Loading...
00-540CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGIS��L COUNCIL FILE NO O� S�{O B y — Fil No. 134 - S00 41 Voting Ward 1,3 & 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at tha followiag locations: 30 500134 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Albert Street to South Hamline Avenue. 500135 - Both sides Grand Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East Side South Hamline Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Grand Avenue. 500136 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street_ 500137 - South Side Grand Avenue from South Syndicate Street to Ayd Mill Road. 500138 - West Side North Grotto Street from Iglehart Avenue to Carroll Avenue at 283 North Grotto Street Only. 500139 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 500140 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. 500141 - South Side Edmund Avenue from Aldine Street to Fry Street at 1658 Edmund Avenue Only. OR1Gl�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ao - syo RES2DENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per fronC foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "3ong side" of the property. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � R] That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �b5c..� = Blakey ✓Bostrom ,�ol eman vHarris ,�L�antry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date c_„(�.,.a ^ r J ��,0�0 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By c� � � � �Against � t e9��(prB� Mayor v p'�'l!� II�� u �IvG. : Works - Sidewalk Division �T FERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266-608� E ON COUNGI.AGENDA @Y (OATEI "1 �tIUV t OFSIGNANFEPAGES _ (CLIPALLIACATIONSFORSIGNA'NR� Sidewalk in Wards 1, 3& 4 � STAFF CMLSEftY10E C�MMISSION IGREEN : � �EPARiMENT DIRECiOR a CtTY ATT�RNEY � BUDGEf DIftECTOq � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANI) NO. 102761 ❑ CRY CAVNCII ❑ C(TY CLERK ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES Dlq. 0 Council Research I I DEPT. ACE UP7� . PERSOSIAL SERYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING 4UESTIONS: 1. HasthispersonlfirtneverworkedunderacrontractforlFiisdepartmenY? YES NO 2. Has Ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this personfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed 6y any current city employee? YES NO Ezplain a11 yes answers on separate shret and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. OISADVANTAGESIF Historicalfy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiii generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weil as claim Qayouts. C�unc� Research Genter ��Y � 0 2000 10UNT OF TRANSACTION $ soudce DO-M-O6 (EXPLAfIC) A, PIA 00 = 620,.000 B. AST = 365>000 C, CIB 00 = 5Q,0�o NUMBER YS�t `✓l�/UU oa-s�a �CIRCLE ONE) ( YES� NO CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGIS��L COUNCIL FILE NO O� S�{O B y — Fil No. 134 - S00 41 Voting Ward 1,3 & 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at tha followiag locations: 30 500134 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Albert Street to South Hamline Avenue. 500135 - Both sides Grand Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East Side South Hamline Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Grand Avenue. 500136 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street_ 500137 - South Side Grand Avenue from South Syndicate Street to Ayd Mill Road. 500138 - West Side North Grotto Street from Iglehart Avenue to Carroll Avenue at 283 North Grotto Street Only. 500139 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 500140 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. 500141 - South Side Edmund Avenue from Aldine Street to Fry Street at 1658 Edmund Avenue Only. OR1Gl�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ao - syo RES2DENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per fronC foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "3ong side" of the property. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � R] That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �b5c..� = Blakey ✓Bostrom ,�ol eman vHarris ,�L�antry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date c_„(�.,.a ^ r J ��,0�0 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By c� � � � �Against � t e9��(prB� Mayor v p'�'l!� II�� u �IvG. : Works - Sidewalk Division �T FERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266-608� E ON COUNGI.AGENDA @Y (OATEI "1 �tIUV t OFSIGNANFEPAGES _ (CLIPALLIACATIONSFORSIGNA'NR� Sidewalk in Wards 1, 3& 4 � STAFF CMLSEftY10E C�MMISSION IGREEN : � �EPARiMENT DIRECiOR a CtTY ATT�RNEY � BUDGEf DIftECTOq � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANI) NO. 102761 ❑ CRY CAVNCII ❑ C(TY CLERK ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES Dlq. 0 Council Research I I DEPT. ACE UP7� . PERSOSIAL SERYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING 4UESTIONS: 1. HasthispersonlfirtneverworkedunderacrontractforlFiisdepartmenY? YES NO 2. Has Ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this personfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed 6y any current city employee? YES NO Ezplain a11 yes answers on separate shret and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. OISADVANTAGESIF Historicalfy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiii generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weil as claim Qayouts. C�unc� Research Genter ��Y � 0 2000 10UNT OF TRANSACTION $ soudce DO-M-O6 (EXPLAfIC) A, PIA 00 = 620,.000 B. AST = 365>000 C, CIB 00 = 5Q,0�o NUMBER YS�t `✓l�/UU oa-s�a �CIRCLE ONE) ( YES� NO CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGIS��L COUNCIL FILE NO O� S�{O B y — Fil No. 134 - S00 41 Voting Ward 1,3 & 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at tha followiag locations: 30 500134 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Albert Street to South Hamline Avenue. 500135 - Both sides Grand Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East Side South Hamline Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Grand Avenue. 500136 - Both Sides Grand Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to South Saratoga Street_ 500137 - South Side Grand Avenue from South Syndicate Street to Ayd Mill Road. 500138 - West Side North Grotto Street from Iglehart Avenue to Carroll Avenue at 283 North Grotto Street Only. 500139 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Oxford Street. 500140 - Both Sides Hubbard Avenue from North Oxford Street to North Chatsworth Street. 500141 - South Side Edmund Avenue from Aldine Street to Fry Street at 1658 Edmund Avenue Only. OR1Gl�IAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES ao - syo RES2DENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction ireplacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per fronC foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "3ong side" of the property. Mi1LTI-RESIDENTSAL(More than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � R] That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �b5c..� = Blakey ✓Bostrom ,�ol eman vHarris ,�L�antry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date c_„(�.,.a ^ r J ��,0�0 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By c� � � � �Against � t e9��(prB� Mayor v p'�'l!� II�� u �IvG. : Works - Sidewalk Division �T FERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266-608� E ON COUNGI.AGENDA @Y (OATEI "1 �tIUV t OFSIGNANFEPAGES _ (CLIPALLIACATIONSFORSIGNA'NR� Sidewalk in Wards 1, 3& 4 � STAFF CMLSEftY10E C�MMISSION IGREEN : � �EPARiMENT DIRECiOR a CtTY ATT�RNEY � BUDGEf DIftECTOq � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANI) NO. 102761 ❑ CRY CAVNCII ❑ C(TY CLERK ❑ FlN. & MGT. SERVICES Dlq. 0 Council Research I I DEPT. ACE UP7� . PERSOSIAL SERYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING 4UESTIONS: 1. HasthispersonlfirtneverworkedunderacrontractforlFiisdepartmenY? YES NO 2. Has Ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does this personfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed 6y any current city employee? YES NO Ezplain a11 yes answers on separate shret and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple probiems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. OISADVANTAGESIF Historicalfy, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiii generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weil as claim Qayouts. C�unc� Research Genter ��Y � 0 2000 10UNT OF TRANSACTION $ soudce DO-M-O6 (EXPLAfIC) A, PIA 00 = 620,.000 B. AST = 365>000 C, CIB 00 = 5Q,0�o NUMBER YS�t `✓l�/UU oa-s�a �CIRCLE ONE) ( YES� NO