Loading...
00-309CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELSMINARY ORDER COUNCIL F E O �3Oq By File No_ 500036 - 500045 Voting Ward_ 2_ In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at the following locations: 3a 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. t ( ! P' 1�I.KNE�J ;" 11 Oo_3� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 oorner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. t 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul_ That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays (�`ase�{'—° Benanav �akey �strom r�oleman Q(J���$}{"�T� �I-drr i s �antry pppsL4� �iter ���� G In Favor �_Against t f� s�,.,� Adopted by Council: Date��� o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY t >�� I —� � �--- �� ����� MaYor ' �nF`�ioc�c«,NOn.'1►� �— , � 7 l� ��Y LtVV o 1 , o2�aa ab"3 PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision -75-00 REEN SHEET �O� INRIlLL/DATE ACTPERSONdPMDNE �DEPAiTIMENTpfiECfOfi ❑GttWUNCI� rtyTVedt (266-6OS� ` �" �crrvArrowaer ❑crzvavvK i „ � _ Hu�reen Fon � HE ON CIXMpIAGENDA BV (DAT� 9 z'- ROUiMG � W WEf DIRECfOR ❑ FlN. d MGT. SERVICES DIR s% ' ONDEN 4P r�wvoR�oAas.wru+t� QCouncilAesearch AttOF51GN�7LBEVPG6 _ (CUG LOf'.AiIONSFORSNiN1l'fUN� �AS.^>OGA7E uDEPi. NT PEp7E5Tm - , ReconsWCt Sidewatk in Ward 2(See attached Nst) ► �_ - ca�M�wraNS: �wa�e W«Re�az (R) . VERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOLLOW WG QUES710NS: vW�wNGCO1.�MisS�ON _GV1tsEAVN:ECD�A9SSqN t. HasihispersoNfirtneverwakedunderacontrac[torihisdepartment?� _GBCO�la�"!g YES td0 A �� — 2. Has tlus persoNfirtn everbeen a city emPlq'ee? — YES NO V asrtt�crcot�a� _ 3. �Does trris persoNfrtn Bossess a sldU not (wrmaM P�ed M e^Y �^� «h �Y�? ePO�t5wf7�tfc�q�08�ECt�VEZ YES NO �Explain ali yes answers on sapante aheet and aimch to green shee[ Z INfMTWG PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTI1NT' (WHO. W11AT. WIEN. WHERE. M/M1�: The problem `defective sidewalk' was caused by mu@ip{e prob�ems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycies, service life 1imRs, chemical addftives, exiFeme temQerature va�ations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annually. Left uncorrected the sidewalk conditiortwould worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible iftigations. RDVANTAGESIFAPPROV@. The community wili benefft from this project because it will provide safe defect f�ee sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a result. MSHDVAMTAGESIFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despRe the faci that up to one-haH the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess tor walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. Council R��ear�h Ge�ter �A�c G 9 ZQ�l asnovurracES ic nor,�aoveo: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of {arger dotiar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. Cour��! Rasearch C�nter MAR 0 8 2Q40 OTAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTKIN S 39 � . 52 CpgT/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO �owcso�r� oo-rt•o67t ;a PIA 00 = 20�000 pCrtyRyNUMBER �o-2nss-o�sa- Fir+u+c+atwwa�uunorc�owwro� S. AST � , C. ClB d0 = 50,OOQ .. . CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELSMINARY ORDER COUNCIL F E O �3Oq By File No_ 500036 - 500045 Voting Ward_ 2_ In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at the following locations: 3a 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. t ( ! P' 1�I.KNE�J ;" 11 Oo_3� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 oorner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. t 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul_ That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays (�`ase�{'—° Benanav �akey �strom r�oleman Q(J���$}{"�T� �I-drr i s �antry pppsL4� �iter ���� G In Favor �_Against t f� s�,.,� Adopted by Council: Date��� o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY t >�� I —� � �--- �� ����� MaYor ' �nF`�ioc�c«,NOn.'1►� �— , � 7 l� ��Y LtVV o 1 , o2�aa ab"3 PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision -75-00 REEN SHEET �O� INRIlLL/DATE ACTPERSONdPMDNE �DEPAiTIMENTpfiECfOfi ❑GttWUNCI� rtyTVedt (266-6OS� ` �" �crrvArrowaer ❑crzvavvK i „ � _ Hu�reen Fon � HE ON CIXMpIAGENDA BV (DAT� 9 z'- ROUiMG � W WEf DIRECfOR ❑ FlN. d MGT. SERVICES DIR s% ' ONDEN 4P r�wvoR�oAas.wru+t� QCouncilAesearch AttOF51GN�7LBEVPG6 _ (CUG LOf'.AiIONSFORSNiN1l'fUN� �AS.^>OGA7E uDEPi. NT PEp7E5Tm - , ReconsWCt Sidewatk in Ward 2(See attached Nst) ► �_ - ca�M�wraNS: �wa�e W«Re�az (R) . VERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOLLOW WG QUES710NS: vW�wNGCO1.�MisS�ON _GV1tsEAVN:ECD�A9SSqN t. HasihispersoNfirtneverwakedunderacontrac[torihisdepartment?� _GBCO�la�"!g YES td0 A �� — 2. Has tlus persoNfirtn everbeen a city emPlq'ee? — YES NO V asrtt�crcot�a� _ 3. �Does trris persoNfrtn Bossess a sldU not (wrmaM P�ed M e^Y �^� «h �Y�? ePO�t5wf7�tfc�q�08�ECt�VEZ YES NO �Explain ali yes answers on sapante aheet and aimch to green shee[ Z INfMTWG PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTI1NT' (WHO. W11AT. WIEN. WHERE. M/M1�: The problem `defective sidewalk' was caused by mu@ip{e prob�ems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycies, service life 1imRs, chemical addftives, exiFeme temQerature va�ations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annually. Left uncorrected the sidewalk conditiortwould worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible iftigations. RDVANTAGESIFAPPROV@. The community wili benefft from this project because it will provide safe defect f�ee sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a result. MSHDVAMTAGESIFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despRe the faci that up to one-haH the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess tor walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. Council R��ear�h Ge�ter �A�c G 9 ZQ�l asnovurracES ic nor,�aoveo: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of {arger dotiar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. Cour��! Rasearch C�nter MAR 0 8 2Q40 OTAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTKIN S 39 � . 52 CpgT/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO �owcso�r� oo-rt•o67t ;a PIA 00 = 20�000 pCrtyRyNUMBER �o-2nss-o�sa- Fir+u+c+atwwa�uunorc�owwro� S. AST � , C. ClB d0 = 50,OOQ .. . CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELSMINARY ORDER COUNCIL F E O �3Oq By File No_ 500036 - 500045 Voting Ward_ 2_ In the Matter of sidewalk recoastruction at the following locations: 3a 500036 - Both sides South Chatsworth Street from St_ Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500037 - Both sides Fairmount Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. S00038 - Both sides South Grotto Street from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 500039 - South side James Avenue from Bay Street to South Osceola Avenue. 500040 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Chatsworth Street to South Milton Street. 500041 - Both sides Linwood Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500042 - Both sides South Milton Street from St. Clair Avenue to Linwood Avenue. 500043 - Both sides Osceola Avenue from South Avon Street to South Grotto Street. 500044 - North side St. Clair Avenue from South Milton Street to South Victoria Street. 500045 - Both sides Sturgis Street from Garfield Street to Douglas Street. t ( ! P' 1�I.KNE�J ;" 11 Oo_3� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot £or a six (6) £oot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. Al1 oorner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. t 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26 dav of April, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul_ That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays (�`ase�{'—° Benanav �akey �strom r�oleman Q(J���$}{"�T� �I-drr i s �antry pppsL4� �iter ���� G In Favor �_Against t f� s�,.,� Adopted by Council: Date��� o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY t >�� I —� � �--- �� ����� MaYor ' �nF`�ioc�c«,NOn.'1►� �— , � 7 l� ��Y LtVV o 1 , o2�aa ab"3 PublicWorks-SidewalkDivision -75-00 REEN SHEET �O� INRIlLL/DATE ACTPERSONdPMDNE �DEPAiTIMENTpfiECfOfi ❑GttWUNCI� rtyTVedt (266-6OS� ` �" �crrvArrowaer ❑crzvavvK i „ � _ Hu�reen Fon � HE ON CIXMpIAGENDA BV (DAT� 9 z'- ROUiMG � W WEf DIRECfOR ❑ FlN. d MGT. SERVICES DIR s% ' ONDEN 4P r�wvoR�oAas.wru+t� QCouncilAesearch AttOF51GN�7LBEVPG6 _ (CUG LOf'.AiIONSFORSNiN1l'fUN� �AS.^>OGA7E uDEPi. NT PEp7E5Tm - , ReconsWCt Sidewatk in Ward 2(See attached Nst) ► �_ - ca�M�wraNS: �wa�e W«Re�az (R) . VERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS NUST ANSWER THE FOLLOW WG QUES710NS: vW�wNGCO1.�MisS�ON _GV1tsEAVN:ECD�A9SSqN t. HasihispersoNfirtneverwakedunderacontrac[torihisdepartment?� _GBCO�la�"!g YES td0 A �� — 2. Has tlus persoNfirtn everbeen a city emPlq'ee? — YES NO V asrtt�crcot�a� _ 3. �Does trris persoNfrtn Bossess a sldU not (wrmaM P�ed M e^Y �^� «h �Y�? ePO�t5wf7�tfc�q�08�ECt�VEZ YES NO �Explain ali yes answers on sapante aheet and aimch to green shee[ Z INfMTWG PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTI1NT' (WHO. W11AT. WIEN. WHERE. M/M1�: The problem `defective sidewalk' was caused by mu@ip{e prob�ems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycies, service life 1imRs, chemical addftives, exiFeme temQerature va�ations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annually. Left uncorrected the sidewalk conditiortwould worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible iftigations. RDVANTAGESIFAPPROV@. The community wili benefft from this project because it will provide safe defect f�ee sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating pubiic sector jobs as a result. MSHDVAMTAGESIFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despRe the faci that up to one-haH the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess tor walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. Council R��ear�h Ge�ter �A�c G 9 ZQ�l asnovurracES ic nor,�aoveo: This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of {arger dotiar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as claim payouts. Cour��! Rasearch C�nter MAR 0 8 2Q40 OTAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTKIN S 39 � . 52 CpgT/REVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO �owcso�r� oo-rt•o67t ;a PIA 00 = 20�000 pCrtyRyNUMBER �o-2nss-o�sa- Fir+u+c+atwwa�uunorc�owwro� S. AST � , C. ClB d0 = 50,OOQ .. .