Loading...
99-494�d� 1 CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER oRi��NA� COUNCIL FILE N0. `� � _l By File o._S9 (�96 - 5991 4 a� Voting Ward_ 1,2,5,6 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 S99096 - Both sides Charles Avenue from Galtier Street to Marion Street. S99097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street. S99098 - East side Galtier Street from Charles Avenue to Edmund Avenue. Ward 2 599�99 - Hamm P1aza surrounded by the following four (4) streets: West Sixth Street, Washington Street, Market Street & St. Peter Street. Ward 5 599100 - West side Edgerton Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599101 - East side North Oxford Street from Stinson Street to Front Avenue. Ward 6 599102 - Both side Duluth Street from East Idaho Avenue to East Larpenteur Avenue. 599103 - East side Edgerton Street £rom East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599104 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue. �lIR1ISNF� �}UL 3 1999 ��-��y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESSDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per £ront foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit up to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul, That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �akey ✓Lso s t rom Coleman� ��5�� �arris xantry vReiter �ttar�cuFn JUL 3 1999 Adopted by Council: Date ��{q� Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary tp In Favor By � � — i c 0 Against l V�-�D Serv� Mayor 5 � tf�1Nf'r � � -� ������ works sldewalRs f PE�pN dPf1ONE Yf�[- �66'6087 ON COUNpL AOEImA 6Y (UA'1� � � t��'f}N l'�UL.�` Z$ti i;� OFSRi1M7UflEPAOES __ construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 5& 6(See attadied list) � � �E; �-z�1 q �!)FPAWfA/ENT pflECfOR � GiV ATfpiNEV O �f qRECiOR � iMYOR (ORAS54SfANT) _ (CLIFALI.IACATIOl/SFORSqi7ATUXE� � � ASSOC�/iE NO. LIE�9�4—� INRIAt/DATE ❑ GfTV COUNCIL ❑CftvQIIiK ❑ RN. S MGT, SEFNICES DIR Q ca,r�a, aesear�n PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TXE FOLLOW WG QUESTIONS: 1. HastlusPe'soN6rtneverwockeduMera�forCdsdepaM�etK? YES NO 2. Has tlds persaJRrm everbeen a ciy ertpbyee? YES P10 3. Does Lus persoNfirtn possess a sidll not nwmaily possessed by arry curtent ciry employee? YES MO E7�iafn all yes answers on aeperaro sheat mM stlaeh to 9reen sheet The pr��em'defecrive sidewalk" was caused by mul�p{e probtems, hee roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life Gmits, chemical addiGves, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncortected, the sidewalk �ition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls arxi possible �itigations. The community will benefit from this project because ic will provide sate defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewatk corrtracts are done by private contractors genera5ng private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures arni assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recor�struction remains a controversiai issue. This opTwn wauld albw the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGS, resuliting in the expeadRure of 4acgec dollar amouMs in repairs as�d rep�acemeM, as weil as cfaim payouts. Ci0U�1CJ� R9SE3fC�1 �i8f�#$f MAY 2 � 1��9 soutu� 99-M A� r�a yy � o�v,00u � s � c, cra 9g a 50,000 NO �d� 1 CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER oRi��NA� COUNCIL FILE N0. `� � _l By File o._S9 (�96 - 5991 4 a� Voting Ward_ 1,2,5,6 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 S99096 - Both sides Charles Avenue from Galtier Street to Marion Street. S99097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street. S99098 - East side Galtier Street from Charles Avenue to Edmund Avenue. Ward 2 599�99 - Hamm P1aza surrounded by the following four (4) streets: West Sixth Street, Washington Street, Market Street & St. Peter Street. Ward 5 599100 - West side Edgerton Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599101 - East side North Oxford Street from Stinson Street to Front Avenue. Ward 6 599102 - Both side Duluth Street from East Idaho Avenue to East Larpenteur Avenue. 599103 - East side Edgerton Street £rom East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599104 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue. �lIR1ISNF� �}UL 3 1999 ��-��y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESSDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per £ront foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit up to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul, That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �akey ✓Lso s t rom Coleman� ��5�� �arris xantry vReiter �ttar�cuFn JUL 3 1999 Adopted by Council: Date ��{q� Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary tp In Favor By � � — i c 0 Against l V�-�D Serv� Mayor 5 � tf�1Nf'r � � -� ������ works sldewalRs f PE�pN dPf1ONE Yf�[- �66'6087 ON COUNpL AOEImA 6Y (UA'1� � � t��'f}N l'�UL.�` Z$ti i;� OFSRi1M7UflEPAOES __ construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 5& 6(See attadied list) � � �E; �-z�1 q �!)FPAWfA/ENT pflECfOR � GiV ATfpiNEV O �f qRECiOR � iMYOR (ORAS54SfANT) _ (CLIFALI.IACATIOl/SFORSqi7ATUXE� � � ASSOC�/iE NO. LIE�9�4—� INRIAt/DATE ❑ GfTV COUNCIL ❑CftvQIIiK ❑ RN. S MGT, SEFNICES DIR Q ca,r�a, aesear�n PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TXE FOLLOW WG QUESTIONS: 1. HastlusPe'soN6rtneverwockeduMera�forCdsdepaM�etK? YES NO 2. Has tlds persaJRrm everbeen a ciy ertpbyee? YES P10 3. Does Lus persoNfirtn possess a sidll not nwmaily possessed by arry curtent ciry employee? YES MO E7�iafn all yes answers on aeperaro sheat mM stlaeh to 9reen sheet The pr��em'defecrive sidewalk" was caused by mul�p{e probtems, hee roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life Gmits, chemical addiGves, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncortected, the sidewalk �ition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls arxi possible �itigations. The community will benefit from this project because ic will provide sate defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewatk corrtracts are done by private contractors genera5ng private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures arni assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recor�struction remains a controversiai issue. This opTwn wauld albw the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGS, resuliting in the expeadRure of 4acgec dollar amouMs in repairs as�d rep�acemeM, as weil as cfaim payouts. Ci0U�1CJ� R9SE3fC�1 �i8f�#$f MAY 2 � 1��9 soutu� 99-M A� r�a yy � o�v,00u � s � c, cra 9g a 50,000 NO �d� 1 CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER oRi��NA� COUNCIL FILE N0. `� � _l By File o._S9 (�96 - 5991 4 a� Voting Ward_ 1,2,5,6 In the Matter of sidemalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 S99096 - Both sides Charles Avenue from Galtier Street to Marion Street. S99097 - Both sides Charles Avenue from North Syndicate Street to North Griggs Street. S99098 - East side Galtier Street from Charles Avenue to Edmund Avenue. Ward 2 599�99 - Hamm P1aza surrounded by the following four (4) streets: West Sixth Street, Washington Street, Market Street & St. Peter Street. Ward 5 599100 - West side Edgerton Street from East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599101 - East side North Oxford Street from Stinson Street to Front Avenue. Ward 6 599102 - Both side Duluth Street from East Idaho Avenue to East Larpenteur Avenue. 599103 - East side Edgerton Street £rom East Rose Avenue to East Maryland Avenue. 599104 - Both sides East Maryland Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue. �lIR1ISNF� �}UL 3 1999 ��-��y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTSON RATES RESSDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per £ront foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk the property. receive a credit up to the first 150 along and abutting the "long side" of MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul, That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Benanav �akey ✓Lso s t rom Coleman� ��5�� �arris xantry vReiter �ttar�cuFn JUL 3 1999 Adopted by Council: Date ��{q� Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary tp In Favor By � � — i c 0 Against l V�-�D Serv� Mayor 5 � tf�1Nf'r � � -� ������ works sldewalRs f PE�pN dPf1ONE Yf�[- �66'6087 ON COUNpL AOEImA 6Y (UA'1� � � t��'f}N l'�UL.�` Z$ti i;� OFSRi1M7UflEPAOES __ construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 5& 6(See attadied list) � � �E; �-z�1 q �!)FPAWfA/ENT pflECfOR � GiV ATfpiNEV O �f qRECiOR � iMYOR (ORAS54SfANT) _ (CLIFALI.IACATIOl/SFORSqi7ATUXE� � � ASSOC�/iE NO. LIE�9�4—� INRIAt/DATE ❑ GfTV COUNCIL ❑CftvQIIiK ❑ RN. S MGT, SEFNICES DIR Q ca,r�a, aesear�n PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TXE FOLLOW WG QUESTIONS: 1. HastlusPe'soN6rtneverwockeduMera�forCdsdepaM�etK? YES NO 2. Has tlds persaJRrm everbeen a ciy ertpbyee? YES P10 3. Does Lus persoNfirtn possess a sidll not nwmaily possessed by arry curtent ciry employee? YES MO E7�iafn all yes answers on aeperaro sheat mM stlaeh to 9reen sheet The pr��em'defecrive sidewalk" was caused by mul�p{e probtems, hee roots, poor subgrade materiais, freezeRhaw cycles, service life Gmits, chemical addiGves, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncortected, the sidewalk �ition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls arxi possible �itigations. The community will benefit from this project because ic will provide sate defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewatk corrtracts are done by private contractors genera5ng private sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures arni assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recor�struction remains a controversiai issue. This opTwn wauld albw the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGS, resuliting in the expeadRure of 4acgec dollar amouMs in repairs as�d rep�acemeM, as weil as cfaim payouts. Ci0U�1CJ� R9SE3fC�1 �i8f�#$f MAY 2 � 1��9 soutu� 99-M A� r�a yy � o�v,00u � s � c, cra 9g a 50,000 NO