The URL can be used to link to this page

98-642t �� CITY OF ST. PAUL COIINCIL FILE o q s-� � a � PRELIMINARY ORDER B�� O ��! File No. 18744 & 18746 L Voting ward 6 & 3 In the Matter of the Operation and Maintenance costs for the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots from January l, 1999 to December 31, 1999. DI I41 IQU[� Au� 1 �sss The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approve with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $2,700 for Arcade/Case and $9,500 for GrandJSnelling. Both parking lots are financed by assessments. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd dav of September, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provicled by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays fenanav �lakey ✓�ostrom �oleman ; /Harris ,/Lantry �eiter Adopted by the Council: Date_�� V ,�� Certified Passed by the Council Secretary BY � �In Favor Mayor ��Against Public Heaing 09l02l98 � T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 7� 2 �9� Green Sheet Number: 52104 EPARTMENTDIRECTOR COUNCIL ontact Person and Phone Number: IfYATIORNEY CLERK Peter Wtute � 266-$853 UDGEi DIRE(,'fOR I'ECH & MGT SERV DIIi MAYOR(ORASSISTAIVT) 1 OUNCILRFSEARCiI ust be on Council Agenda by: 07/15l98 OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES Z (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) C`TION REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing for the final order for the operation and aintenance cost for the Arcade/Case Parking Lot and the Grand/Snelling Parking Lot from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999. File No. 18744 and 18746 RECOMMENnA7IONS:APPROVE(n)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECONTRACiSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWING: 1. Has the per5on/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO PLANNING COMMISSION A S'IAFF . . Has this per5on/firm evcr been a City employee? YES NO CIVIL SERVICE CONA�IISSION . Does tfiis person/frm possess a skill mt normally possessed by any YES NO CIB CODA�IITTEE current City employee? , Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. UPPORTS WHICI3 COUNCIL OBJECTNE? Neighborhoods COUNCIL WARD(S) (& 3 DISTR[CT PLANNING COUNCIL 5&],4 INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORT[JNITY (Whq Whay When, Where, Why?): hese are public parking lots for business owners who desire to have parking for their cuatomera. Revenue is needed to operate and maintain the lots. DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Parking lot could not be operated os maintained. OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: �' 2�'] Q Q COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES Np Arcade/Case C��;� �v�v�r„! ;d: ,..�� $9,500 Grand/Snelling �UL 0 6 1996 FUNDINGSOU2CE: ASSESSIIIEIICB ACTIVITYNUMBER: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN (Ssn�PSo) t �� CITY OF ST. PAUL COIINCIL FILE o q s-� � a � PRELIMINARY ORDER B�� O ��! File No. 18744 & 18746 L Voting ward 6 & 3 In the Matter of the Operation and Maintenance costs for the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots from January l, 1999 to December 31, 1999. DI I41 IQU[� Au� 1 �sss The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approve with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $2,700 for Arcade/Case and $9,500 for GrandJSnelling. Both parking lots are financed by assessments. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd dav of September, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provicled by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays fenanav �lakey ✓�ostrom �oleman ; /Harris ,/Lantry �eiter Adopted by the Council: Date_�� V ,�� Certified Passed by the Council Secretary BY � �In Favor Mayor ��Against Public Heaing 09l02l98 � T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 7� 2 �9� Green Sheet Number: 52104 EPARTMENTDIRECTOR COUNCIL ontact Person and Phone Number: IfYATIORNEY CLERK Peter Wtute � 266-$853 UDGEi DIRE(,'fOR I'ECH & MGT SERV DIIi MAYOR(ORASSISTAIVT) 1 OUNCILRFSEARCiI ust be on Council Agenda by: 07/15l98 OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES Z (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) C`TION REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing for the final order for the operation and aintenance cost for the Arcade/Case Parking Lot and the Grand/Snelling Parking Lot from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999. File No. 18744 and 18746 RECOMMENnA7IONS:APPROVE(n)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECONTRACiSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWING: 1. Has the per5on/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO PLANNING COMMISSION A S'IAFF . . Has this per5on/firm evcr been a City employee? YES NO CIVIL SERVICE CONA�IISSION . Does tfiis person/frm possess a skill mt normally possessed by any YES NO CIB CODA�IITTEE current City employee? , Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. UPPORTS WHICI3 COUNCIL OBJECTNE? Neighborhoods COUNCIL WARD(S) (& 3 DISTR[CT PLANNING COUNCIL 5&],4 INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORT[JNITY (Whq Whay When, Where, Why?): hese are public parking lots for business owners who desire to have parking for their cuatomera. Revenue is needed to operate and maintain the lots. DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Parking lot could not be operated os maintained. OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: �' 2�'] Q Q COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES Np Arcade/Case C��;� �v�v�r„! ;d: ,..�� $9,500 Grand/Snelling �UL 0 6 1996 FUNDINGSOU2CE: ASSESSIIIEIICB ACTIVITYNUMBER: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN (Ssn�PSo) t �� CITY OF ST. PAUL COIINCIL FILE o q s-� � a � PRELIMINARY ORDER B�� O ��! File No. 18744 & 18746 L Voting ward 6 & 3 In the Matter of the Operation and Maintenance costs for the Arcade/Case and the Grand/Snelling parking lots from January l, 1999 to December 31, 1999. DI I41 IQU[� Au� 1 �sss The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approve with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $2,700 for Arcade/Case and $9,500 for GrandJSnelling. Both parking lots are financed by assessments. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd dav of September, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provicled by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays fenanav �lakey ✓�ostrom �oleman ; /Harris ,/Lantry �eiter Adopted by the Council: Date_�� V ,�� Certified Passed by the Council Secretary BY � �In Favor Mayor ��Against Public Heaing 09l02l98 � T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: 7� 2 �9� Green Sheet Number: 52104 EPARTMENTDIRECTOR COUNCIL ontact Person and Phone Number: IfYATIORNEY CLERK Peter Wtute � 266-$853 UDGEi DIRE(,'fOR I'ECH & MGT SERV DIIi MAYOR(ORASSISTAIVT) 1 OUNCILRFSEARCiI ust be on Council Agenda by: 07/15l98 OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES Z (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) C`TION REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing for the final order for the operation and aintenance cost for the Arcade/Case Parking Lot and the Grand/Snelling Parking Lot from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999. File No. 18744 and 18746 RECOMMENnA7IONS:APPROVE(n)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECONTRACiSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWING: 1. Has the per5on/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO PLANNING COMMISSION A S'IAFF . . Has this per5on/firm evcr been a City employee? YES NO CIVIL SERVICE CONA�IISSION . Does tfiis person/frm possess a skill mt normally possessed by any YES NO CIB CODA�IITTEE current City employee? , Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. UPPORTS WHICI3 COUNCIL OBJECTNE? Neighborhoods COUNCIL WARD(S) (& 3 DISTR[CT PLANNING COUNCIL 5&],4 INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORT[JNITY (Whq Whay When, Where, Why?): hese are public parking lots for business owners who desire to have parking for their cuatomera. Revenue is needed to operate and maintain the lots. DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Same as above. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owners will have assessments payable via property taxes. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Parking lot could not be operated os maintained. OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: �' 2�'] Q Q COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES Np Arcade/Case C��;� �v�v�r„! ;d: ,..�� $9,500 Grand/Snelling �UL 0 6 1996 FUNDINGSOU2CE: ASSESSIIIEIICB ACTIVITYNUMBER: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN (Ssn�PSo)