Loading...
01-497CITY OF ST. PAiSI, 0 R l G I NA L COUNC�� jNO.j i � r� �� pREL'�T�•rTriauy ORDER � By U v�(L v. / V "'—� File No. _501019, 501020, 501028,501046, 501058, 501061-501065 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501019 - Both sides Amherst Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 501020 - Both sides Amherst Street from Princeton Avenue to Goodrich Avenue & Both sides Goodrich Avenue from South Wheeler Street to Amherst Street. 501028 - Both sides Ford Parkway from Davern Street to Macalester Street. S01046 - Both sides North Oxford Street from Portland Avenue to Ashland Avenue. 501058 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 5�1061 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Hartford Avenue to Niles Avenue. 501062 - East side North Lexington Parkway from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501063 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Niles Avenue to Randolph Avenue. 501064 - Both sides North Ox£ord Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue £rom North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501065 - East side Keston Street from Commonwealth Avenue to Carter Avenue at 1280 & 1286 Keston Street Only. o�-�a� *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.�6 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot, The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200; Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6` dav of June . 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M, in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays Benanav �lakey t/'Bostrom �oleman ✓Harris i�antry �i ter _(_In Favor Z7 Against Adopted by Council: Date a"bdl t Certified Passed by Council Se etary �or fi � � s' � � r- �. �" Works - Sidewalk Division oFS�munxv�v�s _ Sidewalk m Wards 1, 2, 3& 4 08JECiiVE7 "s o; "' GREEN SHEE INRIAU I UMBERFOX uCRYATfORNEY ROIRRlG �BIAGEfqRECTOit � �tnvon (on �sstsrnrrp ��„�, ❑,.�� 1��� �����._�{�� S�N.� � T � Jltyo. °i-�y7 102775 '�` INRIAWATE _ ❑dTV�IMCJL _ ❑C(fYCI.EAK _ ❑ Ft16 MCa'f. SEiMCES OIR _ Q Council Research ,-��. sFnsoNn�. s�►+��ce coNran�rs rusT nNSx�a n� Fouowwc nuESnoNS: S. l�slhispersoNfrmeverNOilcedunderawnnaQfortlustlepartrnent? YES !� 2 F{aSUtispe�sq�mfererbeeneatym�iq�ee? YES NO 3. Dces tlms PBrsa�i�m G�ss a sldY not nortnaily Go�essed by anycurreM citY emPbYee? YES NO �£�Wn NI y�s w+xa�s mf aepuala alieN a�W atlMhto gresn �tiset in���n�xwrnw�.eK�Sn1C.c�r1VMIUN1I1lwM0. WMFT. WYEN. WFiERE. WH1�. ._-- / The problem 'defective sidewaik" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor su6grade materiais, freelthaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemica[ additives, e�dreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected anrwatl�r. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where ft would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. . The commuruty wiN benefi! irorte ih� projecY betxuse ft wili provide safe detect free sidewalks for its cftisens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cordractors generating pubi'ic sector jobs as a resuk. Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstruction has createsi negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessrffe�ets, despite the fact thffi up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiai issue. This option wou(d aliow ihe infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal�njury suits, resutting in the eupendfture ot latger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. 11 .«" ` �/�� Q 7 �0� s CA1 � rt�a+eu.twn: (opwM CITY OF ST. PAiSI, 0 R l G I NA L COUNC�� jNO.j i � r� �� pREL'�T�•rTriauy ORDER � By U v�(L v. / V "'—� File No. _501019, 501020, 501028,501046, 501058, 501061-501065 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501019 - Both sides Amherst Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 501020 - Both sides Amherst Street from Princeton Avenue to Goodrich Avenue & Both sides Goodrich Avenue from South Wheeler Street to Amherst Street. 501028 - Both sides Ford Parkway from Davern Street to Macalester Street. S01046 - Both sides North Oxford Street from Portland Avenue to Ashland Avenue. 501058 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 5�1061 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Hartford Avenue to Niles Avenue. 501062 - East side North Lexington Parkway from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501063 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Niles Avenue to Randolph Avenue. 501064 - Both sides North Ox£ord Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue £rom North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501065 - East side Keston Street from Commonwealth Avenue to Carter Avenue at 1280 & 1286 Keston Street Only. o�-�a� *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.�6 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot, The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200; Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6` dav of June . 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M, in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays Benanav �lakey t/'Bostrom �oleman ✓Harris i�antry �i ter _(_In Favor Z7 Against Adopted by Council: Date a"bdl t Certified Passed by Council Se etary �or fi � � s' � � r- �. �" Works - Sidewalk Division oFS�munxv�v�s _ Sidewalk m Wards 1, 2, 3& 4 08JECiiVE7 "s o; "' GREEN SHEE INRIAU I UMBERFOX uCRYATfORNEY ROIRRlG �BIAGEfqRECTOit � �tnvon (on �sstsrnrrp ��„�, ❑,.�� 1��� �����._�{�� S�N.� � T � Jltyo. °i-�y7 102775 '�` INRIAWATE _ ❑dTV�IMCJL _ ❑C(fYCI.EAK _ ❑ Ft16 MCa'f. SEiMCES OIR _ Q Council Research ,-��. sFnsoNn�. s�►+��ce coNran�rs rusT nNSx�a n� Fouowwc nuESnoNS: S. l�slhispersoNfrmeverNOilcedunderawnnaQfortlustlepartrnent? YES !� 2 F{aSUtispe�sq�mfererbeeneatym�iq�ee? YES NO 3. Dces tlms PBrsa�i�m G�ss a sldY not nortnaily Go�essed by anycurreM citY emPbYee? YES NO �£�Wn NI y�s w+xa�s mf aepuala alieN a�W atlMhto gresn �tiset in���n�xwrnw�.eK�Sn1C.c�r1VMIUN1I1lwM0. WMFT. WYEN. WFiERE. WH1�. ._-- / The problem 'defective sidewaik" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor su6grade materiais, freelthaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemica[ additives, e�dreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected anrwatl�r. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where ft would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. . The commuruty wiN benefi! irorte ih� projecY betxuse ft wili provide safe detect free sidewalks for its cftisens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cordractors generating pubi'ic sector jobs as a resuk. Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstruction has createsi negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessrffe�ets, despite the fact thffi up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiai issue. This option wou(d aliow ihe infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal�njury suits, resutting in the eupendfture ot latger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. 11 .«" ` �/�� Q 7 �0� s CA1 � rt�a+eu.twn: (opwM CITY OF ST. PAiSI, 0 R l G I NA L COUNC�� jNO.j i � r� �� pREL'�T�•rTriauy ORDER � By U v�(L v. / V "'—� File No. _501019, 501020, 501028,501046, 501058, 501061-501065 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501019 - Both sides Amherst Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 501020 - Both sides Amherst Street from Princeton Avenue to Goodrich Avenue & Both sides Goodrich Avenue from South Wheeler Street to Amherst Street. 501028 - Both sides Ford Parkway from Davern Street to Macalester Street. S01046 - Both sides North Oxford Street from Portland Avenue to Ashland Avenue. 501058 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Princeton Avenue. 5�1061 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Hartford Avenue to Niles Avenue. 501062 - East side North Lexington Parkway from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501063 - Both sides South Saratoga Street from Niles Avenue to Randolph Avenue. 501064 - Both sides North Ox£ord Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue & North side Summit Avenue £rom North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 501065 - East side Keston Street from Commonwealth Avenue to Carter Avenue at 1280 & 1286 Keston Street Only. o�-�a� *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.�6 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot, The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200; Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6` dav of June . 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M, in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays Benanav �lakey t/'Bostrom �oleman ✓Harris i�antry �i ter _(_In Favor Z7 Against Adopted by Council: Date a"bdl t Certified Passed by Council Se etary �or fi � � s' � � r- �. �" Works - Sidewalk Division oFS�munxv�v�s _ Sidewalk m Wards 1, 2, 3& 4 08JECiiVE7 "s o; "' GREEN SHEE INRIAU I UMBERFOX uCRYATfORNEY ROIRRlG �BIAGEfqRECTOit � �tnvon (on �sstsrnrrp ��„�, ❑,.�� 1��� �����._�{�� S�N.� � T � Jltyo. °i-�y7 102775 '�` INRIAWATE _ ❑dTV�IMCJL _ ❑C(fYCI.EAK _ ❑ Ft16 MCa'f. SEiMCES OIR _ Q Council Research ,-��. sFnsoNn�. s�►+��ce coNran�rs rusT nNSx�a n� Fouowwc nuESnoNS: S. l�slhispersoNfrmeverNOilcedunderawnnaQfortlustlepartrnent? YES !� 2 F{aSUtispe�sq�mfererbeeneatym�iq�ee? YES NO 3. Dces tlms PBrsa�i�m G�ss a sldY not nortnaily Go�essed by anycurreM citY emPbYee? YES NO �£�Wn NI y�s w+xa�s mf aepuala alieN a�W atlMhto gresn �tiset in���n�xwrnw�.eK�Sn1C.c�r1VMIUN1I1lwM0. WMFT. WYEN. WFiERE. WH1�. ._-- / The problem 'defective sidewaik" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor su6grade materiais, freelthaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemica[ additives, e�dreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corcected anrwatl�r. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where ft would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possible litigations. . The commuruty wiN benefi! irorte ih� projecY betxuse ft wili provide safe detect free sidewalks for its cftisens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private cordractors generating pubi'ic sector jobs as a resuk. Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstruction has createsi negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessrffe�ets, despite the fact thffi up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiai issue. This option wou(d aliow ihe infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal�njury suits, resutting in the eupendfture ot latger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. 11 .«" ` �/�� Q 7 �0� s CA1 � rt�a+eu.twn: (opwM