95-1�� � ORIGiNAL
Council File # � /
Green Sheet # 29548
Presented
Referred
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAUL, MtNNESOTA
COn¢aittee: Ddte
!
RESOLVED: That the Parking Lot/Ramp License (I.D. #32040) currently held by G M T
Corporation dba L B C Parking Ramp at 255 6th St. E., be and the same is
hereby renewed.
�.-��r��� Requested by Department of:
$Y:
ApD:
By:
Office of License, Insnections and
Environmental Protection
�:
(�.�- ��'-{<�
Form Approved by City Attorney
BY: ��"Y/ i � • '� �!� ��' JV � ��
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
BY:
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
-
q5'�
DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATE INIYIATED 1 V� 2 9 5 4 8
LIEP/License Administration GREEN SHEE
CONTACf PEfiSON 8 PHONE INRIAVDATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENTD�flECTOR �CITYCOUNdL
Christine Roaek/266-9114 AuIGN �CRVATfORNEV �dNCLEflK
NUYBERFOA
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) pOUi1NG � BUDGET OIREGTOR � FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIFi.
CONSENT AGENDA OROER ❑ MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) O
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS POR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUE5TED: .
Renewal of a Parking Lot/Ramp license (I,D. //32040)
RECOMMENDATIONS: Apprave (A) o� Feject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTqACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
_ PIANNING CAMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has this personttirm ever worketl untler a contract for this tlepartment?
_ CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO
_ STAFF Z. Has this personHirm ever been a city employee?
— YES NO
_ DIS7R�C7 COUR7 — 3. Does ihis personttirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city emplqree?
SUPPORTSWHICHCqUNCliO&IECTIVE4 YES NO
Explein all yes answets on seperete sheet and ettech to gfeen Sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (Who, Whe1. When. Where, Why):
G M T Corporation dba L B C Parking Ramp requests Council approval o£ the renewal of the
Parking Lot/Ramp License at 255 6th St. E. Phil Byrne and Robert Kessler have reviewed the
application and have agreed that the LIEP Office may now forward it to the Saint Paul Ci.ty
Council. The LIEP Office recommends approval.
ADYANTAGESiFAPPROVED
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED:
G� F�3S��i'�1 �9if��
�EC 1 9 1Q�4
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO:
`
If Council approval is not received, applicant will be scheduled for a review before a
hearing officer.
70TAL AMOUNT OF TpANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGEiED (CIRCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDIIdG SOURCE ACTIVITV NUMBEH
FINANCIPL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)