Loading...
98-439�� CITY OF 5T. PAUI, COUN IL FzLE . 98-Y39 � PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi1e o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St Prom W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave 598083 - North side W Rose Ave £rom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. 3� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Smprovement Aid. Gl That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereoP as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS °as Nays �nanav ✓Blakey �strom �G6leman ,�H�rris �ntry ��`iter PIIR� fCper. -�r i 31ss� JiAi1^�Q.. Adopted by Council: Date ' ` ��� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 2 1n Favor By � CJ Against Mayor Pubiic Works Sidewalks �-�-y� % y.�y GREEN SHEET No. _arry H. Lueth� 2666083 assicn ���E�M�DI,I7ECTOA Numa�rt we AUSTBEONCOUtKILAGENDA6Y{OAT� 5-20-98 Ra� auocEroiascmFt For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTMCf) fOTALt OF SIGNATUHE PAGE8 _ S _(CUP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNANfl� n ASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) b MGT, SERVICES q� - u3� �CN9. SERVICE GOAiFi1SSbN CIB COMMITfEE STAFF YM%�iCW�p.OBJECTNE? PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACfS NUST ANSWER THE FOI.LON7NG QUESTIONS_ 7. Has thisp���t� rtn ever worked undel a contract for this departrnent? EY 5 NO 2. }ias thisper Bver been a dry employee? EY S��NO 3. Dces this persorvfrm possess a skif� not mrmalty possessed by arry cunent ciry employee? YES NQ Eaplain tll yas aruMwn on s+poM� ahaN aM attaMto gnan shwt The problem "defecYrve sidewaik" was created because of Vee mots, defeterious subgrade materiai, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service 1'rfe limBs, chemical add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These proWems ocxur on a citywide level and must be addressed and coriected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condRion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject ro increased pedestrian injuries trom fa4ls and possble litigations. Tha communfty wili benefd from this project because ii wi{I provide safe detect free sidewafks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk caMracts are executed by private coMractors, sp it faliows that private sector pbs are created as a resuR ot this activtty. iF APPROVED: liistorieally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply siated, property owners datest assessmeMs, and despite the tacl up to one-halt ihe assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains corttroversial. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili geoerate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting +n the expenddure of larger dollar amounts in eventua{ repairs andlor replacemerrt, wait'as Eiaim payouts. � �38�8�6Ch. Cr�ntP;� MAY 111998 7TAL AMWNT OFTRAtiSACTIOH S JNDWGSOURCE 98 -ri-o668 OANCIAL WFORMATION: (EXPLAII�ry A� Y[A ytf = 4]tf�A�O B, AST = 325�000 C� Ct8 98 = 50,OOQ COST7AEYENUE BUDGETED (CipCLE ONE) ACTNRY NUMBER L:] � . �� CITY OF 5T. PAUI, COUN IL FzLE . 98-Y39 � PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi1e o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St Prom W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave 598083 - North side W Rose Ave £rom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. 3� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Smprovement Aid. Gl That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereoP as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS °as Nays �nanav ✓Blakey �strom �G6leman ,�H�rris �ntry ��`iter PIIR� fCper. -�r i 31ss� JiAi1^�Q.. Adopted by Council: Date ' ` ��� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 2 1n Favor By � CJ Against Mayor Pubiic Works Sidewalks �-�-y� % y.�y GREEN SHEET No. _arry H. Lueth� 2666083 assicn ���E�M�DI,I7ECTOA Numa�rt we AUSTBEONCOUtKILAGENDA6Y{OAT� 5-20-98 Ra� auocEroiascmFt For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTMCf) fOTALt OF SIGNATUHE PAGE8 _ S _(CUP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNANfl� n ASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) b MGT, SERVICES q� - u3� �CN9. SERVICE GOAiFi1SSbN CIB COMMITfEE STAFF YM%�iCW�p.OBJECTNE? PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACfS NUST ANSWER THE FOI.LON7NG QUESTIONS_ 7. Has thisp���t� rtn ever worked undel a contract for this departrnent? EY 5 NO 2. }ias thisper Bver been a dry employee? EY S��NO 3. Dces this persorvfrm possess a skif� not mrmalty possessed by arry cunent ciry employee? YES NQ Eaplain tll yas aruMwn on s+poM� ahaN aM attaMto gnan shwt The problem "defecYrve sidewaik" was created because of Vee mots, defeterious subgrade materiai, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service 1'rfe limBs, chemical add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These proWems ocxur on a citywide level and must be addressed and coriected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condRion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject ro increased pedestrian injuries trom fa4ls and possble litigations. Tha communfty wili benefd from this project because ii wi{I provide safe detect free sidewafks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk caMracts are executed by private coMractors, sp it faliows that private sector pbs are created as a resuR ot this activtty. iF APPROVED: liistorieally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply siated, property owners datest assessmeMs, and despite the tacl up to one-halt ihe assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains corttroversial. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili geoerate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting +n the expenddure of larger dollar amounts in eventua{ repairs andlor replacemerrt, wait'as Eiaim payouts. � �38�8�6Ch. Cr�ntP;� MAY 111998 7TAL AMWNT OFTRAtiSACTIOH S JNDWGSOURCE 98 -ri-o668 OANCIAL WFORMATION: (EXPLAII�ry A� Y[A ytf = 4]tf�A�O B, AST = 325�000 C� Ct8 98 = 50,OOQ COST7AEYENUE BUDGETED (CipCLE ONE) ACTNRY NUMBER L:] � . �� CITY OF 5T. PAUI, COUN IL FzLE . 98-Y39 � PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi1e o. S9 082 thru 598084 Voti g Ward 5 In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: 598082 - North side W Rose Ave from Farrington St to Virginia St West side Farrington St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave and West side Farrington St Prom W Geranium Ave to W Rose Ave 598083 - North side W Rose Ave £rom Matilda St to Albemarle St South side W Rose Ave from Matilda St to Woodbridge St and West side Woodbridge St from W Rose Ave to W Maryland Ave 598084 - Both sides Virginia St from W Jessamine Ave to W Rose Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction {where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet o£ new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. 3� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Smprovement Aid. Gl That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice o£ said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereoP as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS °as Nays �nanav ✓Blakey �strom �G6leman ,�H�rris �ntry ��`iter PIIR� fCper. -�r i 31ss� JiAi1^�Q.. Adopted by Council: Date ' ` ��� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 2 1n Favor By � CJ Against Mayor Pubiic Works Sidewalks �-�-y� % y.�y GREEN SHEET No. _arry H. Lueth� 2666083 assicn ���E�M�DI,I7ECTOA Numa�rt we AUSTBEONCOUtKILAGENDA6Y{OAT� 5-20-98 Ra� auocEroiascmFt For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTMCf) fOTALt OF SIGNATUHE PAGE8 _ S _(CUP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNANfl� n ASSOCIATE Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) b MGT, SERVICES q� - u3� �CN9. SERVICE GOAiFi1SSbN CIB COMMITfEE STAFF YM%�iCW�p.OBJECTNE? PERSONAL SERYICE COMRACfS NUST ANSWER THE FOI.LON7NG QUESTIONS_ 7. Has thisp���t� rtn ever worked undel a contract for this departrnent? EY 5 NO 2. }ias thisper Bver been a dry employee? EY S��NO 3. Dces this persorvfrm possess a skif� not mrmalty possessed by arry cunent ciry employee? YES NQ Eaplain tll yas aruMwn on s+poM� ahaN aM attaMto gnan shwt The problem "defecYrve sidewaik" was created because of Vee mots, defeterious subgrade materiai, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service 1'rfe limBs, chemical add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These proWems ocxur on a citywide level and must be addressed and coriected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condRion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject ro increased pedestrian injuries trom fa4ls and possble litigations. Tha communfty wili benefd from this project because ii wi{I provide safe detect free sidewafks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk caMracts are executed by private coMractors, sp it faliows that private sector pbs are created as a resuR ot this activtty. iF APPROVED: liistorieally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply siated, property owners datest assessmeMs, and despite the tacl up to one-halt ihe assessmeM is City subsidized, it still remains corttroversial. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wili geoerate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting +n the expenddure of larger dollar amounts in eventua{ repairs andlor replacemerrt, wait'as Eiaim payouts. � �38�8�6Ch. Cr�ntP;� MAY 111998 7TAL AMWNT OFTRAtiSACTIOH S JNDWGSOURCE 98 -ri-o668 OANCIAL WFORMATION: (EXPLAII�ry A� Y[A ytf = 4]tf�A�O B, AST = 325�000 C� Ct8 98 = 50,OOQ COST7AEYENUE BUDGETED (CipCLE ONE) ACTNRY NUMBER L:] � .