Loading...
00-541CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER OR1Gf�iAL COUNCI FILE N0. �O� S�{ � 3 I B r File No. 500152 - 500154 Voting Ward 1,2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction aad reconstruction with integral curb at tSe following locatioas: S00152 - Both Sides North Syndicate Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue. 500153 - South Side East Page Street from Woodbury Street to Brown Avenue at 315 Page Street Only. 500154 - Both Sides Bush Avenue from East Seventh Street to Forest Street, East Side Forest Street from East Seventh Street to Wells Street, North Side East Seventh Street from Bush Avenue to Earl Street & South Side East Seventh Street from East Minnehaha Avenue to Forest Street. QRIGff�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. 00 -s�11 A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square £oot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28t" dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �bs<.-� �Blakey �strom :�'oleman �rris �ntry �e'iter Adopted by Council: Date� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Co In Favor By -----�� � Against /�-���v�/�Ti/ �i-}hSen� Y'f�10�� MaYor � � r , � unr� � �-uw ��, +�r �l;.il/�1(J o o- s� � TMEM/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATEO 27b..3 �Works-SidewalkDivision 5-23-00 GREEN SHEET NO. j2— CTPEftSONBPNONE �NmAVDATE lNRIAVDAiE I� DEPARTMENf DIRECTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Tvedt (266-6087) ASSIGN �CfTYATfOflNEY ❑CT'CLERK �EONCWNCILAGENDABV(DA"fE) l7 R��GFOR � � � BUDGEf DIFECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SER410E5 DIR. �C •�1�� �`� I�MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) (�COUncilResearch A OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CLIP ALL LOCA ONS FOR SIGNANF� uASSOCIATE u DEPr GCAU lRERUE5TED . nsWct Sidewalk & ReconsKuct Sidewa4k With Integraf Curb in Wards 1, 2 R 7 CIB CqMMffTEE STAFF NMIGH COUNC�L OBJEC(1VE? CIVIL SEANCE CAMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING flUESTIONS: 7. Has this personlfimi ever wofketl wMer a contract for ihis departmeM? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a city empbyee? YES NO 3. Ooes this person/fittn possess a skill not nom�ally possessed 6y a�y cuttent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHYy. The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service.life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik co�dition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its ciUzens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicaliy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haff the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. FPPROVEO: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more_personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. CQldi� R�G1fC�t C8�1f8P ��Y 3 � 2000 AMOUN7 OF TpANSAC710N iGSOURCE OO Al INFpRMAT10N: (EXPUIIN) A� YIA UU = bZU�UUU B, AST = 3 �0 0 C. CIB oo = 5fl,000 COSUpEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINIiY NUMBEft C00-2T753-OT NO � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER OR1Gf�iAL COUNCI FILE N0. �O� S�{ � 3 I B r File No. 500152 - 500154 Voting Ward 1,2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction aad reconstruction with integral curb at tSe following locatioas: S00152 - Both Sides North Syndicate Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue. 500153 - South Side East Page Street from Woodbury Street to Brown Avenue at 315 Page Street Only. 500154 - Both Sides Bush Avenue from East Seventh Street to Forest Street, East Side Forest Street from East Seventh Street to Wells Street, North Side East Seventh Street from Bush Avenue to Earl Street & South Side East Seventh Street from East Minnehaha Avenue to Forest Street. QRIGff�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. 00 -s�11 A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square £oot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28t" dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �bs<.-� �Blakey �strom :�'oleman �rris �ntry �e'iter Adopted by Council: Date� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Co In Favor By -----�� � Against /�-���v�/�Ti/ �i-}hSen� Y'f�10�� MaYor � � r , � unr� � �-uw ��, +�r �l;.il/�1(J o o- s� � TMEM/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATEO 27b..3 �Works-SidewalkDivision 5-23-00 GREEN SHEET NO. j2— CTPEftSONBPNONE �NmAVDATE lNRIAVDAiE I� DEPARTMENf DIRECTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Tvedt (266-6087) ASSIGN �CfTYATfOflNEY ❑CT'CLERK �EONCWNCILAGENDABV(DA"fE) l7 R��GFOR � � � BUDGEf DIFECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SER410E5 DIR. �C •�1�� �`� I�MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) (�COUncilResearch A OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CLIP ALL LOCA ONS FOR SIGNANF� uASSOCIATE u DEPr GCAU lRERUE5TED . nsWct Sidewalk & ReconsKuct Sidewa4k With Integraf Curb in Wards 1, 2 R 7 CIB CqMMffTEE STAFF NMIGH COUNC�L OBJEC(1VE? CIVIL SEANCE CAMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING flUESTIONS: 7. Has this personlfimi ever wofketl wMer a contract for ihis departmeM? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a city empbyee? YES NO 3. Ooes this person/fittn possess a skill not nom�ally possessed 6y a�y cuttent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHYy. The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service.life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik co�dition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its ciUzens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicaliy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haff the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. FPPROVEO: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more_personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. CQldi� R�G1fC�t C8�1f8P ��Y 3 � 2000 AMOUN7 OF TpANSAC710N iGSOURCE OO Al INFpRMAT10N: (EXPUIIN) A� YIA UU = bZU�UUU B, AST = 3 �0 0 C. CIB oo = 5fl,000 COSUpEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINIiY NUMBEft C00-2T753-OT NO � CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER OR1Gf�iAL COUNCI FILE N0. �O� S�{ � 3 I B r File No. 500152 - 500154 Voting Ward 1,2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction aad reconstruction with integral curb at tSe following locatioas: S00152 - Both Sides North Syndicate Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue. 500153 - South Side East Page Street from Woodbury Street to Brown Avenue at 315 Page Street Only. 500154 - Both Sides Bush Avenue from East Seventh Street to Forest Street, East Side Forest Street from East Seventh Street to Wells Street, North Side East Seventh Street from Bush Avenue to Earl Street & South Side East Seventh Street from East Minnehaha Avenue to Forest Street. QRIGff�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDEI3TIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. 00 -s�11 A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square £oot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28t" dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �nanav �bs<.-� �Blakey �strom :�'oleman �rris �ntry �e'iter Adopted by Council: Date� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Co In Favor By -----�� � Against /�-���v�/�Ti/ �i-}hSen� Y'f�10�� MaYor � � r , � unr� � �-uw ��, +�r �l;.il/�1(J o o- s� � TMEM/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATEO 27b..3 �Works-SidewalkDivision 5-23-00 GREEN SHEET NO. j2— CTPEftSONBPNONE �NmAVDATE lNRIAVDAiE I� DEPARTMENf DIRECTOR ❑ CT' CAUNCIL Tvedt (266-6087) ASSIGN �CfTYATfOflNEY ❑CT'CLERK �EONCWNCILAGENDABV(DA"fE) l7 R��GFOR � � � BUDGEf DIFECTOR ❑ FlN. & MGT. SER410E5 DIR. �C •�1�� �`� I�MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) (�COUncilResearch A OF SIGNATURE PAGES _(CLIP ALL LOCA ONS FOR SIGNANF� uASSOCIATE u DEPr GCAU lRERUE5TED . nsWct Sidewalk & ReconsKuct Sidewa4k With Integraf Curb in Wards 1, 2 R 7 CIB CqMMffTEE STAFF NMIGH COUNC�L OBJEC(1VE? CIVIL SEANCE CAMMISSION PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING flUESTIONS: 7. Has this personlfimi ever wofketl wMer a contract for ihis departmeM? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfimi ever been a city empbyee? YES NO 3. Ooes this person/fittn possess a skill not nom�ally possessed 6y a�y cuttent ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WHYy. The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service.life limits, chemical additives, e�ctreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik co�dition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its ciUzens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicaliy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haff the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. FPPROVEO: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more_personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. CQldi� R�G1fC�t C8�1f8P ��Y 3 � 2000 AMOUN7 OF TpANSAC710N iGSOURCE OO Al INFpRMAT10N: (EXPUIIN) A� YIA UU = bZU�UUU B, AST = 3 �0 0 C. CIB oo = 5fl,000 COSUpEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACINIiY NUMBEft C00-2T753-OT NO �