The URL can be used to link to this page

99-348„ CITY OF ST. PAUL 0 R I G I NA L COUNCIL FILE N0. \`” 3 PRELIMINARY ORDER BY �7 Fil No. -S 9 8 Vot ng Wax 1,2,3 /}ND/OR e0N�R6'�TIOF[ In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 599017 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99018 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599019 - East side Mackubin Street from Thomas Avenue to. Lafond Avenue. Ward 2 599020 - Both sides Oak Grove Place from St. Clair Avenue to Osceola Avenue. Ward 3 599021 - North side Fairmount Avenue from South Lexington Parkway to West thru 1121 Fairmount Avenue. 599022 - East side South Lexington Parkway from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 599023 - East side South Snelling Avenue from Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. S99024 - West side South Snelling Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue & North side Niles Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to Macalester Street. 599025 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Berkeley Avenue. Ward 6 S99026 - Both sides Frank Street from East Magnolia Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue. S99027 - Both sides Greenbrier Street from East Maryland Avenue to East Hawthorne Avenue. 599028 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Frank Street to Duluth Street. i � � .: i: gq-3�b' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26th dav o£ Mav 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ^�Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �o l eman ✓-�arris �antry �iter �ll .� �-:• � -,� � + , Adopted by Council: Date f.J,. ' 1,:11 1`(�q �"�`�= Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�_ �� „��,��,_,� Q Against �� R� j 7 /�� Mayor � uv w � I�1� ublic Works Sidewalks JNiACT PERSON & PHONE =rry Tvedt - 266-6087 UST BE ON COUNCILAGENDA I P��Ic r�(�rRIN� n� ! OF SIGNANflE PAGES (COP ALL LOCATIONS FOF SIGNANH� � � ASSOCIATE Reconstruct R Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3& 6(See attached list) � COUNqL 3. Does ihis person/firtn possew a skill no[ normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet RTATINGPROBLEM,ISSUE'OFOORTUNRV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls a�f possible 4itigations. APPFOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPPOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as cl�'uu��+��,auis,�,,,,,.�, � �^:,� �: �!r_...,.�.C'�., .�`�f �� c� �� GREEN � �EPAflTAEM DIRECTOR N NBEqFON I�CRYATTOHNEY (DATE) I� �1 �1> OpD pG I�BUDGETDIREC�OR �-� Il . �Y�� MAVOR (OR ASSI5TMfT) ��' 3 f�8� NO. O�n�� ❑ CtTY C�UNCII ❑ cm c�K ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES OIR. 0 Council Research V � � � or Rejecl(R) PERSONAL SFAVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _GVILSERVICECOMMISS�ON 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacont2clforthisdepartrnent? YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee2 YES NO fOTAL AMOUN7 OF TRANSAC710N $ 53 .967 , 36 COSVREVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIBCLE ONE) YES � No FUNDINGSOURCE 99-M-o669 A, PIA 99 � 630 ��0 pCINffYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) 6 � {SST = 351 ,000 C• C18 99 s S��Q� „ CITY OF ST. PAUL 0 R I G I NA L COUNCIL FILE N0. \`” 3 PRELIMINARY ORDER BY �7 Fil No. -S 9 8 Vot ng Wax 1,2,3 /}ND/OR e0N�R6'�TIOF[ In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 599017 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99018 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599019 - East side Mackubin Street from Thomas Avenue to. Lafond Avenue. Ward 2 599020 - Both sides Oak Grove Place from St. Clair Avenue to Osceola Avenue. Ward 3 599021 - North side Fairmount Avenue from South Lexington Parkway to West thru 1121 Fairmount Avenue. 599022 - East side South Lexington Parkway from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 599023 - East side South Snelling Avenue from Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. S99024 - West side South Snelling Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue & North side Niles Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to Macalester Street. 599025 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Berkeley Avenue. Ward 6 S99026 - Both sides Frank Street from East Magnolia Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue. S99027 - Both sides Greenbrier Street from East Maryland Avenue to East Hawthorne Avenue. 599028 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Frank Street to Duluth Street. i � � .: i: gq-3�b' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26th dav o£ Mav 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ^�Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �o l eman ✓-�arris �antry �iter �ll .� �-:• � -,� � + , Adopted by Council: Date f.J,. ' 1,:11 1`(�q �"�`�= Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�_ �� „��,��,_,� Q Against �� R� j 7 /�� Mayor � uv w � I�1� ublic Works Sidewalks JNiACT PERSON & PHONE =rry Tvedt - 266-6087 UST BE ON COUNCILAGENDA I P��Ic r�(�rRIN� n� ! OF SIGNANflE PAGES (COP ALL LOCATIONS FOF SIGNANH� � � ASSOCIATE Reconstruct R Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3& 6(See attached list) � COUNqL 3. Does ihis person/firtn possew a skill no[ normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet RTATINGPROBLEM,ISSUE'OFOORTUNRV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls a�f possible 4itigations. APPFOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPPOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as cl�'uu��+��,auis,�,,,,,.�, � �^:,� �: �!r_...,.�.C'�., .�`�f �� c� �� GREEN � �EPAflTAEM DIRECTOR N NBEqFON I�CRYATTOHNEY (DATE) I� �1 �1> OpD pG I�BUDGETDIREC�OR �-� Il . �Y�� MAVOR (OR ASSI5TMfT) ��' 3 f�8� NO. O�n�� ❑ CtTY C�UNCII ❑ cm c�K ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES OIR. 0 Council Research V � � � or Rejecl(R) PERSONAL SFAVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _GVILSERVICECOMMISS�ON 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacont2clforthisdepartrnent? YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee2 YES NO fOTAL AMOUN7 OF TRANSAC710N $ 53 .967 , 36 COSVREVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIBCLE ONE) YES � No FUNDINGSOURCE 99-M-o669 A, PIA 99 � 630 ��0 pCINffYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) 6 � {SST = 351 ,000 C• C18 99 s S��Q� „ CITY OF ST. PAUL 0 R I G I NA L COUNCIL FILE N0. \`” 3 PRELIMINARY ORDER BY �7 Fil No. -S 9 8 Vot ng Wax 1,2,3 /}ND/OR e0N�R6'�TIOF[ In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: Ward 1 599017 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Edmund Avenue to Thomas Avenue. S99018 - Both sides Mackubin Street from Lafond Avenue to Blair Avenue. 599019 - East side Mackubin Street from Thomas Avenue to. Lafond Avenue. Ward 2 599020 - Both sides Oak Grove Place from St. Clair Avenue to Osceola Avenue. Ward 3 599021 - North side Fairmount Avenue from South Lexington Parkway to West thru 1121 Fairmount Avenue. 599022 - East side South Lexington Parkway from Osceola Avenue to Fairmount Avenue. 599023 - East side South Snelling Avenue from Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. S99024 - West side South Snelling Avenue from Hartford Avenue to Juno Avenue & North side Niles Avenue from South Snelling Avenue to Macalester Street. 599025 - Both sides South Wheeler Street from St. Clair Avenue to Berkeley Avenue. Ward 6 S99026 - Both sides Frank Street from East Magnolia Avenue to East Jessamine Avenue. S99027 - Both sides Greenbrier Street from East Maryland Avenue to East Hawthorne Avenue. 599028 - Both sides East Jessamine Avenue from Frank Street to Duluth Street. i � � .: i: gq-3�b' *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) - 58.65 per front foot for a £ive (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 26th dav o£ Mav 1999 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ^�Benanav ✓Blakey �ostrom �o l eman ✓-�arris �antry �iter �ll .� �-:• � -,� � + , Adopted by Council: Date f.J,. ' 1,:11 1`(�q �"�`�= Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�_ �� „��,��,_,� Q Against �� R� j 7 /�� Mayor � uv w � I�1� ublic Works Sidewalks JNiACT PERSON & PHONE =rry Tvedt - 266-6087 UST BE ON COUNCILAGENDA I P��Ic r�(�rRIN� n� ! OF SIGNANflE PAGES (COP ALL LOCATIONS FOF SIGNANH� � � ASSOCIATE Reconstruct R Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3& 6(See attached list) � COUNqL 3. Does ihis person/firtn possew a skill no[ normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet RTATINGPROBLEM,ISSUE'OFOORTUNRV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHn: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeze/thaw cycies, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls a�f possible 4itigations. APPFOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPPOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as weli as cl�'uu��+��,auis,�,,,,,.�, � �^:,� �: �!r_...,.�.C'�., .�`�f �� c� �� GREEN � �EPAflTAEM DIRECTOR N NBEqFON I�CRYATTOHNEY (DATE) I� �1 �1> OpD pG I�BUDGETDIREC�OR �-� Il . �Y�� MAVOR (OR ASSI5TMfT) ��' 3 f�8� NO. O�n�� ❑ CtTY C�UNCII ❑ cm c�K ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES OIR. 0 Council Research V � � � or Rejecl(R) PERSONAL SFAVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _GVILSERVICECOMMISS�ON 7, HasthispersoNfirtneverworkedunderacont2clforthisdepartrnent? YES NO — 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee2 YES NO fOTAL AMOUN7 OF TRANSAC710N $ 53 .967 , 36 COSVREVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIBCLE ONE) YES � No FUNDINGSOURCE 99-M-o669 A, PIA 99 � 630 ��0 pCINffYNUMBER C99-2T752-078400000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) 6 � {SST = 351 ,000 C• C18 99 s S��Q�