The URL can be used to link to this page

99-159LL CITY OF ST. PAUL p11p1 CO L I�ILE . ��S� O�� 0 PRELIMINARY ORDER MAR 131999 gy ��=Z Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 Zn the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599001 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement oP old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) Poot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oP the property. MC7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City oE Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14'�' dav of Abril, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice oP said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav �/�Blakey �tsostrom (a}�5e,��-- C�leman ✓�iarris i/�antry t/I�eiter Adopted by Council: Date �� `�q� t Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �. .��,.-._� �jAgainst � � l �� Mayor Pnblic Hearin Date - A ril 14 1999 RE 2-5-99 9 g_� 5'Q PEPARIMENTfOFFlCFJCWNdL ASE INR7ATED J PublicWorksSidewalks ,2-ao-sa GREEN SHEET No. 3��7-tt INIiIAUDATE INfT1AUDAiE ACT PERSON 8 PIpNE erryTvedt-26Cr6087 r.r+ ��MEMaa�cro� ❑�y��i� U5f8EONCOUNpLAGENDABY(DAT� Z��L�F�9J RO ��A��Y ❑GTMGLEAK Must be in Council Research by �a+ ��E`p`��OF' OFl"_�`w�'s�v'°�s°'�. 2-12-99. �"'^YOa�°R^s�sT^err� � Coundi Research ALtOFS�G�Nn'NREPAGR ], _(CUPALLtACAT10NSPoR5IGNANR� u 0.SSOCIATE u DEPARTA¢HTALACCWNfAM N REOUESiED Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3 (Sea attached list) �� MMENDATIONS: Approva (A) o� RajBp (R) pEqgpryq� SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISS�ON _pNL SERVICE LOMMISSION 1. Hd5 �1ti5 PBf50NfiR11 CVef Wolked undet 8 COn6aCt fOf �IIiS E8p3Nn2M? _aeWtuAtTTFE �S NO — 2 Has this Persor✓fRn evef been a dry er�Ioyee? A N� — YES NO _qnpi�i �pur�G� 3. Does ihis persoMrtn possess a s1o71 not normatiy pos�sed by any wrten[ ary empbyee? SWHICNCqUNaLOBJEGTVE? YES NO EYpfatn all yes arowera on sepatate aheat arM atleeh to gfeBn slceet fNR1ATING PflOHLEM, ISSUE, OPPOHIUN(iV (WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The probiem °defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating free(thaw cyctes, service I'rfe limits, chemiral addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur ort a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unc:orcected, the sidewalk conditbn woukl worsen to a state where R would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibte {itigations. ADVMf�AGES IFAPPROVEU; The community will benefR from ihis project because it will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resutt of this activity. DISA�VANfAGES IF APPROVED: Historica{1y, the sidewaik recor�structions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, d still remains controversiat. DISADVANTA6ES IF NOTAPpApVED: This option would albw the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimatety resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payeuts. CcUl� R@SS�FGh G'8;1i2C � FEB 0 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ) b � 945. 00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO FlINDINGSOURCE 48-M-0668 A. PIA 98 � 6�8��0 qCRVfTYNUMBER C9�"ZT�S��OZB� FlNANCIALINFORMATiON:(IXPtAINy B� AST ' � 325 �QOO _ - C, Ct8 98 = 50,000 LL CITY OF ST. PAUL p11p1 CO L I�ILE . ��S� O�� 0 PRELIMINARY ORDER MAR 131999 gy ��=Z Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 Zn the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599001 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement oP old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) Poot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oP the property. MC7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City oE Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14'�' dav of Abril, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice oP said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav �/�Blakey �tsostrom (a}�5e,��-- C�leman ✓�iarris i/�antry t/I�eiter Adopted by Council: Date �� `�q� t Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �. .��,.-._� �jAgainst � � l �� Mayor Pnblic Hearin Date - A ril 14 1999 RE 2-5-99 9 g_� 5'Q PEPARIMENTfOFFlCFJCWNdL ASE INR7ATED J PublicWorksSidewalks ,2-ao-sa GREEN SHEET No. 3��7-tt INIiIAUDATE INfT1AUDAiE ACT PERSON 8 PIpNE erryTvedt-26Cr6087 r.r+ ��MEMaa�cro� ❑�y��i� U5f8EONCOUNpLAGENDABY(DAT� Z��L�F�9J RO ��A��Y ❑GTMGLEAK Must be in Council Research by �a+ ��E`p`��OF' OFl"_�`w�'s�v'°�s°'�. 2-12-99. �"'^YOa�°R^s�sT^err� � Coundi Research ALtOFS�G�Nn'NREPAGR ], _(CUPALLtACAT10NSPoR5IGNANR� u 0.SSOCIATE u DEPARTA¢HTALACCWNfAM N REOUESiED Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3 (Sea attached list) �� MMENDATIONS: Approva (A) o� RajBp (R) pEqgpryq� SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISS�ON _pNL SERVICE LOMMISSION 1. Hd5 �1ti5 PBf50NfiR11 CVef Wolked undet 8 COn6aCt fOf �IIiS E8p3Nn2M? _aeWtuAtTTFE �S NO — 2 Has this Persor✓fRn evef been a dry er�Ioyee? A N� — YES NO _qnpi�i �pur�G� 3. Does ihis persoMrtn possess a s1o71 not normatiy pos�sed by any wrten[ ary empbyee? SWHICNCqUNaLOBJEGTVE? YES NO EYpfatn all yes arowera on sepatate aheat arM atleeh to gfeBn slceet fNR1ATING PflOHLEM, ISSUE, OPPOHIUN(iV (WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The probiem °defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating free(thaw cyctes, service I'rfe limits, chemiral addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur ort a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unc:orcected, the sidewalk conditbn woukl worsen to a state where R would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibte {itigations. ADVMf�AGES IFAPPROVEU; The community will benefR from ihis project because it will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resutt of this activity. DISA�VANfAGES IF APPROVED: Historica{1y, the sidewaik recor�structions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, d still remains controversiat. DISADVANTA6ES IF NOTAPpApVED: This option would albw the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimatety resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payeuts. CcUl� R@SS�FGh G'8;1i2C � FEB 0 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ) b � 945. 00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO FlINDINGSOURCE 48-M-0668 A. PIA 98 � 6�8��0 qCRVfTYNUMBER C9�"ZT�S��OZB� FlNANCIALINFORMATiON:(IXPtAINy B� AST ' � 325 �QOO _ - C, Ct8 98 = 50,000 LL CITY OF ST. PAUL p11p1 CO L I�ILE . ��S� O�� 0 PRELIMINARY ORDER MAR 131999 gy ��=Z Fil No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward 3 Zn the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations: 599001 - Both sides South Albert St. from Stanford Ave to Berkeley Ave. 599002 - North side Palace Ave from South Saratoga St. to South Pascal St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement oP old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) Poot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100g of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" oP the property. MC7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council of the City oE Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 � � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14'�' dav of Abril, 1999 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice oP said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav �/�Blakey �tsostrom (a}�5e,��-- C�leman ✓�iarris i/�antry t/I�eiter Adopted by Council: Date �� `�q� t Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By � �. .��,.-._� �jAgainst � � l �� Mayor Pnblic Hearin Date - A ril 14 1999 RE 2-5-99 9 g_� 5'Q PEPARIMENTfOFFlCFJCWNdL ASE INR7ATED J PublicWorksSidewalks ,2-ao-sa GREEN SHEET No. 3��7-tt INIiIAUDATE INfT1AUDAiE ACT PERSON 8 PIpNE erryTvedt-26Cr6087 r.r+ ��MEMaa�cro� ❑�y��i� U5f8EONCOUNpLAGENDABY(DAT� Z��L�F�9J RO ��A��Y ❑GTMGLEAK Must be in Council Research by �a+ ��E`p`��OF' OFl"_�`w�'s�v'°�s°'�. 2-12-99. �"'^YOa�°R^s�sT^err� � Coundi Research ALtOFS�G�Nn'NREPAGR ], _(CUPALLtACAT10NSPoR5IGNANR� u 0.SSOCIATE u DEPARTA¢HTALACCWNfAM N REOUESiED Construct & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3 (Sea attached list) �� MMENDATIONS: Approva (A) o� RajBp (R) pEqgpryq� SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISS�ON _pNL SERVICE LOMMISSION 1. Hd5 �1ti5 PBf50NfiR11 CVef Wolked undet 8 COn6aCt fOf �IIiS E8p3Nn2M? _aeWtuAtTTFE �S NO — 2 Has this Persor✓fRn evef been a dry er�Ioyee? A N� — YES NO _qnpi�i �pur�G� 3. Does ihis persoMrtn possess a s1o71 not normatiy pos�sed by any wrten[ ary empbyee? SWHICNCqUNaLOBJEGTVE? YES NO EYpfatn all yes arowera on sepatate aheat arM atleeh to gfeBn slceet fNR1ATING PflOHLEM, ISSUE, OPPOHIUN(iV (WMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The probiem °defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating free(thaw cyctes, service I'rfe limits, chemiral addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur ort a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unc:orcected, the sidewalk conditbn woukl worsen to a state where R would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibte {itigations. ADVMf�AGES IFAPPROVEU; The community will benefR from ihis project because it will provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resutt of this activity. DISA�VANfAGES IF APPROVED: Historica{1y, the sidewaik recor�structions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simp{y stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, d still remains controversiat. DISADVANTA6ES IF NOTAPpApVED: This option would albw the iMrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimatety resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounis in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payeuts. CcUl� R@SS�FGh G'8;1i2C � FEB 0 4 19�9 OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ ) b � 945. 00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES NO FlINDINGSOURCE 48-M-0668 A. PIA 98 � 6�8��0 qCRVfTYNUMBER C9�"ZT�S��OZB� FlNANCIALINFORMATiON:(IXPtAINy B� AST ' � 325 �QOO _ - C, Ct8 98 = 50,000