95-447�R1GlNAL
L `-' City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXtNG TiME OF HEARlNG THEREON
a
s
COUNCI FILE NO. �� �
BY
Ffle No. 59378 �TJ �?
Voting Assessment No. 387$
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
5 ReconstrucCion of sidewalk on both sides Norton Street from
W. Lawson Ave. to W. Cook Ave.
Preliminary Order 93-1057 approved July 27, 1993
FinalOrder 93-1280 approve�l August 31, 1993
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been
submitted to the Council, and the Councff having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, theiefoxe, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
ftESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 21st day of
June, 1995, at 3:30 P.M, & , in the CouncIl Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance gve notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, staUng in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
@� Id1 tCUeR
MAY 27 i995
COUNCILPERSON
Yea Nays
Blakey
G amm
�erin
���rris
✓�� �Megard �/ j�
I/ Rettman �'rriune
��Se v. �
�
�2In Favor
� Against
� ��aSch�
Adopted by the Council: Date ��`�`'�
Certi� Passed by Council Secretary
Mayor
��s ys��
Public Hearing Date - June 21, 1995 AE 4-14-95
FMS — Real Bstate Division Date: t,-5-95 Green Sheet Nnmber. 34347
DFPA1�171ffiKl' DIRECPDR CCIY COUNCII.
ntact Pexsoa and Phone N�ber ..e. Q2Y ATPDRNEY CTTY CLHRK
.,ee.�u
Peter 'White 266-8850 � T��� D�'•C�R .� MGi: SVG DIR.
YOR (OR ASSISIANI) 1 na7 Reseaxch
uutxonCovnaAgenaaby.�5-3-95 Must be in Council Research 0££' -
# OF S[GNATURE PAGPS 1 (CLIP ALL IACA'IIOI3S POR SIGNATURL�
cnoxxe�uFSi�: Setting date of public hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
'mprovements on NORTON STREET.
ile No. 59378 A�ment Na 3878
RECOMIHHVDATIONS AI'PROVS (A) OR REIECA' (R) PERSONAL SERVICZ CONIRt1C15 M[1S1' ANSWER THL' FOI-IAWING:
PIANNING COA�A�IIS40N A Sl'AFF 1. Has the jxisov/fum ever wo�ed under a mnhact for this departmrnt? YES N
C[VII. SERVICE COMM _ 2 Has this puson/6zm ever been a Gty employee? YFS N
QB CAMMI'PTEE 3. Dces this person/fum posess a sLitl uot normatly pos¢ted by any
- Cu[rent G5ty employee? YE.S N
POR75 WIIICH COiJN(R..OBTf.CI1VL? Neighborhoods
Faptain all YES aosweis on a separate sheet and amch.
COi�NCII. WARD(S�: 5 D'utrict Planning Council: 6
II�ITlATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPO TIJNIT'Y (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
roject.
DVANTAG 1FAPP E : ""�'"-^ �"" � �� -
Same as above_ - � � e �
�;��
DISAD VANTAGES IF APPRO VED:
enefitted property owners have assessments payable via properry taxes.
DISADV AGFS IF NOT APPROVED:
o not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
otal Amount of Transacuon $ 1,354.97 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 1,083.71 PIA 1994
$ 27126 ASSESSMENTS
unding Source Activity Number
inancial Information: (EJCplain)
3 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.