The URL can be used to link to this page

01-632OR1G{NAL CTTY OF ST. PAUI, PRELIMINAFtY ORDER �o�CZ�NO. o�_ c3� 30 g �, File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 =n the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction and/or new construction at the following locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORIGiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ai-c�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 11 dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav ✓Blakey r/�ostrom PbSe ��' -- Co 1 eman �� `HdTTiS �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date_0 ,.,�_ �-0,�� -' - Certified Passed by Council Secretary 5 In Favor By �._ a- , tl � Against Mayor a (�-�� n� �/2?/D, �U � �- ? i � t d. � � � s' F PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision � ��e-oi �� GREEN : bNTACTPE(i50N6PHONE ��EPARfAtENiD�flECfON JenyTved[ (zss-sos� nss�r,� �car,a,-ro�u,Er NUSTBEONCOUNpLAGQ]DABYI�AT� � flOUT41G� . .�,� � UB L � � onnvt ❑euoceraa=croa � �1 i��i�-7� ��-ylf Zm� o�,Y��„��,�, fOThLiOFSHINATIIREPAGES __ ld]PALLLOCA FOflSIGNATUiiE') �uASSOp0.TE ACTION flEQII�STm I Recorutruct Sidewalk � Reconstruct Sidewaik With IMegral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 8 7 u��!' U � NO. �70438 PIITIAL/DATE 0��,� ❑cma�K !JL—(o3 ❑ FW.B MGT. SEftVICES DIR � cA�r�i R�ra, 1. t{astldspeCSONfifinevesvroAcedunderacon4actfwlhisdepaMient4 YES NO QUESTIONS: 2 Has this perswJfirtn ever been a ciy enqioy9el YES NO UNf�I 3. Does tliis persoNfirtn P�ess a sidll not nortna6Y P� bY e^Y a� �Y a�Y�? COlA7dLOa�ECtivE9 YES t� Erylafn ati yas answers on separate sheet antl attaeh ro grasn shaet l':i:GE The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by muftiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicat additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased Qedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuk. �� Rasaarch Centet Historically, the sidewatk reconstruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. "- ._ ", � This option would allow the i�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wil( generate more personat injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doliar amouMs in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRANSACTipNi S��iZ9.b4 COSTIREVENUEBUD6ETED(CIRCLEOti� YES t�w JGSWRCE Ol-H-0672 A . PfA = �O�OOO ACRVRYNUMBER CO'I-'LTI$4-O7H4-� unur-owiu,noN:cewwN� 8. AST � 3 , OR1G{NAL CTTY OF ST. PAUI, PRELIMINAFtY ORDER �o�CZ�NO. o�_ c3� 30 g �, File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 =n the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction and/or new construction at the following locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORIGiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ai-c�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 11 dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav ✓Blakey r/�ostrom PbSe ��' -- Co 1 eman �� `HdTTiS �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date_0 ,.,�_ �-0,�� -' - Certified Passed by Council Secretary 5 In Favor By �._ a- , tl � Against Mayor a (�-�� n� �/2?/D, �U � �- ? i � t d. � � � s' F PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision � ��e-oi �� GREEN : bNTACTPE(i50N6PHONE ��EPARfAtENiD�flECfON JenyTved[ (zss-sos� nss�r,� �car,a,-ro�u,Er NUSTBEONCOUNpLAGQ]DABYI�AT� � flOUT41G� . .�,� � UB L � � onnvt ❑euoceraa=croa � �1 i��i�-7� ��-ylf Zm� o�,Y��„��,�, fOThLiOFSHINATIIREPAGES __ ld]PALLLOCA FOflSIGNATUiiE') �uASSOp0.TE ACTION flEQII�STm I Recorutruct Sidewalk � Reconstruct Sidewaik With IMegral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 8 7 u��!' U � NO. �70438 PIITIAL/DATE 0��,� ❑cma�K !JL—(o3 ❑ FW.B MGT. SEftVICES DIR � cA�r�i R�ra, 1. t{astldspeCSONfifinevesvroAcedunderacon4actfwlhisdepaMient4 YES NO QUESTIONS: 2 Has this perswJfirtn ever been a ciy enqioy9el YES NO UNf�I 3. Does tliis persoNfirtn P�ess a sidll not nortna6Y P� bY e^Y a� �Y a�Y�? COlA7dLOa�ECtivE9 YES t� Erylafn ati yas answers on separate sheet antl attaeh ro grasn shaet l':i:GE The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by muftiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicat additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased Qedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuk. �� Rasaarch Centet Historically, the sidewatk reconstruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. "- ._ ", � This option would allow the i�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wil( generate more personat injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doliar amouMs in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRANSACTipNi S��iZ9.b4 COSTIREVENUEBUD6ETED(CIRCLEOti� YES t�w JGSWRCE Ol-H-0672 A . PfA = �O�OOO ACRVRYNUMBER CO'I-'LTI$4-O7H4-� unur-owiu,noN:cewwN� 8. AST � 3 , OR1G{NAL CTTY OF ST. PAUI, PRELIMINAFtY ORDER �o�CZ�NO. o�_ c3� 30 g �, File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 =n the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction and/or new construction at the following locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORIGiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ai-c�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the £irst 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MiTLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 11 dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav ✓Blakey r/�ostrom PbSe ��' -- Co 1 eman �� `HdTTiS �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date_0 ,.,�_ �-0,�� -' - Certified Passed by Council Secretary 5 In Favor By �._ a- , tl � Against Mayor a (�-�� n� �/2?/D, �U � �- ? i � t d. � � � s' F PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision � ��e-oi �� GREEN : bNTACTPE(i50N6PHONE ��EPARfAtENiD�flECfON JenyTved[ (zss-sos� nss�r,� �car,a,-ro�u,Er NUSTBEONCOUNpLAGQ]DABYI�AT� � flOUT41G� . .�,� � UB L � � onnvt ❑euoceraa=croa � �1 i��i�-7� ��-ylf Zm� o�,Y��„��,�, fOThLiOFSHINATIIREPAGES __ ld]PALLLOCA FOflSIGNATUiiE') �uASSOp0.TE ACTION flEQII�STm I Recorutruct Sidewalk � Reconstruct Sidewaik With IMegral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 8 7 u��!' U � NO. �70438 PIITIAL/DATE 0��,� ❑cma�K !JL—(o3 ❑ FW.B MGT. SEftVICES DIR � cA�r�i R�ra, 1. t{astldspeCSONfifinevesvroAcedunderacon4actfwlhisdepaMient4 YES NO QUESTIONS: 2 Has this perswJfirtn ever been a ciy enqioy9el YES NO UNf�I 3. Does tliis persoNfirtn P�ess a sidll not nortna6Y P� bY e^Y a� �Y a�Y�? COlA7dLOa�ECtivE9 YES t� Erylafn ati yas answers on separate sheet antl attaeh ro grasn shaet l':i:GE The problem °defective sidewalk" was caused by muftiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemicat additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased Qedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuk. �� Rasaarch Centet Historically, the sidewatk reconstruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. "- ._ ", � This option would allow the i�frastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wil( generate more personat injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doliar amouMs in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRANSACTipNi S��iZ9.b4 COSTIREVENUEBUD6ETED(CIRCLEOti� YES t�w JGSWRCE Ol-H-0672 A . PfA = �O�OOO ACRVRYNUMBER CO'I-'LTI$4-O7H4-� unur-owiu,noN:cewwN� 8. AST � 3 ,