Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
95-494ORIGI�IAL
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented by
Referred To
Conncil File # q S� ` q�
Green Sheet # o� �o `� S�
��
Committee Date
1 WF3EREAS, issues of appropriate design, including consistency, basic form, color, signage and lighting arise in
2 connection with skyway system maintenance and eapansion; and
3 WE-�REAS, issues involving public systems and development standards that affect the quality of the public space
4 downtown require carefizl review with awazeness of downtown plans and objectives; and
5 VJHEREAS, the Planning Commission has established a downtown urban design task force to address design-related
6 issues;
7 Tf�P.EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council requests that the Planning Commission's downtown urban
8 design plan task force review and comment on any recommendations to come before the City Council concerning
9 skywry design, maintenance, and expansion that will have significant impact on public space downtown and on any
10 relat< d need for revision of the skyway design policy, and
11 BE 1T : URTF3ER RESOLVED, that this request does not in any way change the responsibility of the Skyway
12 Goveinance Committee established in Section 140.01 of the Legislative Code.
13
Requested by Department of:
Adopted'�y Council: Date
Adopt: m Certified by Council Secretary
By: a.
App:nve•1 by Mayor � a G /
B Y' --
�
Form Approved by Ciry Attorney
�
Appmved by Mayor for Submission to Council
�
q�� ysy
OEPAF27MENT/OfFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED IV� 2 6 9 5 9
. c �n�il . GREEN SHEE
INITIAIJOATE INITIAVDATE
CONTA PERSON & PHONE � OEPAflTMENT DIREGTOR � CI'iY COUNCIL
Th e 6-8620 ^�" O CRY ATfO{iNEY O CIT( CLEFK
MUST BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (OATE) NUYBER fOP O BUDGET DIRECTOR � FIN. 8 MGi SEFVICES DIP
FiOUTING
OBDEP a MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn �
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SICaNATUR�
ACTION REQUESTED: .
That the Planning Coffiission's Downtown Urban Design Plan Task Force review and comment
on any skyway deisgn issues that come be€ore the Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Apprwe (A) or Reject (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TME FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PL4NNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has this personffirm ever worked under a contract for this tlepartment?
` C�8 cAMMITrEE _ YES NO
_ STAFF 2. Has this personttirm ever been a city employee�
— YES NO
_ DiS7A1Cr COURT _ 3. Does this personRirm possess a skill not normally pouessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNQL OBJECTIVE? YES NO -
Explaln all yes answers on sepera[e sheet and attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (Who, What. When. Where. Why):
No current group is designated to review skyway design issues.
AOVANTAGES IF APPROVED�
Council will have input from an informed group.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED.
None.
DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
No input on skyway design issues.
TO7AL AMOUNT OF 7RANSACTION $ COS7/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIWG SOURCE ACTIVITV NUMBEH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)