98-436�
�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. /�J - y3C�
PRELIMSNARY ORDER By ���
File No. 59807 thru S98077
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowinq locations:
598075 - Both sides Sush Ave from Atlantic St to Johnson Pkwy
S98076 - Both sides N Ruth St from E Minnehaha Ave to Reaney Ave
598077 - Both sides N White Bear Ave from Fremont Ave to Margaret St
North side E Fifth St £rom N White Bear Ave to I3 Hazel St and
South side E Fourth St from Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed} - 100o of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the praperty.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RA.TES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
.�/
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
E�
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
=as / Nays
r�B nanav
�key
�strom
✓�gleman
,/�3arris
� try
eiter
P11R� Icu�rt
--�1k
...��/`i �
Adopted by Council: Date��
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
� Against
Mayor
«,� uaLe - �une �4, 1Hy�
EPAq7MENTbFFICE�OUNClL OATE INR!
'ublic Works Sidewalks 410�98
ON7ACT PERSON a PFIONE
arry H. Lueth -2665083 Nu ASyg�
I�TBEONCOUNCLLAGENDABY(DAiE) S�'LO�9$ noune�c
OFOER
For Public Hearins on 6-24-98
t OF 9iGNATURE PAGE$ _
R �GREEN SHEETO No �sss �-
�EPART4IENTOIFECTQR
CRY ATfOANhI'
BUDGETBIqECTOR
u roe tss�sru
_ �CLiP Ati LOCATIONS FOR 97GNANiik� n ASSOCIATE
Reconstruct Sidewalk & fteconsVUCt Sidewaik With 8-624 Curb & Gutter in Ward 7{See attsched list)
P{ANNINGCOMMiSSIOti _CNLL SERVICE WMMISSION
GB CpAMRTEE _
STAFF _
DISTHICTGOI#iCIL
ORTS YNiKMi CIXJNCILOBJECiNE4
CLEPK
S MGT. SEHYICES
PERSONAl3 pe E r RY10E CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:
7. Has tt»is YES � NOer worked wWer a corrtract far this departrnerrt?
2 Has fiisy�r�rm Bver baen e dty employee?
EY S NO
3. Does this personlfirm possess a ek01'wt rqrmalb� poscessed by arry curtenS eity
employee?
YES NO
E�cplain W yas �nswan on sepants shwt end attaeh te gnsn shwt
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, exlreme temperature variations, etc. These probfems oaur on a citywide level and must be
addrasssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrec[ed, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusabie and subject W increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and poss�le litigatians.
The communfty wilt benefit from this project because ft will provide sate detact fres sidewafks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are axecuted by private contractors, so ft folbws thai private sector jobs are created as a resuft oi this activity.
F{isiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the aTea of construction procedure and assessmeni.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmerrts, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, R stitl
remains controversial.
This option would allow the i�rastructure of sidewalk stocic to deieriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits,
uriimately resuking in the axpsndfture of larger doitar amounts in eventual repairs and{nr.reQlacemaat, as weii as cia'rm payavts.
C.ou�! Research Centet
MAY 111998
TOTAIAMWNlOFTRANSACipNS Z()�jfHl.2j{
FUNDINt?SOURCE . 9H�M -D668 A, PtA 98�s 676;404
FIfiANCIAt {NFOqMATpN: (E%PI,AIM B � {{S�' = 325 � 000
�� �t$ 98 s So�oD4
___._ �_....ti.--°�------
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE�
ACITVIT'NUMBER C9H -2T757-C
NO
�
�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. /�J - y3C�
PRELIMSNARY ORDER By ���
File No. 59807 thru S98077
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowinq locations:
598075 - Both sides Sush Ave from Atlantic St to Johnson Pkwy
S98076 - Both sides N Ruth St from E Minnehaha Ave to Reaney Ave
598077 - Both sides N White Bear Ave from Fremont Ave to Margaret St
North side E Fifth St £rom N White Bear Ave to I3 Hazel St and
South side E Fourth St from Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed} - 100o of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the praperty.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RA.TES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
.�/
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
E�
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
=as / Nays
r�B nanav
�key
�strom
✓�gleman
,/�3arris
� try
eiter
P11R� Icu�rt
--�1k
...��/`i �
Adopted by Council: Date��
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
� Against
Mayor
«,� uaLe - �une �4, 1Hy�
EPAq7MENTbFFICE�OUNClL OATE INR!
'ublic Works Sidewalks 410�98
ON7ACT PERSON a PFIONE
arry H. Lueth -2665083 Nu ASyg�
I�TBEONCOUNCLLAGENDABY(DAiE) S�'LO�9$ noune�c
OFOER
For Public Hearins on 6-24-98
t OF 9iGNATURE PAGE$ _
R �GREEN SHEETO No �sss �-
�EPART4IENTOIFECTQR
CRY ATfOANhI'
BUDGETBIqECTOR
u roe tss�sru
_ �CLiP Ati LOCATIONS FOR 97GNANiik� n ASSOCIATE
Reconstruct Sidewalk & fteconsVUCt Sidewaik With 8-624 Curb & Gutter in Ward 7{See attsched list)
P{ANNINGCOMMiSSIOti _CNLL SERVICE WMMISSION
GB CpAMRTEE _
STAFF _
DISTHICTGOI#iCIL
ORTS YNiKMi CIXJNCILOBJECiNE4
CLEPK
S MGT. SEHYICES
PERSONAl3 pe E r RY10E CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:
7. Has tt»is YES � NOer worked wWer a corrtract far this departrnerrt?
2 Has fiisy�r�rm Bver baen e dty employee?
EY S NO
3. Does this personlfirm possess a ek01'wt rqrmalb� poscessed by arry curtenS eity
employee?
YES NO
E�cplain W yas �nswan on sepants shwt end attaeh te gnsn shwt
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, exlreme temperature variations, etc. These probfems oaur on a citywide level and must be
addrasssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrec[ed, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusabie and subject W increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and poss�le litigatians.
The communfty wilt benefit from this project because ft will provide sate detact fres sidewafks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are axecuted by private contractors, so ft folbws thai private sector jobs are created as a resuft oi this activity.
F{isiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the aTea of construction procedure and assessmeni.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmerrts, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, R stitl
remains controversial.
This option would allow the i�rastructure of sidewalk stocic to deieriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits,
uriimately resuking in the axpsndfture of larger doitar amounts in eventual repairs and{nr.reQlacemaat, as weii as cia'rm payavts.
C.ou�! Research Centet
MAY 111998
TOTAIAMWNlOFTRANSACipNS Z()�jfHl.2j{
FUNDINt?SOURCE . 9H�M -D668 A, PtA 98�s 676;404
FIfiANCIAt {NFOqMATpN: (E%PI,AIM B � {{S�' = 325 � 000
�� �t$ 98 s So�oD4
___._ �_....ti.--°�------
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE�
ACITVIT'NUMBER C9H -2T757-C
NO
�
�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. /�J - y3C�
PRELIMSNARY ORDER By ���
File No. 59807 thru S98077
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the Pollowinq locations:
598075 - Both sides Sush Ave from Atlantic St to Johnson Pkwy
S98076 - Both sides N Ruth St from E Minnehaha Ave to Reaney Ave
598077 - Both sides N White Bear Ave from Fremont Ave to Margaret St
North side E Fifth St £rom N White Bear Ave to I3 Hazel St and
South side E Fourth St from Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a
five (5) £oot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed} - 100o of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the praperty.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(MOre than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RA.TES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
.�/
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
E�
2
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of June, 1998
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
=as / Nays
r�B nanav
�key
�strom
✓�gleman
,/�3arris
� try
eiter
P11R� Icu�rt
--�1k
...��/`i �
Adopted by Council: Date��
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
� Against
Mayor
«,� uaLe - �une �4, 1Hy�
EPAq7MENTbFFICE�OUNClL OATE INR!
'ublic Works Sidewalks 410�98
ON7ACT PERSON a PFIONE
arry H. Lueth -2665083 Nu ASyg�
I�TBEONCOUNCLLAGENDABY(DAiE) S�'LO�9$ noune�c
OFOER
For Public Hearins on 6-24-98
t OF 9iGNATURE PAGE$ _
R �GREEN SHEETO No �sss �-
�EPART4IENTOIFECTQR
CRY ATfOANhI'
BUDGETBIqECTOR
u roe tss�sru
_ �CLiP Ati LOCATIONS FOR 97GNANiik� n ASSOCIATE
Reconstruct Sidewalk & fteconsVUCt Sidewaik With 8-624 Curb & Gutter in Ward 7{See attsched list)
P{ANNINGCOMMiSSIOti _CNLL SERVICE WMMISSION
GB CpAMRTEE _
STAFF _
DISTHICTGOI#iCIL
ORTS YNiKMi CIXJNCILOBJECiNE4
CLEPK
S MGT. SEHYICES
PERSONAl3 pe E r RY10E CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEB THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:
7. Has tt»is YES � NOer worked wWer a corrtract far this departrnerrt?
2 Has fiisy�r�rm Bver baen e dty employee?
EY S NO
3. Does this personlfirm possess a ek01'wt rqrmalb� poscessed by arry curtenS eity
employee?
YES NO
E�cplain W yas �nswan on sepants shwt end attaeh te gnsn shwt
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, exlreme temperature variations, etc. These probfems oaur on a citywide level and must be
addrasssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrec[ed, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusabie and subject W increased pedestrian i�juries from falls and poss�le litigatians.
The communfty wilt benefit from this project because ft will provide sate detact fres sidewafks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are axecuted by private contractors, so ft folbws thai private sector jobs are created as a resuft oi this activity.
F{isiorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the aTea of construction procedure and assessmeni.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmerrts, and despite the tact up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, R stitl
remains controversial.
This option would allow the i�rastructure of sidewalk stocic to deieriorate, which in tum, wili generate more personal injury suits,
uriimately resuking in the axpsndfture of larger doitar amounts in eventual repairs and{nr.reQlacemaat, as weii as cia'rm payavts.
C.ou�! Research Centet
MAY 111998
TOTAIAMWNlOFTRANSACipNS Z()�jfHl.2j{
FUNDINt?SOURCE . 9H�M -D668 A, PtA 98�s 676;404
FIfiANCIAt {NFOqMATpN: (E%PI,AIM B � {{S�' = 325 � 000
�� �t$ 98 s So�oD4
___._ �_....ti.--°�------
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE�
ACITVIT'NUMBER C9H -2T757-C
NO