95-1014Presented by
Referred To
1
2
3 Property Appealed
� ���� � ��
� I � 31 `�-- i
RESOLUTION
TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Appellant
4 853 Juno Robert Roscoe
5 Decision: Crrant variance to rainleader ordinance for another five years
Council File # q_�� ��
Green Sheet # a� �9 _y 9
6 � � � �. , C . '�-c
7 ?��.�,�-�..T ��.=pr2Ye:3� Ee�e E�'orc�men o - 5 - rneefing— .
S e�a� . s L�•51_
l�� �
8 1434 Grand Avenue Wiliiam Hite S � 3 C;� c�� ,
9 Decision: Crrant one yeaz extension to complete electrical work ��
�
10 62 So Dale Street Malloy Bathurst Condominiums
11 Decision: Deny variance on door closers
12 Crrant variance on outlets and locks
13 F[JRTHER RESOLVED, that this action shall become effective immediately upon approval of the Mayor.
Requested by Department o£
�
Form Approved by City Attomey
�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
�
Approved by
�
BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certified and approved the August 15,
1995, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer:
Adopted by Council: Date ��� 3 � q �
i
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�1s - I
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/GOUNdL DATE INITIATED N� 2 6 9 4 9
c�c coun��i s�ls�9s GREEN SHEE
INITIAVDATE INITIAUDATE
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOB O CITV COUNqL
Gerr Strathman 266-8575 ASSIGN oCITVATTORNEV �CITYCLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCILAGENDA BY (OATE) H�wBEp wR � BUOGET DIRECTOR O FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
ROUTING
All USt 23 1995 OHOEH OMAVOR(ORASSISTANn �
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION qEQUESTED:
Approving the decision o£ the Legislative Hearing Officer on Property Code Enforcement
Appeals for the August 15, 1995, meeting.
RECAMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Re�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNMG COMMISSION _ qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Ha5 this pEr50Nfirm ever WOtked undef a ContrdCt for thls deparlment?
_ CIB COMMITfEE VES NO
2. Has this personttirm ever been a ciry employee�
_ STAFF — YES NO
_ oiS7RlCT COURr — 3. Does this personRirm possess a skili not normally possessetl by any current c�ry employee�
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNQI O&IECTNE7 YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (Who, What, When, Where, Why)
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED.
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED�
TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION $ COSUREVENUE BODGETED (CIflCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDIfdG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION. (EXPLAIN)