The URL can be used to link to this page

01-589CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIbIIDIARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. ��—� 0 1 By -a'��I �� /-s�"`� Fi1e No_501080,501081,501083,SQ1084, 50194,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk reeonstruction and/or aew construction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S010S1 - Both sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both sides Burr Street £rom Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. S01099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton 5treet. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. S01148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - S10_06 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated acoordingly. Naw cor�sCruction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27` dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓$enanav ✓B�akey ✓B�ostrom ✓Coleman ✓ I�rris vf try !/Reiter Adopted by Council: Date .-�,.�. '�, �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � � Against � Mayor uvH� pv.trp�1� fJvlv� L. EPARTMEM)OFFICE/COUNqL Public Works - Sidewalk Division N�ACT PERSON & PHONE erry Tvedt (266-6087) MU5TBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE} "(+�N �L S�H�RI�16- � OF��U►V£�7, OTAL i OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CIIP ALL L CTION REQUESiED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 COMMITTEE CAUNCIL � �� i=oi""� IGREEN SH I� DEPAR�MENT DIRECTOR FOR ❑CRYATfORNEY _ �BIfDGEf 07HECiOA _ I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ I�� vl 01-589 ET NO. 110435 �VDATE INRIAVpATE _ ❑CfTYCOUNCIL _ ❑cmctFnK _ ❑ FM. & MGT. SEiMCES D7R. _ 01 Council Research — I IDEPT.A_ UNT _ . 1 °r"" � � PERSONALSERVICECOIITRACTSMUS7ANSWEqTflEFOLLOWING�UE5T10NS: _CIVILSEBVICECOMMISSION i. Hasthisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontractforihisdepartment? YES NO — 2. Has th�s perso�rtn ever been a city employee? YES NO — 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? _ YES NO E � Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet UNITY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH1'): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiafs, freeftfiaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wossen to a state where it wou�d be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger do4{ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we4{ as claim payouts. Courtcil R�search Genter �R l! �� . �Q� fOiAL AMOUNi OF TRANSAC710N $ v� �vvi � v.. COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE O�^M�O67P . r, pCIN1TVNUMBER C01-2T75 PINANCIAL'NFORMATION' (E%PLAIN) • � � �, , , NO � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIbIIDIARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. ��—� 0 1 By -a'��I �� /-s�"`� Fi1e No_501080,501081,501083,SQ1084, 50194,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk reeonstruction and/or aew construction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S010S1 - Both sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both sides Burr Street £rom Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. S01099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton 5treet. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. S01148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - S10_06 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated acoordingly. Naw cor�sCruction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27` dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓$enanav ✓B�akey ✓B�ostrom ✓Coleman ✓ I�rris vf try !/Reiter Adopted by Council: Date .-�,.�. '�, �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � � Against � Mayor uvH� pv.trp�1� fJvlv� L. EPARTMEM)OFFICE/COUNqL Public Works - Sidewalk Division N�ACT PERSON & PHONE erry Tvedt (266-6087) MU5TBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE} "(+�N �L S�H�RI�16- � OF��U►V£�7, OTAL i OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CIIP ALL L CTION REQUESiED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 COMMITTEE CAUNCIL � �� i=oi""� IGREEN SH I� DEPAR�MENT DIRECTOR FOR ❑CRYATfORNEY _ �BIfDGEf 07HECiOA _ I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ I�� vl 01-589 ET NO. 110435 �VDATE INRIAVpATE _ ❑CfTYCOUNCIL _ ❑cmctFnK _ ❑ FM. & MGT. SEiMCES D7R. _ 01 Council Research — I IDEPT.A_ UNT _ . 1 °r"" � � PERSONALSERVICECOIITRACTSMUS7ANSWEqTflEFOLLOWING�UE5T10NS: _CIVILSEBVICECOMMISSION i. Hasthisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontractforihisdepartment? YES NO — 2. Has th�s perso�rtn ever been a city employee? YES NO — 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? _ YES NO E � Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet UNITY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH1'): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiafs, freeftfiaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wossen to a state where it wou�d be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger do4{ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we4{ as claim payouts. Courtcil R�search Genter �R l! �� . �Q� fOiAL AMOUNi OF TRANSAC710N $ v� �vvi � v.. COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE O�^M�O67P . r, pCIN1TVNUMBER C01-2T75 PINANCIAL'NFORMATION' (E%PLAIN) • � � �, , , NO � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIbIIDIARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. ��—� 0 1 By -a'��I �� /-s�"`� Fi1e No_501080,501081,501083,SQ1084, 50194,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk reeonstruction and/or aew construction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S010S1 - Both sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both sides Burr Street £rom Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. S01099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton 5treet. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. S01148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - S10_06 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated acoordingly. Naw cor�sCruction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$ o£ actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27` dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓$enanav ✓B�akey ✓B�ostrom ✓Coleman ✓ I�rris vf try !/Reiter Adopted by Council: Date .-�,.�. '�, �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � � Against � Mayor uvH� pv.trp�1� fJvlv� L. EPARTMEM)OFFICE/COUNqL Public Works - Sidewalk Division N�ACT PERSON & PHONE erry Tvedt (266-6087) MU5TBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE} "(+�N �L S�H�RI�16- � OF��U►V£�7, OTAL i OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CIIP ALL L CTION REQUESiED Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 COMMITTEE CAUNCIL � �� i=oi""� IGREEN SH I� DEPAR�MENT DIRECTOR FOR ❑CRYATfORNEY _ �BIfDGEf 07HECiOA _ I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ I�� vl 01-589 ET NO. 110435 �VDATE INRIAVpATE _ ❑CfTYCOUNCIL _ ❑cmctFnK _ ❑ FM. & MGT. SEiMCES D7R. _ 01 Council Research — I IDEPT.A_ UNT _ . 1 °r"" � � PERSONALSERVICECOIITRACTSMUS7ANSWEqTflEFOLLOWING�UE5T10NS: _CIVILSEBVICECOMMISSION i. Hasthisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontractforihisdepartment? YES NO — 2. Has th�s perso�rtn ever been a city employee? YES NO — 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? _ YES NO E � Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet UNITY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WH1'): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiafs, freeftfiaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wossen to a state where it wou�d be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger do4{ar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we4{ as claim payouts. Courtcil R�search Genter �R l! �� . �Q� fOiAL AMOUNi OF TRANSAC710N $ v� �vvi � v.. COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE O�^M�O67P . r, pCIN1TVNUMBER C01-2T75 PINANCIAL'NFORMATION' (E%PLAIN) • � � �, , , NO �