Loading...
98-437LL CITY OF ST, PAUI, C U L IL N. ��/' �'J3� �� PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru S9$080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to 5 Prior Ave S9808� - Both sides Je£ferson Ave from 5 Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIALiMore than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2. � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, statinq the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS =_as Nays PlIR�L@tacil ✓Blakey� � �: a� �{��� ✓3�ostrom �`�!�^.,�,., �oleman �arris �( In Favor ✓�3 �- try :ifieiter �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�___���`�� Certified Passed by Council Se retary BY � Mayor ...�rrfct�CAUNCIL ic Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - 26&6083 GREEN isiutunwuxc:awcnuaernm�tl 5-20-9$ R� 'QeuD�Eio�f For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 "[� MAVOH(Ofi ?Al f OFSIGNATIIRE PAGES ^ 1 _(CL1P AlL LOCAi10N3 FOR SlGW1NRFa Reconstrud Sidewafk in YJard 3(See attached list} SHEET �y o. 38588 _ INITIAUDATE iNiTUUDATE R �CIT'COWJCtI ❑ cm cxeac FIN. a MGT. SERYICES DIR. ) t Council pesearch assocw� _! U � L `✓� STAFF � PEASONAL S�E COMRACTS NUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: crva sEFV�CE r,OMAlsstoM t. lias this YES NO worked under a eonvact tor this deP�ent? 2. H88 tlti3 perSOn7fxT ever b08n a sitY �P�oY�? YES NO 3. Does ihis persmfirm possess a skili not normafry possessed by arry dirtent aty employee4 YES NO Expla3n aIl yas answars on soparM� shoat aMl athehto pnsn shoBt The problem de[edive sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akemating freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems oacur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wwsen to a state where it would be �endeted unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. The cammunity wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewafk coMracts are executed by private cbntractore, so R foAows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. Nistorically, the sidewaik recronstructions have oreated negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessmerd. Simply stated, property owners detast assessmsnts, and desp8e the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiii remains controversiai. This cp[ion xrould atlow the infrasGUCture of sidewalk stock to deieriorate, which in turn, wi!! generatemorgpersortal iajury-suits,— uttimatefy resulting in the expenditure of larger doflar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Co�ct4 Research Cer�e� MAY 1119� OTALAMWNT4FTRANSAGTIONS Z� s � CO5T1REVENUEBUDGEZEO(CIRCIEONE) UNDINGSWRCE 9$'a'j � = i�QO ACfTY1TYNUMBER �98'2T�5��� NANCLLL INFOPMATION: (E%PLANJ) ♦ �"' ! �"�_'_:' _ �♦ ��B 98 = SO�oUQ i I�i� � LL CITY OF ST, PAUI, C U L IL N. ��/' �'J3� �� PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru S9$080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to 5 Prior Ave S9808� - Both sides Je£ferson Ave from 5 Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIALiMore than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2. � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, statinq the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS =_as Nays PlIR�L@tacil ✓Blakey� � �: a� �{��� ✓3�ostrom �`�!�^.,�,., �oleman �arris �( In Favor ✓�3 �- try :ifieiter �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�___���`�� Certified Passed by Council Se retary BY � Mayor ...�rrfct�CAUNCIL ic Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - 26&6083 GREEN isiutunwuxc:awcnuaernm�tl 5-20-9$ R� 'QeuD�Eio�f For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 "[� MAVOH(Ofi ?Al f OFSIGNATIIRE PAGES ^ 1 _(CL1P AlL LOCAi10N3 FOR SlGW1NRFa Reconstrud Sidewafk in YJard 3(See attached list} SHEET �y o. 38588 _ INITIAUDATE iNiTUUDATE R �CIT'COWJCtI ❑ cm cxeac FIN. a MGT. SERYICES DIR. ) t Council pesearch assocw� _! U � L `✓� STAFF � PEASONAL S�E COMRACTS NUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: crva sEFV�CE r,OMAlsstoM t. lias this YES NO worked under a eonvact tor this deP�ent? 2. H88 tlti3 perSOn7fxT ever b08n a sitY �P�oY�? YES NO 3. Does ihis persmfirm possess a skili not normafry possessed by arry dirtent aty employee4 YES NO Expla3n aIl yas answars on soparM� shoat aMl athehto pnsn shoBt The problem de[edive sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akemating freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems oacur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wwsen to a state where it would be �endeted unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. The cammunity wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewafk coMracts are executed by private cbntractore, so R foAows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. Nistorically, the sidewaik recronstructions have oreated negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessmerd. Simply stated, property owners detast assessmsnts, and desp8e the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiii remains controversiai. This cp[ion xrould atlow the infrasGUCture of sidewalk stock to deieriorate, which in turn, wi!! generatemorgpersortal iajury-suits,— uttimatefy resulting in the expenditure of larger doflar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Co�ct4 Research Cer�e� MAY 1119� OTALAMWNT4FTRANSAGTIONS Z� s � CO5T1REVENUEBUDGEZEO(CIRCIEONE) UNDINGSWRCE 9$'a'j � = i�QO ACfTY1TYNUMBER �98'2T�5��� NANCLLL INFOPMATION: (E%PLANJ) ♦ �"' ! �"�_'_:' _ �♦ ��B 98 = SO�oUQ i I�i� � LL CITY OF ST, PAUI, C U L IL N. ��/' �'J3� �� PRELIMINARY ORDER By Fi e No. S 8 79 thru S9$080 Voting Ward 3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 598079 - Both sides Jefferson Ave from S Fairview Ave to 5 Prior Ave S9808� - Both sides Je£ferson Ave from 5 Finn St to S Cretin Ave *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIALiMore than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100a of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. 2. � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ASOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City o£ Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, statinq the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS =_as Nays PlIR�L@tacil ✓Blakey� � �: a� �{��� ✓3�ostrom �`�!�^.,�,., �oleman �arris �( In Favor ✓�3 �- try :ifieiter �Against Adopted by Council: Date_�___���`�� Certified Passed by Council Se retary BY � Mayor ...�rrfct�CAUNCIL ic Works Sidewalks H. Lueth - 26&6083 GREEN isiutunwuxc:awcnuaernm�tl 5-20-9$ R� 'QeuD�Eio�f For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 "[� MAVOH(Ofi ?Al f OFSIGNATIIRE PAGES ^ 1 _(CL1P AlL LOCAi10N3 FOR SlGW1NRFa Reconstrud Sidewafk in YJard 3(See attached list} SHEET �y o. 38588 _ INITIAUDATE iNiTUUDATE R �CIT'COWJCtI ❑ cm cxeac FIN. a MGT. SERYICES DIR. ) t Council pesearch assocw� _! U � L `✓� STAFF � PEASONAL S�E COMRACTS NUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: crva sEFV�CE r,OMAlsstoM t. lias this YES NO worked under a eonvact tor this deP�ent? 2. H88 tlti3 perSOn7fxT ever b08n a sitY �P�oY�? YES NO 3. Does ihis persmfirm possess a skili not normafry possessed by arry dirtent aty employee4 YES NO Expla3n aIl yas answars on soparM� shoat aMl athehto pnsn shoBt The problem de[edive sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akemating freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems oacur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would wwsen to a state where it would be �endeted unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie litigations. The cammunity wiil benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewafk coMracts are executed by private cbntractore, so R foAows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. Nistorically, the sidewaik recronstructions have oreated negative feedback in ihe area of construction procedure and assessmerd. Simply stated, property owners detast assessmsnts, and desp8e the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiii remains controversiai. This cp[ion xrould atlow the infrasGUCture of sidewalk stock to deieriorate, which in turn, wi!! generatemorgpersortal iajury-suits,— uttimatefy resulting in the expenditure of larger doflar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. Co�ct4 Research Cer�e� MAY 1119� OTALAMWNT4FTRANSAGTIONS Z� s � CO5T1REVENUEBUDGEZEO(CIRCIEONE) UNDINGSWRCE 9$'a'j � = i�QO ACfTY1TYNUMBER �98'2T�5��� NANCLLL INFOPMATION: (E%PLANJ) ♦ �"' ! �"�_'_:' _ �♦ ��B 98 = SO�oUQ i I�i� �