95-709ORIGINAL
Presented
Referred 7
Council File # qs 7� 9
Green Sheet # 33430
1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certified and approved the 7une 20,1995,
2 decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer:
3
4 Propertv Ap�ealed ellant
5
6 1018 Caroll Avenue Lee and Betty Walker
7 Decision: Appeal granted regazding condemnation and order to vacate.
8
9 391 Pleasant Avenue R. David Reynolds
10 Decision: Appeal denied regarding replacement or repair to furnace/boiler.
11
12 748 Linwood Avenue David P. Falconer and Shoshana Englard-Falconer
13 Decision: Variance granted to the rain leader ordinance for five years.
14
15 614 Grand Avenue Ted Dooley on behalf of Malloy-Bathurst
16 Condominium Association
17 Decision: Variance granted to the rain ]eader ordinance for five yeazs.
18
19 468 South Warnick Street John and Jenay Poidinger
20 Decision: Variance denied to the rain leader ordinance.
21
22 FURTHER ItESOLVED, this action shall become effective immediately upon approval of the Mayor.
Requested by Department of.
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
�
Adopted by Council: Date � 55
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
BY� �(���r.--,�-�-
Approved b yor: Date � � �—
g ' "v
�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
�
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ��
95-70 9
c�ty coun� l � GREEN SHEE N_ 3343U
CONTACT PEFSON & PHONE INITIAL/OATE INIT�AIJOATE
a DEPAR"IMENi DIR£CiOR O CIT! CAUNC7L
Gerry Strathman 266-5575 A���N OqTYATfORNEY �CfTYCLERK
MU5T BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (�ATE) pQ��FOR O BUOGEf DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
June 28 1995 OflDEq O MpyOR (ORASSISTAPfT) �
TOTAL # OP SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACf10N REQUESTED:
Approving the decision of the Legislat�ve Hearing:Officer on Property Code Enforcement
Appeals for property at 1018 Carroll Avenue, 391 PleasanC Avenue, 748 Linwood Avenue,
614 Grand Avenue and 468 South Warwick Street.
RECOMMENDnTiONS: ApProve (A) or Reject (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOL40WINCa QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a crontract for this department? �
_ CIB COMMRTEE _ YES NO
_ STAFF 2. Has this person�rm ever been a city employee?
— YES NO
_ o1S7RIC7 COURT _ 3. Does this personttirm possess a skill not normally possessetl by any current ciry employee?
SUPPOqT$ WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explain ell yes answers on separa�e sheet and attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITV (Who, What, When. Where, Why);
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED:
�ISADVANTACaES IFAPPROVED'
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED iC1RCLE ON� YES NO
FUNOIIiG SOURCE ACTIVITV NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)