01-785CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
COUNCI FSLE N0. � � � ' �I �S �O
By
File No.S�1085,5 1090,501091,S01095-
501097,501101,501119,501122
Voting Ward_ 1-7
Ia the Mattar of sidacvalk reconstruction and/or new coastructioa at the followiag
locations:
501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue.
501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street.
501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West
side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth
Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller
Avenue.
501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate
Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley
Avenue.
501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street.
501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street.
o t -`1 �'S
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per £ront �oot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
r/B nanav
�Xakey
�Bf� strom
; �Col eman
arris
Lantry
y�eiter
� In Favor
QAgainst
i
1or
Adopted by Council: Date Y-�� 2'f7p�
LJ
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
: Works - Sidewalk Division
:7PEHSON S PHONE
Tvedt (266-608�
E ON COUNqLAGENDA BV (DA7�
�i / /�-U
NO. 110439
CtTYCOVNCIL _�
CRY CLEHK
FlN. S MGT. $ERVICES dR
.�
F
�
a
z
:
�
ReconsWd Sidewalk in Ward �
v+MCX colxdpL OBIECf ivE?
�GREEN SHEET
INfTIAVpATE
�DEPARTMENTDIRECfOR
�GfNATTORNEY
� &)OGEf DIflEGfOfl
� MRYOFi (OR ASSISfANT)
PERSONAL SFRVICE COHiRACTS YUST ANfWER TtiE FO�LOWPIG IX1EST10NS:
7. Hastltispe'soNfirtneverworkeAUnderacontrac[forthistleparhneM?
YES NO
2. 4iasics persaNfirtn everbeen a dty ertpbyee?
YES P�
3. Does this persaMi�m p� a�08 na twmie�N Possessed bY anY curteM Cig' enwioyee?
YES NC3
E�lein dl yas a�rowe's on separate sheet aM attaeh te g�aen sheet
The prob�em 'defective sidewalk' was caused by muttip� problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, exheme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it
yrould be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private coMractors generating public sec2or jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc6on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allo�vLh�: i�firas��te � sic�ev�c s�etcf�a e�eriora#e, wfl� in ium, wili generate more personal injury
suiis, resulting in ihe �genc�re �largea do�ar arar�r�rNs in+�ra;�s and replacement as welta�c��'m payouts.
Cot�t� t�ssarch �er
JUL 2 �i 2001
IOUM OF TpANSACT1pN S 3v � i Rv. o� COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� Q NO
souace Ol-M-0672 A. P = , pC�{y�{yNUMBER �1-2T�54-0784-00000
INFORMA770N:(D�WN) • ° 1 ' _ . .�a_,..�___' _ �
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
COUNCI FSLE N0. � � � ' �I �S �O
By
File No.S�1085,5 1090,501091,S01095-
501097,501101,501119,501122
Voting Ward_ 1-7
Ia the Mattar of sidacvalk reconstruction and/or new coastructioa at the followiag
locations:
501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue.
501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street.
501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West
side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth
Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller
Avenue.
501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate
Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley
Avenue.
501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street.
501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street.
o t -`1 �'S
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per £ront �oot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
r/B nanav
�Xakey
�Bf� strom
; �Col eman
arris
Lantry
y�eiter
� In Favor
QAgainst
i
1or
Adopted by Council: Date Y-�� 2'f7p�
LJ
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
: Works - Sidewalk Division
:7PEHSON S PHONE
Tvedt (266-608�
E ON COUNqLAGENDA BV (DA7�
�i / /�-U
NO. 110439
CtTYCOVNCIL _�
CRY CLEHK
FlN. S MGT. $ERVICES dR
.�
F
�
a
z
:
�
ReconsWd Sidewalk in Ward �
v+MCX colxdpL OBIECf ivE?
�GREEN SHEET
INfTIAVpATE
�DEPARTMENTDIRECfOR
�GfNATTORNEY
� &)OGEf DIflEGfOfl
� MRYOFi (OR ASSISfANT)
PERSONAL SFRVICE COHiRACTS YUST ANfWER TtiE FO�LOWPIG IX1EST10NS:
7. Hastltispe'soNfirtneverworkeAUnderacontrac[forthistleparhneM?
YES NO
2. 4iasics persaNfirtn everbeen a dty ertpbyee?
YES P�
3. Does this persaMi�m p� a�08 na twmie�N Possessed bY anY curteM Cig' enwioyee?
YES NC3
E�lein dl yas a�rowe's on separate sheet aM attaeh te g�aen sheet
The prob�em 'defective sidewalk' was caused by muttip� problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, exheme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it
yrould be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private coMractors generating public sec2or jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc6on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allo�vLh�: i�firas��te � sic�ev�c s�etcf�a e�eriora#e, wfl� in ium, wili generate more personal injury
suiis, resulting in ihe �genc�re �largea do�ar arar�r�rNs in+�ra;�s and replacement as welta�c��'m payouts.
Cot�t� t�ssarch �er
JUL 2 �i 2001
IOUM OF TpANSACT1pN S 3v � i Rv. o� COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� Q NO
souace Ol-M-0672 A. P = , pC�{y�{yNUMBER �1-2T�54-0784-00000
INFORMA770N:(D�WN) • ° 1 ' _ . .�a_,..�___' _ �
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER
COUNCI FSLE N0. � � � ' �I �S �O
By
File No.S�1085,5 1090,501091,S01095-
501097,501101,501119,501122
Voting Ward_ 1-7
Ia the Mattar of sidacvalk reconstruction and/or new coastructioa at the followiag
locations:
501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue.
501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street.
501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West
side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue.
501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth
Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller
Avenue.
501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate
Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley
Avenue.
501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street.
501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street.
o t -`1 �'S
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per £ront �oot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
r/B nanav
�Xakey
�Bf� strom
; �Col eman
arris
Lantry
y�eiter
� In Favor
QAgainst
i
1or
Adopted by Council: Date Y-�� 2'f7p�
LJ
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
: Works - Sidewalk Division
:7PEHSON S PHONE
Tvedt (266-608�
E ON COUNqLAGENDA BV (DA7�
�i / /�-U
NO. 110439
CtTYCOVNCIL _�
CRY CLEHK
FlN. S MGT. $ERVICES dR
.�
F
�
a
z
:
�
ReconsWd Sidewalk in Ward �
v+MCX colxdpL OBIECf ivE?
�GREEN SHEET
INfTIAVpATE
�DEPARTMENTDIRECfOR
�GfNATTORNEY
� &)OGEf DIflEGfOfl
� MRYOFi (OR ASSISfANT)
PERSONAL SFRVICE COHiRACTS YUST ANfWER TtiE FO�LOWPIG IX1EST10NS:
7. Hastltispe'soNfirtneverworkeAUnderacontrac[forthistleparhneM?
YES NO
2. 4iasics persaNfirtn everbeen a dty ertpbyee?
YES P�
3. Does this persaMi�m p� a�08 na twmie�N Possessed bY anY curteM Cig' enwioyee?
YES NC3
E�lein dl yas a�rowe's on separate sheet aM attaeh te g�aen sheet
The prob�em 'defective sidewalk' was caused by muttip� problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, exheme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it
yrould be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private coMractors generating public sec2or jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc6on has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allo�vLh�: i�firas��te � sic�ev�c s�etcf�a e�eriora#e, wfl� in ium, wili generate more personal injury
suiis, resulting in ihe �genc�re �largea do�ar arar�r�rNs in+�ra;�s and replacement as welta�c��'m payouts.
Cot�t� t�ssarch �er
JUL 2 �i 2001
IOUM OF TpANSACT1pN S 3v � i Rv. o� COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� Q NO
souace Ol-M-0672 A. P = , pC�{y�{yNUMBER �1-2T�54-0784-00000
INFORMA770N:(D�WN) • ° 1 ' _ . .�a_,..�___' _ �