Loading...
00-545C=TY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ��iGii�AL COUNCIL FILE N0. O� SyS By �D����- File o._S00127 - 500133 Voting Ward 5,6 & 7 3S In the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, reconstructioa of asphalt sidevoalk aad/or new construction at the following locations: 500127 - South Side West Iowa Avenue from North Chatsworth Street to North Oxford Street. 500128 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. 500129 - Both Sides East Maryland Avenue from Earl Street to Frank Street & West Side Frank Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 500130 - Both Sides Conway Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 500131 - Both Sides East Minnehaha Avenue from North Ruth Street to North Winthrop Street. 500132 - Both Sides East Third Street from North Ruth Street to Pedersen Street. 500133 - East Side Waukon Avenue from Pedersen Street to Ross Avenue. O�/-s�s CRI�i�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oId sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wi&e walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, a� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav (�bse.-� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman ,�iarris ,�antry vR' iter Adopted by Council: Date � a Certified Passed by Council Secretary 6 In Favor By '�1 \�� � . �� _-� _ �Against ���/C�G%K�Gfi/ � (�bsev�� �f/�(/� Mayor r Works - Sidewalk Division Tvedt E ON CC GCt# in Wards 5, 6& 7 � WHAT, WHEN, la'I f'�G � J/�U/FIU Od s�� GREEN SHEET Na �o2�s2 wmnwn� ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑�'�AK ❑ FlN. & MGL S6iNCES �IR � Council Research � oePnrmaErir a�croa FOH ❑CfiYAITORNEY O &1DGEf OIRECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTHNT) PERSONAL SERYICE CONiAACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. HasMispersoNfirtneverworkedurideraconVac[forthisdepartmrit? YES NO 2 Has Mis persoNfirtn ever 6een a dty empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Nis personfirtn possess a sla"II rrot nortna0y possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would woreen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for watk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cour� Research Center MAY 3 0 2Q�0 GVIL SFRNCE COMAVSSION WHICFi COUNqL OBJECTIVE? IOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 31.9tl6,! SOURCE 00-M-0671 A, PIA 00 = wFOanunon: �owwN) B , AST = c. cis oo = 5o,aoo COST1FiEVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIqCLE ON� YES No ACRVITY NUM1iBER C'Da2T7$3-07$�-� ��� C=TY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ��iGii�AL COUNCIL FILE N0. O� SyS By �D����- File o._S00127 - 500133 Voting Ward 5,6 & 7 3S In the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, reconstructioa of asphalt sidevoalk aad/or new construction at the following locations: 500127 - South Side West Iowa Avenue from North Chatsworth Street to North Oxford Street. 500128 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. 500129 - Both Sides East Maryland Avenue from Earl Street to Frank Street & West Side Frank Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 500130 - Both Sides Conway Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 500131 - Both Sides East Minnehaha Avenue from North Ruth Street to North Winthrop Street. 500132 - Both Sides East Third Street from North Ruth Street to Pedersen Street. 500133 - East Side Waukon Avenue from Pedersen Street to Ross Avenue. O�/-s�s CRI�i�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oId sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wi&e walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, a� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav (�bse.-� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman ,�iarris ,�antry vR' iter Adopted by Council: Date � a Certified Passed by Council Secretary 6 In Favor By '�1 \�� � . �� _-� _ �Against ���/C�G%K�Gfi/ � (�bsev�� �f/�(/� Mayor r Works - Sidewalk Division Tvedt E ON CC GCt# in Wards 5, 6& 7 � WHAT, WHEN, la'I f'�G � J/�U/FIU Od s�� GREEN SHEET Na �o2�s2 wmnwn� ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑�'�AK ❑ FlN. & MGL S6iNCES �IR � Council Research � oePnrmaErir a�croa FOH ❑CfiYAITORNEY O &1DGEf OIRECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTHNT) PERSONAL SERYICE CONiAACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. HasMispersoNfirtneverworkedurideraconVac[forthisdepartmrit? YES NO 2 Has Mis persoNfirtn ever 6een a dty empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Nis personfirtn possess a sla"II rrot nortna0y possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would woreen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for watk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cour� Research Center MAY 3 0 2Q�0 GVIL SFRNCE COMAVSSION WHICFi COUNqL OBJECTIVE? IOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 31.9tl6,! SOURCE 00-M-0671 A, PIA 00 = wFOanunon: �owwN) B , AST = c. cis oo = 5o,aoo COST1FiEVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIqCLE ON� YES No ACRVITY NUM1iBER C'Da2T7$3-07$�-� ��� C=TY OF ST. PAUL ORDER ��iGii�AL COUNCIL FILE N0. O� SyS By �D����- File o._S00127 - 500133 Voting Ward 5,6 & 7 3S In the Matter of sidewalk recoastructioa, reconstructioa of asphalt sidevoalk aad/or new construction at the following locations: 500127 - South Side West Iowa Avenue from North Chatsworth Street to North Oxford Street. 500128 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. 500129 - Both Sides East Maryland Avenue from Earl Street to Frank Street & West Side Frank Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 500130 - Both Sides Conway Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 500131 - Both Sides East Minnehaha Avenue from North Ruth Street to North Winthrop Street. 500132 - Both Sides East Third Street from North Ruth Street to Pedersen Street. 500133 - East Side Waukon Avenue from Pedersen Street to Ross Avenue. O�/-s�s CRI�i�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oId sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wi&e walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, a� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav (�bse.-� Blakey ✓Bostrom �oleman ,�iarris ,�antry vR' iter Adopted by Council: Date � a Certified Passed by Council Secretary 6 In Favor By '�1 \�� � . �� _-� _ �Against ���/C�G%K�Gfi/ � (�bsev�� �f/�(/� Mayor r Works - Sidewalk Division Tvedt E ON CC GCt# in Wards 5, 6& 7 � WHAT, WHEN, la'I f'�G � J/�U/FIU Od s�� GREEN SHEET Na �o2�s2 wmnwn� ❑ CRY CAUNCIL ❑�'�AK ❑ FlN. & MGL S6iNCES �IR � Council Research � oePnrmaErir a�croa FOH ❑CfiYAITORNEY O &1DGEf OIRECTOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTHNT) PERSONAL SERYICE CONiAACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: 1. HasMispersoNfirtneverworkedurideraconVac[forthisdepartmrit? YES NO 2 Has Mis persoNfirtn ever 6een a dty empioyee? YES NO 3. Does Nis personfirtn possess a sla"II rrot nortna0y possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would woreen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for watk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Cour� Research Center MAY 3 0 2Q�0 GVIL SFRNCE COMAVSSION WHICFi COUNqL OBJECTIVE? IOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 31.9tl6,! SOURCE 00-M-0671 A, PIA 00 = wFOanunon: �owwN) B , AST = c. cis oo = 5o,aoo COST1FiEVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIqCLE ON� YES No ACRVITY NUM1iBER C'Da2T7$3-07$�-� ���