The URL can be used to link to this page

00-422CSTY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGINAL cotmr zL Fz No. oo - ya�- � L By �S Fil o. 500096 - 500106 Voting Ward 1 & 5 Ia the Matter of sideavalk raconstruction at the follovring locations: �� 500096 - Both sides Blair Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Avon Street. 500097 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North Grotto Street to North St. Albans Street. 500098 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North St. Albans Street to North Dale Street. 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. 500100 - Both sides North Avon Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue. 50�1�1 - Both sides North Avon Street from Aatch Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500102 - Both sides Colne Street from Como Avenue to South to 1088 Colne Street. 500103 - Both sides Colne Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500104 - Both sides North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500105 - Both sides Ryde Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500106 - Both sides North Victoria Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 00 - V S�- '; ��vli�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTS-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24"' dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays '�enanav ✓Blakey ✓f3o s trom ✓C`o l eman �Ffarris �Lantry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date_��cJdc� Certified Passed by Council Se etary I In Favor By c�- _ �Against �� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division � Tvedt (266-6087) BE ON COUNQL AGENDA BV (DAT� 9 OF SIGNANRE PAGES G �� i�G��uv r NO. 102754 � DEPAFTiMENT DIRECTOR FOR �CRYATfORNEY � BUDGET OIRECTOF � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ALL LOCATIONS fOP SIGNATUR� wmnwa� ❑ cm couNa� ❑ cm c�aK ❑ PIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. ❑j Gouncil Research I I DEPL AC NTA Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 5(See attached list) d�'�� I 5 � �ECOMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE POLLOWING QUE5TION5: _Pi.atdNiNGCOntMissioN CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i. HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderacontractforthisdepartment? qBCOMMfiTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? ? STnFF _ YES NO O&IECTNE? PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY} 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any cument ciry employee? YES NO �plain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicalty, the s+dewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construct+on procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �ioUtfC� R�se�mh �`�?�t'(�� i� � � ��Q AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 53 .OJS .00 COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE ��' M'�6]� A. PIA 00 = 620;000 pCINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 AIINFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � AST = 3b5 �OOO C� C�B �� 5��0�� CSTY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGINAL cotmr zL Fz No. oo - ya�- � L By �S Fil o. 500096 - 500106 Voting Ward 1 & 5 Ia the Matter of sideavalk raconstruction at the follovring locations: �� 500096 - Both sides Blair Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Avon Street. 500097 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North Grotto Street to North St. Albans Street. 500098 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North St. Albans Street to North Dale Street. 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. 500100 - Both sides North Avon Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue. 50�1�1 - Both sides North Avon Street from Aatch Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500102 - Both sides Colne Street from Como Avenue to South to 1088 Colne Street. 500103 - Both sides Colne Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500104 - Both sides North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500105 - Both sides Ryde Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500106 - Both sides North Victoria Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 00 - V S�- '; ��vli�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTS-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24"' dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays '�enanav ✓Blakey ✓f3o s trom ✓C`o l eman �Ffarris �Lantry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date_��cJdc� Certified Passed by Council Se etary I In Favor By c�- _ �Against �� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division � Tvedt (266-6087) BE ON COUNQL AGENDA BV (DAT� 9 OF SIGNANRE PAGES G �� i�G��uv r NO. 102754 � DEPAFTiMENT DIRECTOR FOR �CRYATfORNEY � BUDGET OIRECTOF � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ALL LOCATIONS fOP SIGNATUR� wmnwa� ❑ cm couNa� ❑ cm c�aK ❑ PIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. ❑j Gouncil Research I I DEPL AC NTA Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 5(See attached list) d�'�� I 5 � �ECOMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE POLLOWING QUE5TION5: _Pi.atdNiNGCOntMissioN CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i. HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderacontractforthisdepartment? qBCOMMfiTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? ? STnFF _ YES NO O&IECTNE? PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY} 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any cument ciry employee? YES NO �plain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicalty, the s+dewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construct+on procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �ioUtfC� R�se�mh �`�?�t'(�� i� � � ��Q AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 53 .OJS .00 COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE ��' M'�6]� A. PIA 00 = 620;000 pCINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 AIINFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � AST = 3b5 �OOO C� C�B �� 5��0�� CSTY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMINARY ORDER QRIGINAL cotmr zL Fz No. oo - ya�- � L By �S Fil o. 500096 - 500106 Voting Ward 1 & 5 Ia the Matter of sideavalk raconstruction at the follovring locations: �� 500096 - Both sides Blair Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Avon Street. 500097 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North Grotto Street to North St. Albans Street. 500098 - Both sides Thomas Avenue from North St. Albans Street to North Dale Street. 500099 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from North Victoria Street to North Grotto Street. 500100 - Both sides North Avon Street from Front Avenue to Hatch Avenue. 50�1�1 - Both sides North Avon Street from Aatch Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500102 - Both sides Colne Street from Como Avenue to South to 1088 Colne Street. 500103 - Both sides Colne Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500104 - Both sides North Milton Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500105 - Both sides Ryde Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 500106 - Both sides North Victoria Street from Front Avenue to Orchard Avenue. 00 - V S�- '; ��vli�AL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTS-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24"' dav of Mav, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays '�enanav ✓Blakey ✓f3o s trom ✓C`o l eman �Ffarris �Lantry �eiter Adopted by Council: Date_��cJdc� Certified Passed by Council Se etary I In Favor By c�- _ �Against �� Mayor Works - Sidewalk Division � Tvedt (266-6087) BE ON COUNQL AGENDA BV (DAT� 9 OF SIGNANRE PAGES G �� i�G��uv r NO. 102754 � DEPAFTiMENT DIRECTOR FOR �CRYATfORNEY � BUDGET OIRECTOF � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) ALL LOCATIONS fOP SIGNATUR� wmnwa� ❑ cm couNa� ❑ cm c�aK ❑ PIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. ❑j Gouncil Research I I DEPL AC NTA Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1& 5(See attached list) d�'�� I 5 � �ECOMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE POLLOWING QUE5TION5: _Pi.atdNiNGCOntMissioN CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i. HasthispersoNfirtneverworketlunderacontractforthisdepartment? qBCOMMfiTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? ? STnFF _ YES NO O&IECTNE? PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY} 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any cument ciry employee? YES NO �plain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historicalty, the s+dewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construct+on procedures and assessments. Properry owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �ioUtfC� R�se�mh �`�?�t'(�� i� � � ��Q AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 53 .OJS .00 COST/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE ��' M'�6]� A. PIA 00 = 620;000 pCINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-00000 AIINFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � AST = 3b5 �OOO C� C�B �� 5��0��