The URL can be used to link to this page

99-414CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGlNAL COUNCIL FTLE N0. C Iq �� By � � � File No. EE BE O� Voting Ward 4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - WARD 7 599075 - 599076- S99077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. ��5� a4 NlAY 2� 1999 Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Bear Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margazet St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. S99078- Both sides E. Sia�th St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. q9 -y�y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION 12ATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 10Q% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MIJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no aiternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of June. 1999 at 5:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paui. That notice of said public heazing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey Bostrom -, 14`p �c,.�� Coleman - 'P;y sc ,,,�- Harris — Abs�., '� In Favor �anhy �Reiter �Against 3 Rbs�r Adoptedby CouncIl: Date_�` V `��{� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Pll6t1S�En BY-1 � ,� . �c 1 C�Ds� K ��/7r�� } �iy�� i � , : i 8 '•�r Mayor � UL �(N�6 �: JUNf� �3 99 �E 5-,3 9� c�q� '� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNdL DA INIiIATED � � PublicWorksSidewalks ,�-ss GREEN SHEET wo. 0�061 iNmnwn iNmnwn� ACTPERSON8PHONE ertyTvedt-266-6087 p�GN ��A��N��R �GmCAUNCIL USTBEONCWNGIAGENDABY(OA'!� (� ROUTING� � �C�C�K . ' - ORDEFi ��'��R ❑FlN.&MGT.SERVICES�IR G� 8 � �Z3 ❑�+nror+(a+nssisraHr� Q Council Research ALiOF51GNAiUREPAGES _ (Cl1PALLLOCATIONSFpR51GNANR� ulSSpC1ATE DEP�TMENTALACCIXINTANT CTONRE�UESTED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8� 7(See attached list) F► 5 - RECOMMENDAnONS: npprove (A) or Rejea (Fi) pEq50NAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: PIANNiNG GOMMISSION _�� SERHGE COMMISSKKJ 1, tias ihis person/Frtn ever worked untler a contrac[ for this department? _ YES NO A — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a cdy emplqree? —5rnc� _ YES NO DISrn�CiGOUNdL 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? — — YES NO uPPOais w�t�cH cotrtaq�os.iEC7ivE? Hcplain ali yes answers on separate sheet and adaeh to green aheet �� INfT1ATINGPqOBLEM,1 UE,O PTUNITY�WHO,WHAT,WHEN,WHERE,WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roois, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperalure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik crondition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefR from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for Rs citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAC�ES IF APPRO�ED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City sutrsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstrudion remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrasVUCture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuRing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �r�i^a�� :�.;3U'Cs; v�;:.3t" �� C� ERn �t�', i i� E�� OTAL AMOUNT Of TRANSACTION $ � j�� j j � J2 COST/fiEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630�000 ACITYIiYNUMBER C99-2T752- 78400 00 FlNANCIPLINFORMATiON:(EXPIAIN) a� A5T = 357,000 . C, t►B 99 s 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGlNAL COUNCIL FTLE N0. C Iq �� By � � � File No. EE BE O� Voting Ward 4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - WARD 7 599075 - 599076- S99077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. ��5� a4 NlAY 2� 1999 Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Bear Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margazet St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. S99078- Both sides E. Sia�th St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. q9 -y�y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION 12ATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 10Q% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MIJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no aiternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of June. 1999 at 5:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paui. That notice of said public heazing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey Bostrom -, 14`p �c,.�� Coleman - 'P;y sc ,,,�- Harris — Abs�., '� In Favor �anhy �Reiter �Against 3 Rbs�r Adoptedby CouncIl: Date_�` V `��{� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Pll6t1S�En BY-1 � ,� . �c 1 C�Ds� K ��/7r�� } �iy�� i � , : i 8 '•�r Mayor � UL �(N�6 �: JUNf� �3 99 �E 5-,3 9� c�q� '� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNdL DA INIiIATED � � PublicWorksSidewalks ,�-ss GREEN SHEET wo. 0�061 iNmnwn iNmnwn� ACTPERSON8PHONE ertyTvedt-266-6087 p�GN ��A��N��R �GmCAUNCIL USTBEONCWNGIAGENDABY(OA'!� (� ROUTING� � �C�C�K . ' - ORDEFi ��'��R ❑FlN.&MGT.SERVICES�IR G� 8 � �Z3 ❑�+nror+(a+nssisraHr� Q Council Research ALiOF51GNAiUREPAGES _ (Cl1PALLLOCATIONSFpR51GNANR� ulSSpC1ATE DEP�TMENTALACCIXINTANT CTONRE�UESTED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8� 7(See attached list) F► 5 - RECOMMENDAnONS: npprove (A) or Rejea (Fi) pEq50NAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: PIANNiNG GOMMISSION _�� SERHGE COMMISSKKJ 1, tias ihis person/Frtn ever worked untler a contrac[ for this department? _ YES NO A — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a cdy emplqree? —5rnc� _ YES NO DISrn�CiGOUNdL 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? — — YES NO uPPOais w�t�cH cotrtaq�os.iEC7ivE? Hcplain ali yes answers on separate sheet and adaeh to green aheet �� INfT1ATINGPqOBLEM,1 UE,O PTUNITY�WHO,WHAT,WHEN,WHERE,WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roois, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperalure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik crondition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefR from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for Rs citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAC�ES IF APPRO�ED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City sutrsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstrudion remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrasVUCture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuRing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �r�i^a�� :�.;3U'Cs; v�;:.3t" �� C� ERn �t�', i i� E�� OTAL AMOUNT Of TRANSACTION $ � j�� j j � J2 COST/fiEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630�000 ACITYIiYNUMBER C99-2T752- 78400 00 FlNANCIPLINFORMATiON:(EXPIAIN) a� A5T = 357,000 . C, t►B 99 s 50,000 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGlNAL COUNCIL FTLE N0. C Iq �� By � � � File No. EE BE O� Voting Ward 4,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 4 S99074 - WARD 7 599075 - 599076- S99077- West side N. Prior Ave. from Pennock Ave. to Hewitt Ave. at 755 N. Prior Ave. only. ��5� a4 NlAY 2� 1999 Both sides E. Fifth St. from Germain St. to N. White Bear Ave. and East side Flandrau St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. Both sides Flandrau St. from E. Fifth St. to Margazet St. Both sides Kennard St. from E. Fourth St. to E. Fifth St. S99078- Both sides E. Sia�th St. from Flandrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. q9 -y�y *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION 12ATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 10Q% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MIJLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no aiternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of June. 1999 at 5:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paui. That notice of said public heazing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey Bostrom -, 14`p �c,.�� Coleman - 'P;y sc ,,,�- Harris — Abs�., '� In Favor �anhy �Reiter �Against 3 Rbs�r Adoptedby CouncIl: Date_�` V `��{� Certified Passed by Council Secretary Pll6t1S�En BY-1 � ,� . �c 1 C�Ds� K ��/7r�� } �iy�� i � , : i 8 '•�r Mayor � UL �(N�6 �: JUNf� �3 99 �E 5-,3 9� c�q� '� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNdL DA INIiIATED � � PublicWorksSidewalks ,�-ss GREEN SHEET wo. 0�061 iNmnwn iNmnwn� ACTPERSON8PHONE ertyTvedt-266-6087 p�GN ��A��N��R �GmCAUNCIL USTBEONCWNGIAGENDABY(OA'!� (� ROUTING� � �C�C�K . ' - ORDEFi ��'��R ❑FlN.&MGT.SERVICES�IR G� 8 � �Z3 ❑�+nror+(a+nssisraHr� Q Council Research ALiOF51GNAiUREPAGES _ (Cl1PALLLOCATIONSFpR51GNANR� ulSSpC1ATE DEP�TMENTALACCIXINTANT CTONRE�UESTED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 4 8� 7(See attached list) F► 5 - RECOMMENDAnONS: npprove (A) or Rejea (Fi) pEq50NAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: PIANNiNG GOMMISSION _�� SERHGE COMMISSKKJ 1, tias ihis person/Frtn ever worked untler a contrac[ for this department? _ YES NO A — 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a cdy emplqree? —5rnc� _ YES NO DISrn�CiGOUNdL 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not normaly possessed by any curtent ciry employee? — — YES NO uPPOais w�t�cH cotrtaq�os.iEC7ivE? Hcplain ali yes answers on separate sheet and adaeh to green aheet �� INfT1ATINGPqOBLEM,1 UE,O PTUNITY�WHO,WHAT,WHEN,WHERE,WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roois, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperalure variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik crondition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefR from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for Rs citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVANTAC�ES IF APPRO�ED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City sutrsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstrudion remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrasVUCture of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resuRing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. �r�i^a�� :�.;3U'Cs; v�;:.3t" �� C� ERn �t�', i i� E�� OTAL AMOUNT Of TRANSACTION $ � j�� j j � J2 COST/fiEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 99-M-0669 A, PIA 99 = 630�000 ACITYIiYNUMBER C99-2T752- 78400 00 FlNANCIPLINFORMATiON:(EXPIAIN) a� A5T = 357,000 . C, t►B 99 s 50,000