The URL can be used to link to this page

99-160, �� CITY OF 5T. PAIJL �lIRI{S42tt COUNC L FILE N0. `q � �`O PRELIMZNARY ORDER MAR 13 7999 BY ��`� File No. EE BELOW Voting Ward�6 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599�03 - East side Duluth St from E_ Hawthorne Ave_ to E_ Orange Ave. 599004 - Both sides Frank St. from E. Hyacinth Ave. to E. Ivy Ave. 599005 - Both sides E. Hawthorne Ave. £rom Frank St. to Duluth St. 599006 - North side E. Orange Ave. from Erank St. to E. FIyacinth Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per Pront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 fset of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. aa MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structuresJ, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council oP the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: F� 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimeted cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE Por estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14 dav of April, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ;/�ostrom as �,.�' —Coleman F3arris ,/Lantry �P G Sn Favor O Against � ��sew� Adopted by Council: Date_��Y°t � Certified Passed by Council Secretary ___ � ��., Yn�n nyiii iv� i»> nn c� 7� �(�/� DEPAqTMEM/OFFICFi�OUNCiI ATEINRWTED � ' �`+�(J Public Works Sidewalks �2-sase GREEN SHEET No. 38�1�5 ACTPERSONBPMONE wR��A� INIitAVDATE �DEPAR'iMENTqREGTOR ❑CRYCAUNGI erty Tvedt - 2666087 NUMB FOR I�� ATTO�� ❑��K U5TBEONCOUNqLAGENDABY( .ML35C flOUiiNG �g�p«dpEC{pp ❑�li.&AIGT.5EAYICESDIR uncil Research office � � 0 Y Mnvon tora nssissu�s7 Q Counal Research 4LtOF$IGpANREPAGE$ 1 _ ICLIPALLLOCA710NSFORSGNRNR� � ASSOCIAiE U DEPApTAENfALACCOUNTANT CTONREDUESfED Recwnstrud Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached tist) i'i� �� W7 � WMMENDAT10N5: Appo�e (A) or Re�eq (R) pFRgONAL SERYlCE CONLR0.CTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTlON5: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _��NCECOMMIS$ION �. �y��,.orkeduMeracontractforltisdepaMient? a6 �� YES NO A�� 2 Has ttiis persaNfrtn everbeen a aty empbyce? — YES NO dsrflicr courlp� 3. Does Uiis persoNfirtn pmsess a skill not rrortnsM D�essetl by arry curterrt tlty err�loYee? — YES NO PPORis Nm�cN cOUNC�I o8JEC7rvE4 �xpfain all yes answars on seParate sheet antl attach to green sheet INRIATNG PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, O�ORTUNRY (NMO, WFIAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem 'defective sidewalk' was created berause of hee roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freefthaw cycles, service life limfts, chemical addi6ves, eMreme temperaWre variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and cortec[ed on an a�nual basis. left uncortected, the sidewalk �ndition would worsen to a state where ft would be tendered unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from taNs and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benetit from Mis project berause ft will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISqDVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construdion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains controvers+al. OI�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROYEO: This option would affow the infrasVucture of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGs, ultimatey resuRing in the expendkure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as daim payouts. Cound! Resea?ch Genter �EB Q 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 9, B4 ], � E COSTfREYENUE BUDGETEU (CIRCLE ON� YES w0 Fur+owcsouRCe 98-M-0668 A, PPA 98 < 6S8,0o0 pqTy(ryNUMBEq �gs-2T751-0784-00000 FlNrwaw.iNFOne.una,:�rwn) B, AST � 32S,OOD C. C16 98 = 50,000 , �� CITY OF 5T. PAIJL �lIRI{S42tt COUNC L FILE N0. `q � �`O PRELIMZNARY ORDER MAR 13 7999 BY ��`� File No. EE BELOW Voting Ward�6 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599�03 - East side Duluth St from E_ Hawthorne Ave_ to E_ Orange Ave. 599004 - Both sides Frank St. from E. Hyacinth Ave. to E. Ivy Ave. 599005 - Both sides E. Hawthorne Ave. £rom Frank St. to Duluth St. 599006 - North side E. Orange Ave. from Erank St. to E. FIyacinth Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per Pront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 fset of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. aa MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structuresJ, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council oP the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: F� 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimeted cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE Por estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14 dav of April, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ;/�ostrom as �,.�' —Coleman F3arris ,/Lantry �P G Sn Favor O Against � ��sew� Adopted by Council: Date_��Y°t � Certified Passed by Council Secretary ___ � ��., Yn�n nyiii iv� i»> nn c� 7� �(�/� DEPAqTMEM/OFFICFi�OUNCiI ATEINRWTED � ' �`+�(J Public Works Sidewalks �2-sase GREEN SHEET No. 38�1�5 ACTPERSONBPMONE wR��A� INIitAVDATE �DEPAR'iMENTqREGTOR ❑CRYCAUNGI erty Tvedt - 2666087 NUMB FOR I�� ATTO�� ❑��K U5TBEONCOUNqLAGENDABY( .ML35C flOUiiNG �g�p«dpEC{pp ❑�li.&AIGT.5EAYICESDIR uncil Research office � � 0 Y Mnvon tora nssissu�s7 Q Counal Research 4LtOF$IGpANREPAGE$ 1 _ ICLIPALLLOCA710NSFORSGNRNR� � ASSOCIAiE U DEPApTAENfALACCOUNTANT CTONREDUESfED Recwnstrud Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached tist) i'i� �� W7 � WMMENDAT10N5: Appo�e (A) or Re�eq (R) pFRgONAL SERYlCE CONLR0.CTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTlON5: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _��NCECOMMIS$ION �. �y��,.orkeduMeracontractforltisdepaMient? a6 �� YES NO A�� 2 Has ttiis persaNfrtn everbeen a aty empbyce? — YES NO dsrflicr courlp� 3. Does Uiis persoNfirtn pmsess a skill not rrortnsM D�essetl by arry curterrt tlty err�loYee? — YES NO PPORis Nm�cN cOUNC�I o8JEC7rvE4 �xpfain all yes answars on seParate sheet antl attach to green sheet INRIATNG PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, O�ORTUNRY (NMO, WFIAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem 'defective sidewalk' was created berause of hee roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freefthaw cycles, service life limfts, chemical addi6ves, eMreme temperaWre variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and cortec[ed on an a�nual basis. left uncortected, the sidewalk �ndition would worsen to a state where ft would be tendered unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from taNs and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benetit from Mis project berause ft will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISqDVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construdion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains controvers+al. OI�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROYEO: This option would affow the infrasVucture of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGs, ultimatey resuRing in the expendkure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as daim payouts. Cound! Resea?ch Genter �EB Q 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 9, B4 ], � E COSTfREYENUE BUDGETEU (CIRCLE ON� YES w0 Fur+owcsouRCe 98-M-0668 A, PPA 98 < 6S8,0o0 pqTy(ryNUMBEq �gs-2T751-0784-00000 FlNrwaw.iNFOne.una,:�rwn) B, AST � 32S,OOD C. C16 98 = 50,000 , �� CITY OF 5T. PAIJL �lIRI{S42tt COUNC L FILE N0. `q � �`O PRELIMZNARY ORDER MAR 13 7999 BY ��`� File No. EE BELOW Voting Ward�6 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 599�03 - East side Duluth St from E_ Hawthorne Ave_ to E_ Orange Ave. 599004 - Both sides Frank St. from E. Hyacinth Ave. to E. Ivy Ave. 599005 - Both sides E. Hawthorne Ave. £rom Frank St. to Duluth St. 599006 - North side E. Orange Ave. from Erank St. to E. FIyacinth Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per Pront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% o£ the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 fset of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. aa MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structuresJ, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council oP the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: F� 2. 3. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimeted cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE Por estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14 dav of April, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ;/�ostrom as �,.�' —Coleman F3arris ,/Lantry �P G Sn Favor O Against � ��sew� Adopted by Council: Date_��Y°t � Certified Passed by Council Secretary ___ � ��., Yn�n nyiii iv� i»> nn c� 7� �(�/� DEPAqTMEM/OFFICFi�OUNCiI ATEINRWTED � ' �`+�(J Public Works Sidewalks �2-sase GREEN SHEET No. 38�1�5 ACTPERSONBPMONE wR��A� INIitAVDATE �DEPAR'iMENTqREGTOR ❑CRYCAUNGI erty Tvedt - 2666087 NUMB FOR I�� ATTO�� ❑��K U5TBEONCOUNqLAGENDABY( .ML35C flOUiiNG �g�p«dpEC{pp ❑�li.&AIGT.5EAYICESDIR uncil Research office � � 0 Y Mnvon tora nssissu�s7 Q Counal Research 4LtOF$IGpANREPAGE$ 1 _ ICLIPALLLOCA710NSFORSGNRNR� � ASSOCIAiE U DEPApTAENfALACCOUNTANT CTONREDUESfED Recwnstrud Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached tist) i'i� �� W7 � WMMENDAT10N5: Appo�e (A) or Re�eq (R) pFRgONAL SERYlCE CONLR0.CTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTlON5: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _��NCECOMMIS$ION �. �y��,.orkeduMeracontractforltisdepaMient? a6 �� YES NO A�� 2 Has ttiis persaNfrtn everbeen a aty empbyce? — YES NO dsrflicr courlp� 3. Does Uiis persoNfirtn pmsess a skill not rrortnsM D�essetl by arry curterrt tlty err�loYee? — YES NO PPORis Nm�cN cOUNC�I o8JEC7rvE4 �xpfain all yes answars on seParate sheet antl attach to green sheet INRIATNG PFiOBLEM, ISSUE, O�ORTUNRY (NMO, WFIAT. WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem 'defective sidewalk' was created berause of hee roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freefthaw cycles, service life limfts, chemical addi6ves, eMreme temperaWre variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and cortec[ed on an a�nual basis. left uncortected, the sidewalk �ndition would worsen to a state where ft would be tendered unusable and subject to increased pedesVian injuries from taNs and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benetit from Mis project berause ft will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISqDVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construdion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains controvers+al. OI�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROYEO: This option would affow the infrasVucture of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suiGs, ultimatey resuRing in the expendkure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as daim payouts. Cound! Resea?ch Genter �EB Q 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 9, B4 ], � E COSTfREYENUE BUDGETEU (CIRCLE ON� YES w0 Fur+owcsouRCe 98-M-0668 A, PPA 98 < 6S8,0o0 pqTy(ryNUMBEq �gs-2T751-0784-00000 FlNrwaw.iNFOne.una,:�rwn) B, AST � 32S,OOD C. C16 98 = 50,000