Activity: ur;te neighborhood pro£iles. Comoile zll
relevant in on each o£ the £i�e aeic,hSorhoocs
_nto incivicezl profiles.
E.2.a. Context vithin the pro}ect: These p-o£iles wi?1
be used to ecucate pzrtne:s in the £ive neignbor?�oods and
as a basis °or the ar.alysis o£ needs and creit 2ctioa
D�d:IS.
°.2.b. Hethods: N/A
E.2.c. Naterials: N/A
E.2.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $5,704
LQ�2 Balance; $5,704
HATCH: 0
?SATCH BALA27CE: 0
E.2.e. Timeline:
Year 1 7/95 9J95 il/95 1/96 3/96 5/96
PRODUCT #1 xx Xxxxx xxxX
Five d*z:t r.eighborhood pro:iles
PRODUCT #2 Xxxx xx
liao £iaal neiynborhood profiles -
PRODUCT }3 xxxX xx
Three £in�l neiahborhood pro£iles
E.3 Activity: Write znd design nonpoint pollution
fzctsneets.
13
95
1
q�-��°I
E.3.a. Context within the project: Final production of
factsheets. We are projecting that we wili develop a
series of three nonpoint pollution inEo=mation
brochures/factsheets.
E.3.b. Methods: Project staf£ wi11 draft the natrative
and then seek innut £ram advisory board and stakeholders.
Desiga wi22 be provided by St. Paul and Mir.aeapo2is.
Survey results wi11 also be incorporzted ir.to tn_
materials.
E.3.c. Materials: N/A
E.3_d. audget
Total Bieanial LCHI2 Budget: $6,127
LCMR Balance: $6,127
HATCH: $2�500
HATCH BAI,IiNCE: $2,500
E,3.e. Timeline:
Year 1 7/55 9/95 il/95 1/96 3/96 5/S6
PRODUCT #1 xxXx XxXx
Dra£t narratives
PRO➢UCT #2 , xx
Firzl aaLratives
PBODUCT #3 xxxx
Design layout
PRODUCT #4 xx
Incoroorzte survey results
Year 2 7/96 9/96 21/96 1/9? 3/99 5/97
PRODUCT #2 xxxx
Final nzrratives
PRODUCT #4 xz
Incorporate survey results
E.4 Activity: Print :zctsheets. Pri;.t a series oi three
aonooir.t pollutioa factsheets. Five t:�ousand cooies oi
each.
E.4.a. Context within the project: See activity 'c.l.
E.4.b. Hethods: N/A .
E.4.c. Materials: N/1+. .
E.4.d. Budget
Total Hiennial LCMR Budget: $1,056 �
LCHIi Balance: $1,056
HATCH: 53,500
YJ�TCH BALANCE: $3,500
14
N
E.4.e. Timeline:
vez: 2 7/96 9/96 11/96 1/97 3/91 5/97
PRODUCT �1 xxxx
Prin:ing
E.S Activity: Mzil. Send oet a ser+_es o`_ t`ree nziliags
to 5,000 households in tl?e £ive tzr�eted ae?qhborhoods.
E.S.a. Context wit3ia the project: ihese izcts!:eets will
prov±ce ia:ormztion t0 1:1G�1V1o12� hotseho?cs based on
survey results and resezrch cone.
E.S.b. Methods: x/�
E.S.c. Materials: .Y/A
E.5.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCl�R Budqet: $3,169
LCHI2 Balance: $3,169
MP.TCH: $6,D00
HATCH BALANCE: $6,000
£.S.e. TimeliIIe:
Year 2 7/96 9/96 .il/96 1/97 3/97 5/97
PRODUCT #1 xx
zrinting labels
PRGDUCT #2 xxxx xx
Mailir.g
F. Develop and Conduct Followup Survey, Analyze Dzta
F.1 Activity: Drait Eollowuo survey cuestioas.
F.l.a. Context within the project: Develop a scrvey
product w:�ich helps us neasure t?:e effectiveness of the
factsheets ar.d neiahSorcood orga:,izine.
F.l.b. Methods: S:andard guidelines Po= su=vey :001
cevelopment will be zoplied.
F.l.c. Materials: N/A
F.l.d. Budget .
Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $951
LCY.R Balance: $951
MATCH: 0
MATCH BALANCE: 0
P.l.e. Timeline:
Year 2 7/96 9/96 11/96 1/97 3/97 5/97
PRODUCT #1 xxxx xxx
Dra£t follow�p survey questions
15
95-779 �
3
. i
.. .�r�-:-, :� .-_
F.2 Activity: Finzl £ollowup survey preparations.
SnClvdes working with advisory board and survey
pro£essionz2s to ii�zlize qvestions, determining szmple
size, compiling catzbase, and training callers.
F.2.a. Context vitain tLe project- Coordinzte all of the
£ront end work neeeed to execute the followup scrvey.
F.2.b. 'fethods: Sirvey professioasls will determine
sample size. SitY.er the survey co�sultzr.t or the cities
wi! 1 nrovide dztabase £rom which we drzw the sample. CBE
and survey consult�nt will train paid phoae sta££ to
comnlete the calls.
F.2.c. Y.aterials: N/A
F.2.d. Budget
Total %iennial. LCY•FL Budget: $I,268
LCMR Balance: $1,268
25ATCH: 0
Y.ATCH BAI.ANCc: 0
F.2.e. Timeline:
Year 2 7/96 9/96 il/S6 I/97 3/97 5/97
PRODUCT #1 xx
Final Eollowup survey questicns
PRODUCT #2 aX
Followtp sur�ey samo2e size
PRODUCT #3 aX
➢atzbase conoleted
PRODUCT #4 xx
^rain cal?ers
F.3 Activity: Co:cuct followup survey.
F.3.a. Context wiihia the pzojectc ?!ake calls within tSe
iive ta:cet ,eichborhoocs to �ssess the effectiveness of
educational materials znd community organizing.
F.3.b. Methods: Usir.g a cuestionazire no more than 10
miavtes long, pzid nhone stzff will complete the folloMUp
survey calls over a neriod of eig!:t weeks.
F.3.c. Haterials: N/A �
F.3.d. Budget
Total Biennial LCt9i Budget: $3,595
LClIIi Balznce: $3,595
HATCH: 0
MATCH BALANCE: 0 �
16
9� ���q
F.3.e. Timeline:
Yezr 2 7/96 9/96 11/96 1/97 3/97 5/97
PRODDCT #1 x�c xX
Comolete £ollowup survey calls
r.4 Activity: A,alyze czta.
F.4.a. Context withia the project; Resclts =rom tY.�e
survey will be co-�iled zad anzlyzed to orov±de z
compzrisoz with origiaal survey results.
F.4.b. N,ethods: Data will be wded, edited, zad orocessed
Sy tne survey consultznt. Further zaalysis will be mzce
by oroject sts££ with inoct _`�om the �dvisory�bozrd.
Stzi£ wiil preoare a com�arison o£ U;e two survey
=indines as part of the project evaluation.
F.4.c. Hateiials: N/A
F.4.d. Budget
Total Biennial LC!92 Bvdget: $5,450
LCM.tZ Balance: $S,SSO
HATCH: 0
Y.ATCkI BALANCE: 0
r.4.e. Timeline:
?ear 2 7j96 9/96 71/96 1j97 3j97 Sj97
PRODUCT #1 aX xxxX
?.r.zlysis of findinqs
95 �
3
17
r
�i5 i��
a
V2. Evaluation: The £ollowing criteria will be used to measure the
e£Eectiveness o£ this project:
* Five neighborhoods with diverse characieristics incltded
in the education project.
* Production and distribution o£ £ive neighborhood p=ofiles.
* Producti.on and aistribution of nonpoint source po2lution
educztion materials to 5,000 households.
* Conpletion o£ at least 400 initial surveys.
* Yzrtners in two or more r.ei9hborhoods participatiag in
dzafting zction nlans.
'+ Coordinating work by neighborhood and environmental groups,
and qovernment in creating and +_ssning a conroon message
zbout the problems and solutions of nonpoint source
pollution.
* Comoletion oE zt least 400 followup surveys.
+ Followun survey shows an increase in knowledge of r.onooint
source pollutioa.
VIZ. Context within Pield: T_his project inteqrates wel! with
e�fo:ts at the r.ztior.zl, sta:e, aad 1oca1 level to address non�oi::�
pol2nt:on issves, cor exe�p2e, ssnder the iedera2 Ciean Water Fct,
both St. Pzul znd N.inaezoolis are reqaired to implenent public
education proorzr..s as part of the stormwater perrnitting process.
At the same icae tite ssrban watersk:ed restoration move;,ieZt is
gaxning momentcm and stature nationally. Grouas such zs :Ae
Cozlitioa to Resto. lirban "vizters znd the Urbzn Creeks Council zre
educating oeople at ihe 1ocz1 level on how they can restore and
protect their urben waters using storn:watet mzr.agement, streem baak
restoration, znd storm flrain steaciling. One inaer-city
r,eiyhborhood in Berkeley, Czl±:ornia is reclaimiag a stream by
redesicning a local park.
State policy oz nonnoint sou:ce pollutioa has £ocused mostly oa
rurzl sources sucA as seotic tznks, £eedlots �ad £ield runo££.
however, urban orojects in i!:e Twin cities are finding support f-o:n
the stete. The Metropo2itan Council started a muZti-year r.onooint
pollution education nrogrzm this yezr with £ssading £rom the stzte.
Efforts by the Lzke Phalen eeighborhood in St. Paul-to restoze
wetlznds�have also gotten siroag su�port. This e£iozt has also
been helped greatly by Willizm Moorish throcgh the University of
Minnesota. .
Ovr oroject zlso connects we11 wii;� the Natio�al Pzrk Serv;ce
throvgh its tctivities on the new Mississippi National River and
�2ecreation Area (i�*iR?tA). Nor.point pollution is or.e o£ Y1vRR?'s key
£oci. Another grouo o` players whose goals natch well with ours
are the iwin Cities Watershed Managenent Ozga�izations. These
organizations zre veiy inte:ested in building stronger local
suoport £oz improving nonnoint water cuzlity and wi11 be valuzble
pz:tners £or this progrzm.
16
95 -779
cir.ally, Mir.neapolis' Neighborhood Revitalization ?rocram (NR?) is
ar.other imoortant piece of the pezzle Por tnis nroject.
Miaaeanolis ne:ghborhoods mzy be zble to use resocrces Yrom the NH?
process to dezl with er.viror.mentzl issces such 2s no�poiat source
pollution.
VIII. Budget context: :zc� of the three collaborators �zve budcets
'or work cn cctiviues si�il>r to tSose in the oroject.
3oth St. Paul and Minneapolis hzve stor3xater naaage�eat bedaets
whicn iur.d starf t>me, consnitant contrzcts, stor.�.a.er monitoriag
£e_s, printing costs, postage, nzte. aad eqci?r.�er.t ou;chase.
M.atch±ng dollars for this project will cotte iron these dedicated
iur.ds.
St. Pzul Stormwater Hanagement Budget
1999 - $205,616
1995 - $233,91� - proposed
1996 - $250,000 - nrojected
1997 - 5250,000 - projected
Hinneapolis Stormwater Hanagement Budget
1994 - $350,000
1995 - $400,000 - orojected
1996 - 5600,000 - nrojected
1997 - $700,OG0 - p.
C3c has done cor,unun±ty organizi.^.g ia both Minnezpol_s 2nd St. Pau1
since 1988. Our work hzs £ocused oa water cuzlity po!lution
issues. Curreat plans involve con�unity organizing arovnd nonooint
polletion ar,d other e.^.vironnental issues duzir.g 1995 ar,d 1996
through our Enviroamental Visior.s Program.
CBE Environmental Visions Program Sudqet
1995 - 5100,000
1996 - $11§�000
IX. Dissemination: A£inzl report w?11 be pYepared shoa:,^.q initial_
and £in21 su=vey results. Ir.cl•aded in the report wi11 be an
explar.ation o£ Che educztion progran with exsmples of materials
developed and the neighborhood dra`_t actioa olzns. This report
will be distributed to advisory board me,�ers, project
patticipants, and the media. All three collaborztors will also
make the report available to zny interested pzrties. •
X. Time: N/A
XI. Cooperation:
_ St. Paul - As project maager, Anne Weber will coordin2te the bi-
-� monthly bil!ing Por completed work based on deliverzble oroducts
and negotiate the zgreement with Che state. She will provide iaput
oh work products, in addition to qua:te*ly neetinas with stz£i £_*om
19
a
s
-. = �5-i'��
Minneaoolis �nd CBB znd the zdvisory board to trzck orogress. The
city wi12 grovide, -s needed, inpct £rom public works or other
stzf£ on project workprodncts zs they develop. St. Pzul wili also
supply a portion of the 512,000 reqvired matCh £or designing,
printing, nai2ir.g educational materials.
Hinneapolis - Minaezpolis staf£ Jody Polzin will play a role
simi2ar to Anne's ia the project, with ttte ex.ceptioII o£ the billing
responsibilities. Jody wi11 provide expertise on workproducts and
neet on a quzrterly basis with collaborators znd the sdvisory board
to trac:t nrocress. Min.^.e�?olis wi21 also supply its portion o£ the
512,000 required match `or designina, prir.ting, mailing edvcztionzl
lI1dCEtld � 5.
Gitizeas £or a Better Enviroa. (CBE) - Working closely with t2:e
cities znd acvisory bcazd, Nir.nesota progrzm d+_=ector, Lisa Doerr,
and N.ississ_pni River project coordinator, Emy *fiddletor., will
sta£i this project :or C3E. As nroject coordinztor, ?.my will play
the mzjor ro?e ia impler..enting the project. Lisa wi11 provide
r.,enage^ent and tec7:aical oversieht.
Sta££ t>-�e out into the �ro;ect 5y F.nne Weber as oroject manager
end Jocy Polzia zs techa?ceZ senpo:t has �ot been vua,ti_ied at
this ooir.t 5ecause i �»i:l be con�ted zs in-kind aad is r.ot �art o£
the LQ±R bucce.. The $?2,000 mztch com^,iitted for the oroject w±ll
be io. paynent oi services. :owever� both cities wi11 treck staff
time to orovice infornation to�otk:er pzrties intezested in che
stz:fing recu-remeats oi s±:nil�r projects.
CBE
, A. Administr�tion S�
H. Select Neighborhoods 9§
C. Survey cg
'� D. Commcnity Organizing 34b
E. Educational ?tzterials 268
F. Followup Survey 7$
XIZ. Feportinq Requirements: Semiannuzl six-ronth work�rocram
vodate reports will be su'.�mitted not !ater than January 1, 2996,
Jvly 1, 1996, January 1, 1997, and a£inal six-month workorocram
update znd f:nzl zeport by June 30, 199�. .
20
a
R
e
95-7�9
XII7. Rewired attachments:
1. Quali£ica[ions
Anne Weber
City of St. Paul, Department of Public works
Civil Engineer
�.nne is the civil engir.eer respoasible '_or Zevelopinq St. ?znl`s
M.L`RSC=Dd� Storm hater Dischzrye pernit, w:�ich is recuired under the
federzl C?ez� Water P.ct. TSe nermitting process _nvo?ves
to-ipletiag a two nart nrocess, ?art 1 inc?uced resezrching
existiag 1ega1 zuthority, w�ter quality cztz, aad storm wzter
mznzcerent progrzms. Watershed mapgir,g zad conductiag a field
screening p-ogrzm £or illicit c_sc'r.arces were zlso included. Part
2°ocv�ed on storm wzter quality mo:�icoting znd ceveloping a storm
wzter maazoe�ent procrzn ior t?�e �er�it. St. ?zul received its
permit £*_om the i;innesota Bollut`_on Co�trol T,cency in Mzy i999.
Jody Polzin
City o£ N.inne2polis, Department o£ Public works
Enqineer II
Jocy hzs been assicned s_nce October, i490 to Ni^r.eanolis' Sewer
Des±gn Section as an e�eineer II. Respons�bilities include
reports, desicn, ar.d the planr,:,g oi pTOjec�s to improve the
quality o: stor�wzter ru,off. ?rimery projects incicde:
* Plznaing, budgetina, �nd repocts reouired to meet the liS
cnvironmental Protection Agency's stormwater Tegulations�
* Providing technical zssis:ance as needed £or the Minneapolis
Cha±n o£ Lakes Clean Wzter ?artnership ?.
* Stz`.Eing the Mianeapo2is v:�ter Quality citizer.s :+dvisory
Com��ittee; and
x Assisting stafE on otheY projects such as Combined Sewer
OverElow.
Lajor reports avthored or co-autY.ored since 1990 include:
* N,inneapolis Stormwater Dischzrce hP�c.S Pe:mit F.pplication,
Nove;.uer, 1991�
* Mi;:neapolis Stormwater �ischzrge r?DF.S ?ermit Application,
Nocer.�beY, 1992; znd
* Minneapolis C?�a_n of Lzkes Clean Water Pzrtnership Project,
ImpleTentation Aeport, October, 1993
21
�
R
g5- ���
Lisa Doerr
Citizens £or a Better Enviromaent (CBS)
Minnesota ProgLam Director
Lisa joined CB� in Jur.e, 1990 a£ter serving £or three years zs
peblic outzesch direc�or for the N,innesota Public Interest Research
Group (MPS3G). She hcs overseen extensive ca.�vrcvnity oraanizing
work by CB% t7:rovohout t'�e 3win Cities znd Greater M_nnesota. Lisa
has also done legislztive and legal work on a wine vzriety o£
issees. �ecent zccompL•'sh�ents inclace:
� Heloing to organize the ?±ississ=pni Corridor Neighborhood
Cozlition znd comn±le zn ?nviroaaental ?r.ventorV oi the area;
*:.vthoring the 1993 report, Get To Rr.ow Yovr Z,ocal Pollvter;
P=o£iles o£ Minne<_ota's Too 40 Toxic Pollcters;
* Writir,g �nd passiag legislation c:eating the nation's £irst
state-ren comrun?ty assistance proaram on pollution
pzever.tion; and
* Helo3ng ihe N,etropolitan Fzete Control Commis_ion estzblish
a oollutio� �reveatzon oroerzm within its i.dustrizl
cisc'r,zrger perrit syste�, y
Fany Dtiddleton
Citizens £or a Better Envirovoent (CBE)
liississippi River Project Coordinator
A,r,y worked at C's� ior two years between 1987 to i989 ar,d �oined ovr
st�ii again in Ja.^.va.-y, 2993 coorcinztir.g our Mississi�oi 3iver
Project. Sbe specizlizes i� orovidinq technical support to river
co:nmenities _ron P.no'sa to Winoaz, Minnesota zs oart oi C3E's Good
reiahbor projecL. She has a Bachelor o£ Science degree in L�nd znd
W�ter Har,zger,�ent :rom Michicza State u»versity.
Recent zccomp2ish;ner,ts inclace:
Aethoring a report, irom Point to ?:onooir.t: ?roiectina the
?:ississiooi Ai�er's Pnture, a review o£ Clezn F�zter Act
co�p2iance by a11 0£ the N,ississippi Hiver point polluters
iron N:nr.eatio2is to t;�e 7;eacw��ters;
* Coordinating _npnt from local communities and environmentzl
c.-oups oa the n�nagement plzn o£ the ?dissis=ipni National
River and Recreational Area; and
* Pvblishing a reoort, Mississiooi �iver: A mzrnished ?=esent
a;.d UncerLZin Futvre, cocvmenTing ioxic m�ss loadir.gs to the
river in the Twin Cities.
22