00-538C22'Y OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
OR1GlNAL
COUNCIL FILE NO_ �� S3B�
By
File S00 7 - 5001
Voting Ward 1,2,3 & 4
Gi+]
Ia the Matter of sidemalk reconstructioa, recoastruction mith integral curb and/or
new coastruatioa at the followiag locatioas:
500107 - North side Milton Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue_
S00108 - Both sides Fulton Street from Palace Avenue to Jefferson Avenue & South Side
Jefferson Avenue from Fulton Street to West to alley.
500109 - North side Tuscarora Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue at
721 & 729 Tiscarora Avenue Only.
500110 - Both sides Tuscarora Avenue from West Seventh Street to Bay Street.
500111 - South Side Bayard Avenue from Mount Curve Boulevard to South Cretin Avenue.
500112 - Both sides South Cretin Avenue from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue.
500113 - Both Sides Saunders Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to Davern Street.
500114 - Both sides Sumner Street from Norfolk Avenue to Sheridan Avenue & South 9ide
Sheridan Avenue from Sumner Street to South Prior Avenue.
60�115 - Both sides Carter Avenue from Keston Street to Como Avenue.
500116 - West Side North Cleveland Avenue from Hendon Avenue to Dudley Avenue & South
Side Dudley Avenue from North Cleveland Avenue to West to a11ey.
ORIGINAL
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
oe - S3p'
RESIDENTIAL RATES_(One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 20Q0 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
vBenanav
(a� Blakey
�ostrom
�leman
�rris
�antry
�iR�'iter
Adopted by Council: Date Q� rl 2po�p
v� > —
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By ��� - � �
O Against ���'( 1�T�7�24�Y'i/�l
! 1�-bse-�.� ���f� Mayor
vi/l-aL
��tauc
&4
Works - Sidewaik Division
I �-- l
ROPSIGNANREPAGES _ (CIIPALL
SIGNAillfl�
I��1 ✓/IU/�j� aa-S3�'
GREEN SHEET
iwmawn�
� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR
OCIT'ATTORNEY
� BUDGEf DIRECfOR
� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102758
wmnwa� �
❑cmcouNa�
❑ CRY CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGf. SERVICES DIR.
Q Council Research I
� I DEPT. ACCOUNIA! �I
Sidewafk With Integral Curb, Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Existing Sidewalk & Construct New Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2,
Wh11CHGWNCI� O&IECTIVE?
COMMISSION
F�plain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob4ems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falfs and possible litigations.
APPqOVEO'
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconsiruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-halt the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal +njury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim ayouis.
Coursc� Research Cent�r'
MAY 3 0 2000
IOUPJT Of THANSAC710M $ � 4 �� OL ��� COSTJA£VENUE BUDGE7ED (CfRCLE ONE)
souace 00-M-0671 A, P�A 00 = 2Q,000 pCIN[TYNU7ABER C00-2T753-07�
�NFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) ! = a ..,..._...,.._ ,
�• C�B �� � 50��0�
PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS:
CML SERVICE CoMMIS51oN 1, Has this perSONfirtn ever wodcBd untler a COn[f3ct for this tlepaAmentl
YES NO
2. Has this persoMfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
YES NO
3. Does this personJfirm possess a skiil not nortna�iy possessetl by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
��y c_v Gvvv
IDAlEiNITATED
NO
C22'Y OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
OR1GlNAL
COUNCIL FILE NO_ �� S3B�
By
File S00 7 - 5001
Voting Ward 1,2,3 & 4
Gi+]
Ia the Matter of sidemalk reconstructioa, recoastruction mith integral curb and/or
new coastruatioa at the followiag locatioas:
500107 - North side Milton Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue_
S00108 - Both sides Fulton Street from Palace Avenue to Jefferson Avenue & South Side
Jefferson Avenue from Fulton Street to West to alley.
500109 - North side Tuscarora Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue at
721 & 729 Tiscarora Avenue Only.
500110 - Both sides Tuscarora Avenue from West Seventh Street to Bay Street.
500111 - South Side Bayard Avenue from Mount Curve Boulevard to South Cretin Avenue.
500112 - Both sides South Cretin Avenue from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue.
500113 - Both Sides Saunders Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to Davern Street.
500114 - Both sides Sumner Street from Norfolk Avenue to Sheridan Avenue & South 9ide
Sheridan Avenue from Sumner Street to South Prior Avenue.
60�115 - Both sides Carter Avenue from Keston Street to Como Avenue.
500116 - West Side North Cleveland Avenue from Hendon Avenue to Dudley Avenue & South
Side Dudley Avenue from North Cleveland Avenue to West to a11ey.
ORIGINAL
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
oe - S3p'
RESIDENTIAL RATES_(One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 20Q0 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
vBenanav
(a� Blakey
�ostrom
�leman
�rris
�antry
�iR�'iter
Adopted by Council: Date Q� rl 2po�p
v� > —
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By ��� - � �
O Against ���'( 1�T�7�24�Y'i/�l
! 1�-bse-�.� ���f� Mayor
vi/l-aL
��tauc
&4
Works - Sidewaik Division
I �-- l
ROPSIGNANREPAGES _ (CIIPALL
SIGNAillfl�
I��1 ✓/IU/�j� aa-S3�'
GREEN SHEET
iwmawn�
� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR
OCIT'ATTORNEY
� BUDGEf DIRECfOR
� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102758
wmnwa� �
❑cmcouNa�
❑ CRY CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGf. SERVICES DIR.
Q Council Research I
� I DEPT. ACCOUNIA! �I
Sidewafk With Integral Curb, Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Existing Sidewalk & Construct New Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2,
Wh11CHGWNCI� O&IECTIVE?
COMMISSION
F�plain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob4ems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falfs and possible litigations.
APPqOVEO'
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconsiruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-halt the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal +njury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim ayouis.
Coursc� Research Cent�r'
MAY 3 0 2000
IOUPJT Of THANSAC710M $ � 4 �� OL ��� COSTJA£VENUE BUDGE7ED (CfRCLE ONE)
souace 00-M-0671 A, P�A 00 = 2Q,000 pCIN[TYNU7ABER C00-2T753-07�
�NFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) ! = a ..,..._...,.._ ,
�• C�B �� � 50��0�
PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS:
CML SERVICE CoMMIS51oN 1, Has this perSONfirtn ever wodcBd untler a COn[f3ct for this tlepaAmentl
YES NO
2. Has this persoMfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
YES NO
3. Does this personJfirm possess a skiil not nortna�iy possessetl by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
��y c_v Gvvv
IDAlEiNITATED
NO
C22'Y OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
OR1GlNAL
COUNCIL FILE NO_ �� S3B�
By
File S00 7 - 5001
Voting Ward 1,2,3 & 4
Gi+]
Ia the Matter of sidemalk reconstructioa, recoastruction mith integral curb and/or
new coastruatioa at the followiag locatioas:
500107 - North side Milton Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue_
S00108 - Both sides Fulton Street from Palace Avenue to Jefferson Avenue & South Side
Jefferson Avenue from Fulton Street to West to alley.
500109 - North side Tuscarora Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue at
721 & 729 Tiscarora Avenue Only.
500110 - Both sides Tuscarora Avenue from West Seventh Street to Bay Street.
500111 - South Side Bayard Avenue from Mount Curve Boulevard to South Cretin Avenue.
500112 - Both sides South Cretin Avenue from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue.
500113 - Both Sides Saunders Avenue from South Fairview Avenue to Davern Street.
500114 - Both sides Sumner Street from Norfolk Avenue to Sheridan Avenue & South 9ide
Sheridan Avenue from Sumner Street to South Prior Avenue.
60�115 - Both sides Carter Avenue from Keston Street to Como Avenue.
500116 - West Side North Cleveland Avenue from Hendon Avenue to Dudley Avenue & South
Side Dudley Avenue from North Cleveland Avenue to West to a11ey.
ORIGINAL
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
oe - S3p'
RESIDENTIAL RATES_(One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESSDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 20Q0 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of June, 2000
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
vBenanav
(a� Blakey
�ostrom
�leman
�rris
�antry
�iR�'iter
Adopted by Council: Date Q� rl 2po�p
v� > —
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By ��� - � �
O Against ���'( 1�T�7�24�Y'i/�l
! 1�-bse-�.� ���f� Mayor
vi/l-aL
��tauc
&4
Works - Sidewaik Division
I �-- l
ROPSIGNANREPAGES _ (CIIPALL
SIGNAillfl�
I��1 ✓/IU/�j� aa-S3�'
GREEN SHEET
iwmawn�
� DEPARiMENT DIRECTOR
OCIT'ATTORNEY
� BUDGEf DIRECfOR
� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102758
wmnwa� �
❑cmcouNa�
❑ CRY CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGf. SERVICES DIR.
Q Council Research I
� I DEPT. ACCOUNIA! �I
Sidewafk With Integral Curb, Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Existing Sidewalk & Construct New Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2,
Wh11CHGWNCI� O&IECTIVE?
COMMISSION
F�plain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
The problem "defiective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob4ems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falfs and possible litigations.
APPqOVEO'
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconsiruction has created negative fieedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-halt the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for waik reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal +njury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim ayouis.
Coursc� Research Cent�r'
MAY 3 0 2000
IOUPJT Of THANSAC710M $ � 4 �� OL ��� COSTJA£VENUE BUDGE7ED (CfRCLE ONE)
souace 00-M-0671 A, P�A 00 = 2Q,000 pCIN[TYNU7ABER C00-2T753-07�
�NFORMAiION:(IXPLAIN) ! = a ..,..._...,.._ ,
�• C�B �� � 50��0�
PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS:
CML SERVICE CoMMIS51oN 1, Has this perSONfirtn ever wodcBd untler a COn[f3ct for this tlepaAmentl
YES NO
2. Has this persoMfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
YES NO
3. Does this personJfirm possess a skiil not nortna�iy possessetl by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
��y c_v Gvvv
IDAlEiNITATED
NO