Loading...
00-261CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUI�1(.�",IL FILE,N . OO��pS(� � � � By File iNo.�S00046 - 500056 J Voting Ward_ 1,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidevralk reconstruction at the following locatioas: � ` s 500046 - East side North Chatsworth Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue at 975 Selby Avenue. 500047 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Blair Avenue to Van Buren Avenue & South side Van Buren Avenue from Kent Street to Mackubin Street. 500048 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from Mackubin Street to Arundel Street. WARD 5 500049 - Both sides Agate Street from Granite Street to Cayuga Street. 500050 - Both sides Albemarle Street from Front Avenue to West Lawson Avenue. 500051 - Both sides Topping Street from North Western Avenue to Farrington Street. ..� .^ 500052 - East side Edgerton Street from East Hoyt Avenue to East Iowa Avenue. 500053 - Both sides East Magnolia Avenue from Walsh Street to Weide Street. WARD 7 500054 - Both sides Atlantic Street from East Sixth Street to Margaret Street. 500055 - Both sides Margarret street from Frank Street to Duluth Street & South side Margaret Street from Gotzian Street to Duluth Street. 500056 - Both sides Wilson Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. � ��fiiC7i13�� ,�. t, j oo-��� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � �t3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26` dav of Anril, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bse..s ---Benanav ✓$lakey p�� —Bostrom �o l eman ✓F3arr i s ,�antry ,�eiter Adopted by Council: Date ��,.e aa a000 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By � Against / s�GLv� 2.. �b.s�✓.:r 3f7�� / �, Mayor (,d�!% L� Works - Sidewalk Div'sion Tve� t.oew��ous ron sw�utime� & Construct SidexraHc in Yyards 1, 5. 6 8 7(See attached i's[j NO. 10274� iNmaware ❑Gfl'YCOUNCIL �� ❑CfiYGLERK ❑ FlN. & MG7. SERVICES DI0. Q Cotmcil Research _ .. -•• aenso�u� s�v� co►rrencrs rusr nNSw�rs nie Fouowwc nuESTwris: _Cm�sEnv�CECa.e.e55qr+ t. Hastli'spersarYlirmeverwwkedunderacontractforthisdepartrnmt? � YES NO — 2 Has this persoMrtn ever been a ary anpioyce? — YES NO _ 3. Does UR persoNfirtn possess a skll not mm�a�h' P� bY �Y arrent cilY ertpl%'ee? _ YES NO t. � � z � (Wl'10. WHAT. M�N. WHERE. R� i 3-$�DD � FOR uCfiYATTOFWEY � &)O('aET dF�CfOFi � euronton wssisratr) Expkin aN yw mrrers on separate slwt and attneh to gresn shsat The problem 'defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annualiy. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide sa#e defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc[ions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recronsiruction remains a controversiai issue. Council Research Genter This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Councdi Rss2arch Ce�±es MAR Q 8 2000 ,�,����,�: iGSOUFiCE ���M��7� A� NUMBER (CIpCLEONE) ( YES� x0 �Nwr+r.unorr: �ornwN� -- t3 ; AS 1 � SO� � VUU C, CIB 00 = 5d,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUI�1(.�",IL FILE,N . OO��pS(� � � � By File iNo.�S00046 - 500056 J Voting Ward_ 1,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidevralk reconstruction at the following locatioas: � ` s 500046 - East side North Chatsworth Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue at 975 Selby Avenue. 500047 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Blair Avenue to Van Buren Avenue & South side Van Buren Avenue from Kent Street to Mackubin Street. 500048 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from Mackubin Street to Arundel Street. WARD 5 500049 - Both sides Agate Street from Granite Street to Cayuga Street. 500050 - Both sides Albemarle Street from Front Avenue to West Lawson Avenue. 500051 - Both sides Topping Street from North Western Avenue to Farrington Street. ..� .^ 500052 - East side Edgerton Street from East Hoyt Avenue to East Iowa Avenue. 500053 - Both sides East Magnolia Avenue from Walsh Street to Weide Street. WARD 7 500054 - Both sides Atlantic Street from East Sixth Street to Margaret Street. 500055 - Both sides Margarret street from Frank Street to Duluth Street & South side Margaret Street from Gotzian Street to Duluth Street. 500056 - Both sides Wilson Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. � ��fiiC7i13�� ,�. t, j oo-��� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � �t3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26` dav of Anril, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bse..s ---Benanav ✓$lakey p�� —Bostrom �o l eman ✓F3arr i s ,�antry ,�eiter Adopted by Council: Date ��,.e aa a000 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By � Against / s�GLv� 2.. �b.s�✓.:r 3f7�� / �, Mayor (,d�!% L� Works - Sidewalk Div'sion Tve� t.oew��ous ron sw�utime� & Construct SidexraHc in Yyards 1, 5. 6 8 7(See attached i's[j NO. 10274� iNmaware ❑Gfl'YCOUNCIL �� ❑CfiYGLERK ❑ FlN. & MG7. SERVICES DI0. Q Cotmcil Research _ .. -•• aenso�u� s�v� co►rrencrs rusr nNSw�rs nie Fouowwc nuESTwris: _Cm�sEnv�CECa.e.e55qr+ t. Hastli'spersarYlirmeverwwkedunderacontractforthisdepartrnmt? � YES NO — 2 Has this persoMrtn ever been a ary anpioyce? — YES NO _ 3. Does UR persoNfirtn possess a skll not mm�a�h' P� bY �Y arrent cilY ertpl%'ee? _ YES NO t. � � z � (Wl'10. WHAT. M�N. WHERE. R� i 3-$�DD � FOR uCfiYATTOFWEY � &)O('aET dF�CfOFi � euronton wssisratr) Expkin aN yw mrrers on separate slwt and attneh to gresn shsat The problem 'defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annualiy. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide sa#e defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc[ions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recronsiruction remains a controversiai issue. Council Research Genter This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Councdi Rss2arch Ce�±es MAR Q 8 2000 ,�,����,�: iGSOUFiCE ���M��7� A� NUMBER (CIpCLEONE) ( YES� x0 �Nwr+r.unorr: �ornwN� -- t3 ; AS 1 � SO� � VUU C, CIB 00 = 5d,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUI�1(.�",IL FILE,N . OO��pS(� � � � By File iNo.�S00046 - 500056 J Voting Ward_ 1,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidevralk reconstruction at the following locatioas: � ` s 500046 - East side North Chatsworth Street from Selby Avenue to Dayton Avenue at 975 Selby Avenue. 500047 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Blair Avenue to Van Buren Avenue & South side Van Buren Avenue from Kent Street to Mackubin Street. 500048 - Both sides Van Buren Avenue from Mackubin Street to Arundel Street. WARD 5 500049 - Both sides Agate Street from Granite Street to Cayuga Street. 500050 - Both sides Albemarle Street from Front Avenue to West Lawson Avenue. 500051 - Both sides Topping Street from North Western Avenue to Farrington Street. ..� .^ 500052 - East side Edgerton Street from East Hoyt Avenue to East Iowa Avenue. 500053 - Both sides East Magnolia Avenue from Walsh Street to Weide Street. WARD 7 500054 - Both sides Atlantic Street from East Sixth Street to Margaret Street. 500055 - Both sides Margarret street from Frank Street to Duluth Street & South side Margaret Street from Gotzian Street to Duluth Street. 500056 - Both sides Wilson Avenue from Cypress Street to Earl Street. � ��fiiC7i13�� ,�. t, j oo-��� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$9.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $11.58 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.32 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.84 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. � �t3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26` dav of Anril, 2000 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bse..s ---Benanav ✓$lakey p�� —Bostrom �o l eman ✓F3arr i s ,�antry ,�eiter Adopted by Council: Date ��,.e aa a000 Certified Passed by Council Secretary S In Favor By � Against / s�GLv� 2.. �b.s�✓.:r 3f7�� / �, Mayor (,d�!% L� Works - Sidewalk Div'sion Tve� t.oew��ous ron sw�utime� & Construct SidexraHc in Yyards 1, 5. 6 8 7(See attached i's[j NO. 10274� iNmaware ❑Gfl'YCOUNCIL �� ❑CfiYGLERK ❑ FlN. & MG7. SERVICES DI0. Q Cotmcil Research _ .. -•• aenso�u� s�v� co►rrencrs rusr nNSw�rs nie Fouowwc nuESTwris: _Cm�sEnv�CECa.e.e55qr+ t. Hastli'spersarYlirmeverwwkedunderacontractforthisdepartrnmt? � YES NO — 2 Has this persoMrtn ever been a ary anpioyce? — YES NO _ 3. Does UR persoNfirtn possess a skll not mm�a�h' P� bY �Y arrent cilY ertpl%'ee? _ YES NO t. � � z � (Wl'10. WHAT. M�N. WHERE. R� i 3-$�DD � FOR uCfiYATTOFWEY � &)O('aET dF�CfOFi � euronton wssisratr) Expkin aN yw mrrers on separate slwt and attneh to gresn shsat The problem 'defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, eutreme tempereture variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and conected annualiy. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusabfe and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide sa#e defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc[ions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recronsiruction remains a controversiai issue. Council Research Genter This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits, resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Councdi Rss2arch Ce�±es MAR Q 8 2000 ,�,����,�: iGSOUFiCE ���M��7� A� NUMBER (CIpCLEONE) ( YES� x0 �Nwr+r.unorr: �ornwN� -- t3 ; AS 1 � SO� � VUU C, CIB 00 = 5d,000