The URL can be used to link to this page

01-496ORIGINAL CITY OF 3T. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,- y9 � as COUNCIL FILE . By File o. 501022 - S 1024, 501027 SQ1037, 501�54, 5�106� Voting Ward, 2,3,4 In the Matter of sidevral}c reconstruction aad/or new construction at the follooring locatians: 501022 - East side Broadway Street from East Kellogg Boulevard to Prince Street. 501023 - East Side South Cleveland Avenue from Ramlow Place to Magoffin Avenue. 501024 - Both sides North Dunlap Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue. S01027 - East side South Fairview Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue. S01037 - Both sides South Hamline Avenue from Stan£ord Avenue to St. Clair Avenue & South side St. C1air Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to Cecilia P1ace. 501059 - Both sides North Wilder Street from Marshall Avenue to Iglehart Avenue. 501060 - West side Youngman Avenue from Madison Street to Rankin Street. o � -�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4,50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200� Public Improvement Aid. � c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman r/�-tarri s r/L�ntry ��eiter ( In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_��0` / \ Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary or �] Works - Sidewalk Di�ision �y /3/Ol n�-�q� GREEN SHEET �o. �ozna INRIAUDATE �OEPARiMFNTpREC'fOR ❑CIiVCIX1Ndl �^GTVAI'fOiWEV ❑CIfYCLEFIC 1J �'ET p�CT� ❑ flN, d MGT. SERVICES D10. f��uvoa (ort ass�sru�+rl Q Couaal Research OFSIGNATIREPAG6 __ Sidewalk Sidewalk ai Wards 2, 3& 4 Fon s�+umatq t-.�i?�F'-'_:i:w� �^^�'�-P.'. I 'T .� •: �E1�pNA1. SEFiY1C�CONiRACT�IAUST ANSVrEtt THE WLl,OWMG QuESTtoNS: 1. F YES MO 2. Has Cus ParsoNfirtn everbeen a ciry employee? YES NO 3. DoasBUSPersaJfinnv�sasldMnot�omWMR�s�seGbY�Y��remPlv�ee? YEu MO E�W� aH 1ws axrr�rs on saparaL ahset uW atlaeh to gran sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik' was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw �ycles, service life iimits, chemical add'dives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatiy. Left uncortected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where 1t would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible iitigations. The community will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewalk cantracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a resuft. Historicaily, the sidewalk reco�structio� has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessmeMS. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haN the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woutd affow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which m tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doltar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cotar�� Resea{ch Cenfer �AY � 7 2001 /UIWNTOFTpANSACTiON ja�0{b�06 � COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEOti� ucsoURCE �1-M-O6]Z . _ , pC��y�eER _ COl-ZT754-O7E AL INFORMA770N: (E%PUUN) 6 A ST a 3 ��Q . . 0 ORIGINAL CITY OF 3T. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,- y9 � as COUNCIL FILE . By File o. 501022 - S 1024, 501027 SQ1037, 501�54, 5�106� Voting Ward, 2,3,4 In the Matter of sidevral}c reconstruction aad/or new construction at the follooring locatians: 501022 - East side Broadway Street from East Kellogg Boulevard to Prince Street. 501023 - East Side South Cleveland Avenue from Ramlow Place to Magoffin Avenue. 501024 - Both sides North Dunlap Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue. S01027 - East side South Fairview Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue. S01037 - Both sides South Hamline Avenue from Stan£ord Avenue to St. Clair Avenue & South side St. C1air Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to Cecilia P1ace. 501059 - Both sides North Wilder Street from Marshall Avenue to Iglehart Avenue. 501060 - West side Youngman Avenue from Madison Street to Rankin Street. o � -�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4,50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200� Public Improvement Aid. � c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman r/�-tarri s r/L�ntry ��eiter ( In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_��0` / \ Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary or �] Works - Sidewalk Di�ision �y /3/Ol n�-�q� GREEN SHEET �o. �ozna INRIAUDATE �OEPARiMFNTpREC'fOR ❑CIiVCIX1Ndl �^GTVAI'fOiWEV ❑CIfYCLEFIC 1J �'ET p�CT� ❑ flN, d MGT. SERVICES D10. f��uvoa (ort ass�sru�+rl Q Couaal Research OFSIGNATIREPAG6 __ Sidewalk Sidewalk ai Wards 2, 3& 4 Fon s�+umatq t-.�i?�F'-'_:i:w� �^^�'�-P.'. I 'T .� •: �E1�pNA1. SEFiY1C�CONiRACT�IAUST ANSVrEtt THE WLl,OWMG QuESTtoNS: 1. F YES MO 2. Has Cus ParsoNfirtn everbeen a ciry employee? YES NO 3. DoasBUSPersaJfinnv�sasldMnot�omWMR�s�seGbY�Y��remPlv�ee? YEu MO E�W� aH 1ws axrr�rs on saparaL ahset uW atlaeh to gran sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik' was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw �ycles, service life iimits, chemical add'dives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatiy. Left uncortected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where 1t would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible iitigations. The community will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewalk cantracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a resuft. Historicaily, the sidewalk reco�structio� has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessmeMS. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haN the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woutd affow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which m tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doltar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cotar�� Resea{ch Cenfer �AY � 7 2001 /UIWNTOFTpANSACTiON ja�0{b�06 � COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEOti� ucsoURCE �1-M-O6]Z . _ , pC��y�eER _ COl-ZT754-O7E AL INFORMA770N: (E%PUUN) 6 A ST a 3 ��Q . . 0 ORIGINAL CITY OF 3T. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,- y9 � as COUNCIL FILE . By File o. 501022 - S 1024, 501027 SQ1037, 501�54, 5�106� Voting Ward, 2,3,4 In the Matter of sidevral}c reconstruction aad/or new construction at the follooring locatians: 501022 - East side Broadway Street from East Kellogg Boulevard to Prince Street. 501023 - East Side South Cleveland Avenue from Ramlow Place to Magoffin Avenue. 501024 - Both sides North Dunlap Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue. S01027 - East side South Fairview Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue. S01037 - Both sides South Hamline Avenue from Stan£ord Avenue to St. Clair Avenue & South side St. C1air Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to Cecilia P1ace. 501059 - Both sides North Wilder Street from Marshall Avenue to Iglehart Avenue. 501060 - West side Youngman Avenue from Madison Street to Rankin Street. o � -�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4,50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 200� Public Improvement Aid. � c3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th dav of June , 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �oleman r/�-tarri s r/L�ntry ��eiter ( In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date_��0` / \ Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary or �] Works - Sidewalk Di�ision �y /3/Ol n�-�q� GREEN SHEET �o. �ozna INRIAUDATE �OEPARiMFNTpREC'fOR ❑CIiVCIX1Ndl �^GTVAI'fOiWEV ❑CIfYCLEFIC 1J �'ET p�CT� ❑ flN, d MGT. SERVICES D10. f��uvoa (ort ass�sru�+rl Q Couaal Research OFSIGNATIREPAG6 __ Sidewalk Sidewalk ai Wards 2, 3& 4 Fon s�+umatq t-.�i?�F'-'_:i:w� �^^�'�-P.'. I 'T .� •: �E1�pNA1. SEFiY1C�CONiRACT�IAUST ANSVrEtt THE WLl,OWMG QuESTtoNS: 1. F YES MO 2. Has Cus ParsoNfirtn everbeen a ciry employee? YES NO 3. DoasBUSPersaJfinnv�sasldMnot�omWMR�s�seGbY�Y��remPlv�ee? YEu MO E�W� aH 1ws axrr�rs on saparaL ahset uW atlaeh to gran sheet The probiem "defective sidewaik' was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw �ycles, service life iimits, chemical add'dives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuatiy. Left uncortected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where 1t would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible iitigations. The community will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewalk cantracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a resuft. Historicaily, the sidewalk reco�structio� has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessmeMS. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haN the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woutd affow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which m tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resutting in the expenditure of larger doltar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cotar�� Resea{ch Cenfer �AY � 7 2001 /UIWNTOFTpANSACTiON ja�0{b�06 � COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEOti� ucsoURCE �1-M-O6]Z . _ , pC��y�eER _ COl-ZT754-O7E AL INFORMA770N: (E%PUUN) 6 A ST a 3 ��Q . . 0