95-1095Council File # �� �j
�' �
RESOLUTtON
41NT PAUL, MlNNESOTA
Green Sheet # � �eq S O
40
Presented by
Referred To
Couunittee Date
1 BE TT RE50LVF,D, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certified and approved the September
2 5,1995, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer:
3 Pr�ertv Appealed
4 719 Wilson Avenue
5 Decision: Deny Appeal
Aovellant
6 359 Maria Avenue Michael McCarty
7 Decision: Grant the appeal on the e3cteriot paint on the condition that the rest of the items will be taken care of by
S the September 13 Council meeting
9 549 Dayton Avenue Jim Swick/Ray Petterson
10 Decision: Grant a 30 day eatension on the fascia, 40 days for the porch, and 90 days to complete the painting on the
11 front and rear of the building, with the understanding the painting on the sides of the building will be done
12 uathespring.
13 292-308 Ruth Street
14 Decision: Grant the appeal with the understanding that carbon monoacide testers will be instailed in individual units
15 365 Michigan
16 Decision: Grant the appeal for one year
1
q5-1o45
1 710 Lincoin Harry and Elizagbeth Fair
2 Decision: Grant a five year variance from the rainleader ordinance for the west side of the house, but not the east
3 side
4 FURTHER RESOLVED, that this action shall become effective ixnmediately upon approval of the
5 Mayor.
�����&ti��
Requested by Depart�nent of
�
Form Approved by City Attomey
�
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
B - R
Approved by May r DatB � k S
�':
Adopted by Council: Date � �qq C
City Council
Stratfiman 266-8575
Sept. 13, 1995
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
qs,�b
GREEN SHEE N_ 26950
INITIAVDATE �NITIAVDATE �
DEPARTMENTDIRE OCITYCOUNCIL
CITV ATfORNEY � CIN CLERK
BUDGET DIRECTOR a FIN. & MCai SERVIC DIR.
MAYOR(ORASSISTAN� �
9/5J95
FOP
(CLIp ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Approving the decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Property Code Enforcement
Appeals for the September 5, 1995, meeting.
RECOMMENDATIONS Approve (F) or Re�ect (F)
_ PLANNMG COMMISS�ON _ GVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
_ GIB COMMITTEE —
_ STAFF —
_ OISTRICTCO�RT —
SUPPOflTS WHICH COUNGIL O&IECTIVE?
INITIATIN6 PROBLEM,
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED'
AMOUNT OF 7RANSACTION
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESiIONS:
7. Has this parsoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this tlepartment?
YES NO
2. Has this personRnm ever been a ciry employee�
YES NO ��
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not narmally possessed by any curreM city employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
COST/REYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE)
YES NO
FUNDitdG SOUFCE ACTNITY NUMBER
FINANCIAI MFORM0.TION: (EXPIAIN)