Loading...
01-211CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ' ��til!`�� ��� "� � �..1 � i i i� COUN L �ILE ��� By Fil o_ SO1001 Votang Ward_ 2,3,5 C�J In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the followiag locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. � MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓Blakey ✓'�p strom ✓C`oleman �ur�� Harri s ✓�antry � ter Adopted by Council : Date ....� 1-�Od� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � 1'!�?A�� � � Against `_ �� Mayor 3/�/0� Works - Sidewalk Division '-UV I ° '�I ��� � (�( U 1 O � -a-\\ DAlE INITIATED ,-,�-o, GREEN SHEET No. io2��o ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� �cur n�� Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8 5 � `/f [.1 NUINBEpFOR IJCT'ATTORNEY "�VI " ORDEq I�BUOGETOIREGTOR hZ�� I � MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) FOH SIGNANR� wmawn� ❑cmcouna� ❑ CITY GLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEHVICES DIR _ Qj Council Research _ . ��� PERSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: GIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. H251hiSpersoNfifineVefWOlkedUndefHCOnt2C[FWihiSdZp2rOmEnl? VES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO F � Explain all yes answers on xparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are clone by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment���ity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. r �h � cpU11G�0 Q'�5t�2 .� . � �� �� � ��Q� , IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate m9re personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as wefl olaim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 1 Z t y94. }O COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE D��M'�6]� A• PtA 00 ° Z�� pCINfTVNUMBEH C00-2T753-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E%PWIN) B� AST ° � C Ct6 �� ° 5����0 CS \ -2- �\ SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pieasant Ave. to Rogers St. at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � UO ( IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. o �-a�� SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 3 ✓V��/f/! PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and ✓Vl W' cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and �l�I cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. o�-a�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVI1��NDATIONS Ward 5 50100� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Arundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 501001 heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 5010oi 5aooi heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale St. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ' ��til!`�� ��� "� � �..1 � i i i� COUN L �ILE ��� By Fil o_ SO1001 Votang Ward_ 2,3,5 C�J In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the followiag locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. � MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓Blakey ✓'�p strom ✓C`oleman �ur�� Harri s ✓�antry � ter Adopted by Council : Date ....� 1-�Od� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � 1'!�?A�� � � Against `_ �� Mayor 3/�/0� Works - Sidewalk Division '-UV I ° '�I ��� � (�( U 1 O � -a-\\ DAlE INITIATED ,-,�-o, GREEN SHEET No. io2��o ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� �cur n�� Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8 5 � `/f [.1 NUINBEpFOR IJCT'ATTORNEY "�VI " ORDEq I�BUOGETOIREGTOR hZ�� I � MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) FOH SIGNANR� wmawn� ❑cmcouna� ❑ CITY GLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEHVICES DIR _ Qj Council Research _ . ��� PERSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: GIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. H251hiSpersoNfifineVefWOlkedUndefHCOnt2C[FWihiSdZp2rOmEnl? VES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO F � Explain all yes answers on xparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are clone by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment���ity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. r �h � cpU11G�0 Q'�5t�2 .� . � �� �� � ��Q� , IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate m9re personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as wefl olaim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 1 Z t y94. }O COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE D��M'�6]� A• PtA 00 ° Z�� pCINfTVNUMBEH C00-2T753-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E%PWIN) B� AST ° � C Ct6 �� ° 5����0 CS \ -2- �\ SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pieasant Ave. to Rogers St. at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � UO ( IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. o �-a�� SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 3 ✓V��/f/! PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and ✓Vl W' cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and �l�I cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. o�-a�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVI1��NDATIONS Ward 5 50100� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Arundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 501001 heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 5010oi 5aooi heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale St. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ' ��til!`�� ��� "� � �..1 � i i i� COUN L �ILE ��� By Fil o_ SO1001 Votang Ward_ 2,3,5 C�J In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the followiag locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. � MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓Blakey ✓'�p strom ✓C`oleman �ur�� Harri s ✓�antry � ter Adopted by Council : Date ....� 1-�Od� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � 1'!�?A�� � � Against `_ �� Mayor 3/�/0� Works - Sidewalk Division '-UV I ° '�I ��� � (�( U 1 O � -a-\\ DAlE INITIATED ,-,�-o, GREEN SHEET No. io2��o ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� �cur n�� Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3 8 5 � `/f [.1 NUINBEpFOR IJCT'ATTORNEY "�VI " ORDEq I�BUOGETOIREGTOR hZ�� I � MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) FOH SIGNANR� wmawn� ❑cmcouna� ❑ CITY GLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SEHVICES DIR _ Qj Council Research _ . ��� PERSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: GIVILSERVICECOMMISSION 7. H251hiSpersoNfifineVefWOlkedUndefHCOnt2C[FWihiSdZp2rOmEnl? VES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO F � Explain all yes answers on xparate sheet and attaeh to green sheet The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are clone by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment���ity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. r �h � cpU11G�0 Q'�5t�2 .� . � �� �� � ��Q� , IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate m9re personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as wefl olaim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 1 Z t y94. }O COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO JGSOURCE D��M'�6]� A• PtA 00 ° Z�� pCINfTVNUMBEH C00-2T753-0784-00000 ALINFORMAiION:(E%PWIN) B� AST ° � C Ct6 �� ° 5����0 CS \ -2- �\ SiJNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATION Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pieasant Ave. to Rogers St. at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � UO ( IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners_ EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. o �-a�� SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOD��NDATIONS Ward 3 ✓V��/f/! PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and ✓Vl W' cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and �l�I cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. o�-a�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOlVI1��NDATIONS Ward 5 50100� PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Arundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 501001 heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave. to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, 5010oi 5aooi heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale St. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St. to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels.