08-1409:
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
IL FILE O. UO '
1
i3o. 1907
Votiag ward 2
Green 5heet No . �� � r's3 7
In the Matter of improving the brick alley in Summit Court, being a
Rearrangement of Terrance Court by grading and paving with brick. (Bounded
by Grand Hi11/Summit Court, Summit Avenue, Lawton Street and Summit Court),
also,
Ia the Matter of condemning and taking an easement in the land necessary
for the slopes, cuts and fills, including right of removal of lateral
support from subject land or land remainder thereof, occasioned by
excavation thereof or construction of slopes in the grading and paving with
brick the alley in Summit Court, being a Rearrangement of Terrance Court.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the
Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approve with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $77,512.27 financed by
assessments.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 21s day of
Sanuary, 2009, at 5:30 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall
and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the
manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the
nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
Yeas Nays Absent
Bostrom �
Carter ,�
Harris ,/
Helgen ✓
Lantry ✓
Stark �
Thune ✓
Adopted by the Council: Date: ���a!/��2��i�A
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
�Y�! /����iliis�
���j /� %�� ��-a5 bzQ� s�
� Mayor
�,��,y��
Sutnmarv of En¢ineerina Recommendations
Report Prepazed November 19, 2008
Final Order EIeating
PR03ECT
Improve the brick alley in Summit Court, being a Rearrangement of Terrace Court (Bounded by Grand Hill
! Sumnut Caurt, Sumwit Avenue, Iawton Street and Summit Court) by grading and paving with brick.
Also, condemning and taldng an easement in the land necessary for the slopes, cuts and fills, including
right of removal of lateial suppart from subject land or land remainder thereof, occasioned by excavarion
thereof or construcfion of slopes in the grading and paving of said alley.
INITIATING ACTION
This impxovement was iniriated by a peririon signed by 73% of the abutting property owners.
The alley is platted 20 feet wide. The alley is paved. The surface of the alley is brick.
Grade the alley to a width of 20 feet and place salvaged and replacement brick.
ESTIMATED COST AND FINANCING
Esrimated Conshucrion Cost
Engineering and Inspecrion
Service Fee
Miscellaneous
Estixnated Total E�cpenditures
$48,294.24
14,488.28
5,070.90
9.658.85
$77,512.27
Financing - Assessments
Estimated Rate per Assessable Foot
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
Not yet scheduled.
SOURCE OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
$77,512.27
$155.00
For additional information, contact Pete Gallagher at 651-266-6085
SiIMMARY OF RECOMNIENDATIONS
The Deparanent of Public Works recommends that tlus project be constructed.
Respectfully submitted,
Dan Haak
Project Engineer
� Green Sheet Green Sheet
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
ny.ltLnr
�
v� ,-�v
OepartmenVOfficelCounciL• � Date Initiated: � '
I PW_PublicWorks i ZaNO�-0$ Green Sheet NO: 3064537
� �
� Contact Person & Phone: I Deoartment Sent To Person InitiallDate �
� PetO GallBghe� I y 0 Public Works I �blic Works '
�
I 266$085 � 1 Council Ma Erickson `
� I 2 Ciri Cierk I CiN C7erk-SLari Moore
I Must Be on Council Agenda by {Date): � Num6er i
24DEG08 For �
Routing '
Doc. Yype: OTHER (DOESNT FIT ANY Order
� CATEGORI� �
E-Document Required: N �
Document Contact: Juan Ortiz
ConWd Phone: 2668864
- Total # of Signature Pages� (qfp Ail Locations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Sei date of hearing to unprove the brick alley in Summit Court, being a reazrangement of Tenace Court (bounded by Grand
HilU5ummit Court, Summit Ave, Lawton Sheet and Summit Court)
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Foilowing Questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this perso�rm ever worked under a coniract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civii Service Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a aty employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
_ current ciry employee?
Yes No
Explain ail yes answers on separete sheet and altach to green sheet.
Initiffiing Prob{em,lssues, OppoAUnity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The improvement was iniriated by a petition signed by 73 % of the property owners.
AdvanWges IfApproved:
Drainage in the alley will be improved.
Disadvantages IfApproved:
Normal problems associated with construction such as noise, dust, and general disruption will occw. �
I
DisadvanWges If NotApproved: �
�
Total Amount of $�� 512.27
- Transaction: CosURevenue Budgeted: Y .
Funding Source: ASSBSSfI'1Bf1lS pctivity Number.
Financial Information: I
I (Euplain) .
i
December 11, 2008 3:00 PM Page 1