Loading...
01-209CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIlKINARY ORDER �`�IGf��L COUNCIL FILE NO. O�-a4 By a,V F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new constructioa at the following locations: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �3 tfiat the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav //�lakey � strom a �leman �C� Harris ✓�a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � ��lV�� Adopted by Council: Date !�\�7�C70� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — - /, �1%i%/i � % � i//�/ � r' VD/H� I �NIIlIr4V Works - Sidewalk Divisirn BE ON CWNCII AGENDA f OFSIGNANRE PAGES � �� �tSt� Z U1"U� o�-aQ� ATE INtT1ATE0 102741 -ZS-oo GREEN SHEET No. iNmnwa'r� �DEPARTMEDf�DIRECTOfl ❑CffYCOUNCIL � NU�RffiGFRWfl ❑CT'ATfORNEY ❑CRyC�EqK q��ar' � BUD(iET DIP.ECTOR � FIN. & MGL SERVICES DIR. DBDER �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) QCouncflReseazch FORSIGNAi11R� � �ASSOCIAIE Recorrstruct E� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached lisl) DEPT. °"`=�' � PERSONALSERVICECONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUE5T10NS: CIVILSEfiVICEfAMMISSION 1. HasthispersoNfirtneverwotkedunderacontrac[forUiisdepartr�ent?� YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever baen a ciry employee? YES NO CAUNCILO�ECi1VE7 3. Does this person/firtn possess a sidll no[ nortnaly possessed by any curteM ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT,NMEN, WHERE, WH`n: The prob{em "defective sidewa{k" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/ihaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuaAy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal�s and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. DISADVAfv'�AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assess�rr�e� subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. q�:�Y�' �' � F?p � �, �,�Q1 � ��.Fa t� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury ^ suits, resutting in the expend'+ture of targer dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) NO ���SOUHCE 77^�'voo7 M. r�r� 77 ° v�v��w pCINfTYNUMBER INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) m f C. Ct6 99 � So,00O c� \—a-E'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATION waza i I►i�' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBX AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans St. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. b \ � SUMD�IARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Monueal Ave. Only. 5 �' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDIITONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�' IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with uneven and setded panels. D � —�--0 `` SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS •��r��.c' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. NORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�i IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled paneis. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbeft Pl. to Dorothea Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... a �-a-�q SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 4 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 L,afond Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTII3G CONDITIONS This walk is old tile with broken tile. STJMMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 5 o � - ��`\ PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. C01°TAGE AVE. from Galuer St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. � lA/lN 1 IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKUBIN ST. from Front Ave. to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �I IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is first time construction. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK RIDGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�, IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIlKINARY ORDER �`�IGf��L COUNCIL FILE NO. O�-a4 By a,V F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new constructioa at the following locations: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �3 tfiat the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav //�lakey � strom a �leman �C� Harris ✓�a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � ��lV�� Adopted by Council: Date !�\�7�C70� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — - /, �1%i%/i � % � i//�/ � r' VD/H� I �NIIlIr4V Works - Sidewalk Divisirn BE ON CWNCII AGENDA f OFSIGNANRE PAGES � �� �tSt� Z U1"U� o�-aQ� ATE INtT1ATE0 102741 -ZS-oo GREEN SHEET No. iNmnwa'r� �DEPARTMEDf�DIRECTOfl ❑CffYCOUNCIL � NU�RffiGFRWfl ❑CT'ATfORNEY ❑CRyC�EqK q��ar' � BUD(iET DIP.ECTOR � FIN. & MGL SERVICES DIR. DBDER �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) QCouncflReseazch FORSIGNAi11R� � �ASSOCIAIE Recorrstruct E� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached lisl) DEPT. °"`=�' � PERSONALSERVICECONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUE5T10NS: CIVILSEfiVICEfAMMISSION 1. HasthispersoNfirtneverwotkedunderacontrac[forUiisdepartr�ent?� YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever baen a ciry employee? YES NO CAUNCILO�ECi1VE7 3. Does this person/firtn possess a sidll no[ nortnaly possessed by any curteM ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT,NMEN, WHERE, WH`n: The prob{em "defective sidewa{k" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/ihaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuaAy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal�s and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. DISADVAfv'�AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assess�rr�e� subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. q�:�Y�' �' � F?p � �, �,�Q1 � ��.Fa t� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury ^ suits, resutting in the expend'+ture of targer dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) NO ���SOUHCE 77^�'voo7 M. r�r� 77 ° v�v��w pCINfTYNUMBER INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) m f C. Ct6 99 � So,00O c� \—a-E'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATION waza i I►i�' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBX AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans St. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. b \ � SUMD�IARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Monueal Ave. Only. 5 �' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDIITONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�' IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with uneven and setded panels. D � —�--0 `` SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS •��r��.c' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. NORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�i IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled paneis. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbeft Pl. to Dorothea Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... a �-a-�q SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 4 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 L,afond Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTII3G CONDITIONS This walk is old tile with broken tile. STJMMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 5 o � - ��`\ PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. C01°TAGE AVE. from Galuer St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. � lA/lN 1 IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKUBIN ST. from Front Ave. to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �I IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is first time construction. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK RIDGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�, IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIlKINARY ORDER �`�IGf��L COUNCIL FILE NO. O�-a4 By a,V F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward 1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new constructioa at the following locations: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �3 tfiat the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav //�lakey � strom a �leman �C� Harris ✓�a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � ��lV�� Adopted by Council: Date !�\�7�C70� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — - /, �1%i%/i � % � i//�/ � r' VD/H� I �NIIlIr4V Works - Sidewalk Divisirn BE ON CWNCII AGENDA f OFSIGNANRE PAGES � �� �tSt� Z U1"U� o�-aQ� ATE INtT1ATE0 102741 -ZS-oo GREEN SHEET No. iNmnwa'r� �DEPARTMEDf�DIRECTOfl ❑CffYCOUNCIL � NU�RffiGFRWfl ❑CT'ATfORNEY ❑CRyC�EqK q��ar' � BUD(iET DIP.ECTOR � FIN. & MGL SERVICES DIR. DBDER �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) QCouncflReseazch FORSIGNAi11R� � �ASSOCIAIE Recorrstruct E� Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached lisl) DEPT. °"`=�' � PERSONALSERVICECONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWINGQUE5T10NS: CIVILSEfiVICEfAMMISSION 1. HasthispersoNfirtneverwotkedunderacontrac[forUiisdepartr�ent?� YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever baen a ciry employee? YES NO CAUNCILO�ECi1VE7 3. Does this person/firtn possess a sidll no[ nortnaly possessed by any curteM ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT,NMEN, WHERE, WH`n: The prob{em "defective sidewa{k" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/ihaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuaAy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal�s and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. DISADVAfv'�AGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assess�rr�e� subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. q�:�Y�' �' � F?p � �, �,�Q1 � ��.Fa t� DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury ^ suits, resutting in the expend'+ture of targer dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) NO ���SOUHCE 77^�'voo7 M. r�r� 77 ° v�v��w pCINfTYNUMBER INFORMATION: (IXPLAIN) m f C. Ct6 99 � So,00O c� \—a-E'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATION waza i I►i�' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SELBX AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans St. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. b \ � SUMD�IARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Monueal Ave. Only. 5 �' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDIITONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. ROBERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�' IlVITIATING ACTION: This order was inivated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with uneven and setded panels. D � —�--0 `` SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS •��r��.c' PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. NORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�i IATITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with scaled paneis. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbeft Pl. to Dorothea Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... a �-a-�q SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 4 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 L,afond Ave. Only. 5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner. EXISTII3G CONDITIONS This walk is old tile with broken tile. STJMMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Wazd 5 o � - ��`\ PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. C01°TAGE AVE. from Galuer St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. � lA/lN 1 IDiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKUBIN ST. from Front Ave. to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �I IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is first time construction. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK RIDGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�, IrTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels.