Loading...
02-386CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN IL F NO. �Z+ 3�Ie � { Q PRELIMINARY ORDER .,. . . . . BY Fi No.S02036,502037,502043,502050, -- S02 54,502062,502080,502085 Voting Ward_ 1,5,6 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or aew construction at the following locations: 502036 - Both sides Ashland Avenue from Dale Straet to Keat Street. 502037 - Both sides Ashland Avenue from North St. Albans Street to North Dale Street 502043 - Both sides Marshall Avenue from Mackubin Street to Arundel Streat. 502050 - Plast side North Dale Streat from Holly Avenue to Ashland Avenue. 502054 - Both sides Jameson Streat from Front Street to Orchard Street & North side Front Avenue from Jameson Street to North Grotto Street. 502062 - Both sidas Selby Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street. 502080 - Both sides East Ivy Avenue frosn Ruth Straet to Hyacinth Aveaue. 502085 - Both sides East Arlington Avenue from Hazel Street to Furness Parkway. oa -��b *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.49 per froat foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.59 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.69 per square foot. A11 cornar residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 teet of new or reconstxucted sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimatad to be approximataly $6.35 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approvad with no alternatives, and that the estimatad co5t thereof is *SEE ABOVE for astimated coastruction rates, financad by assessments and 2002 Public �nprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing ba had on said improvement on the 22' day of Mav 2002 5:30 o'clock P.M. in tha Council Chambers of the City 8a11 and Court Housa Building in the City of Saiat Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the tisne and place of hearing, the nature of the improvemant and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �BOStroxn ✓Eoleman ✓fiarris vLantry ✓�eitar �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date� �=�— Cartified Passed by Council Secretary �or �� � : Works - Sidewaik Division :T PEFSON S PFKKJE Tvedt (26E60871 OFSIGNANREPAG6 z�. ReconsWd Sidewalk in Wards 1. 5& 6 FOR SIGNAiLR� GREEN SHEET iNma�un� DEPAFi7MENT DIRECTOR CRV ATtOflNEY BUDGEf DIRECTOR MAYOR (OR ASS15TANT) �t; �F-z>-(� NO. 110�445 INfiIAUOPTE ❑CITYCOUNCIL �� — ❑ C�TY CLERK ❑ FlN. S MGT. SERYICE$ dR Q Council Research _CIVILSERYIGECOMMISSqN 7. Hd5tl1i5PBt50�m1eVCrNro(kEdullderaCWlt2ClforiF115dEp2rtRIBM? ___________ YES NO — 2. Has tl�is persor✓firtn ever baen a ciry employee? — YES NO _ 3. Does ttiiis persoNfirm possess a sldll rat �rortnaly possessed by any wrrent ciry e�byee? YES NO � � Explain afi yes answers on aeparMe sheet and attaeh to green sheet INRV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEHE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemicat addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuk. � �±eaarGh �S�I�:� ��� -� �.� zoa2 Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haH the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resufting in ihe expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 76,$HG.GB COSTIREVET3LiE HUDGEiED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No souRCe 02-M-0673 A. PIA � 610,000 B. AST = 380,000 pCIN1TY NUMBER CO2-2T755-0784-00000 MFORMATON:IEXPlAM) CITY OF ST. PAUL COUN IL F NO. �Z+ 3�Ie � { Q PRELIMINARY ORDER .,. . . . . BY Fi No.S02036,502037,502043,502050, -- S02 54,502062,502080,502085 Voting Ward_ 1,5,6 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or aew construction at the following locations: 502036 - Both sides Ashland Avenue from Dale Straet to Keat Street. 502037 - Both sides Ashland Avenue from North St. Albans Street to North Dale Street 502043 - Both sides Marshall Avenue from Mackubin Street to Arundel Streat. 502050 - Plast side North Dale Streat from Holly Avenue to Ashland Avenue. 502054 - Both sides Jameson Streat from Front Street to Orchard Street & North side Front Avenue from Jameson Street to North Grotto Street. 502062 - Both sidas Selby Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street. 502080 - Both sides East Ivy Avenue frosn Ruth Straet to Hyacinth Aveaue. 502085 - Both sides East Arlington Avenue from Hazel Street to Furness Parkway. oa -��b *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.49 per froat foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.59 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.69 per square foot. A11 cornar residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 teet of new or reconstxucted sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimatad to be approximataly $6.35 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approvad with no alternatives, and that the estimatad co5t thereof is *SEE ABOVE for astimated coastruction rates, financad by assessments and 2002 Public �nprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing ba had on said improvement on the 22' day of Mav 2002 5:30 o'clock P.M. in tha Council Chambers of the City 8a11 and Court Housa Building in the City of Saiat Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the tisne and place of hearing, the nature of the improvemant and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �BOStroxn ✓Eoleman ✓fiarris vLantry ✓�eitar �In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date� �=�— Cartified Passed by Council Secretary �or �� � : Works - Sidewaik Division :T PEFSON S PFKKJE Tvedt (26E60871 OFSIGNANREPAG6 z�. ReconsWd Sidewalk in Wards 1. 5& 6 FOR SIGNAiLR� GREEN SHEET iNma�un� DEPAFi7MENT DIRECTOR CRV ATtOflNEY BUDGEf DIRECTOR MAYOR (OR ASS15TANT) �t; �F-z>-(� NO. 110�445 INfiIAUOPTE ❑CITYCOUNCIL �� — ❑ C�TY CLERK ❑ FlN. S MGT. SERYICE$ dR Q Council Research _CIVILSERYIGECOMMISSqN 7. Hd5tl1i5PBt50�m1eVCrNro(kEdullderaCWlt2ClforiF115dEp2rtRIBM? ___________ YES NO — 2. Has tl�is persor✓firtn ever baen a ciry employee? — YES NO _ 3. Does ttiiis persoNfirm possess a sldll rat �rortnaly possessed by any wrrent ciry e�byee? YES NO � � Explain afi yes answers on aeparMe sheet and attaeh to green sheet INRV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEHE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemicat addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuk. � �±eaarGh �S�I�:� ��� -� �.� zoa2 Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haH the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiil generate more personal injury suits, resufting in ihe expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 76,$HG.GB COSTIREVET3LiE HUDGEiED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No souRCe 02-M-0673 A. PIA � 610,000 B. AST = 380,000 pCIN1TY NUMBER CO2-2T755-0784-00000 MFORMATON:IEXPlAM)