Loading...
98-435� � �o CITY OF ST. PAUL CO IL FI�. 98 - 5'3S � y PRELIMINARY ORDER Sy Fil No. 598072-598074 Voting Ward_5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 5980?2 - Both sides E.Jessamine Ave. from Sylvan St. to Jackson St. 598073 - Both sides Marion St. from W. Cook Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. and South side W_ Jessamine Ave. from Marion St. to Galtier St. 598074 - Soth sitles Marion St. from Eiatch Ave_ to W. Lawson Ave. *ESTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 106� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the al�ove improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of Sune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ COUNCILPERSONS Pt�Aneuen =_as / enanav Nay ,. e� 1J9p k/ � akey � �strom ; ,/Eo 1 eman �rris �In Favor � try eiter QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date �`-� �\ 1a Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Works Sidewalks For Public N MBE�fl PoR E � S�ZO-9S pOROFR on 6-24-98 V 70 GREEN � i o �vJ SHEET wo. �858� _ wmuma� wrzwmn� � a ❑cmcouNCa ❑CrtYCLERK � FM. a MG7. SERVICES DIR. (ORASSISTANT} 1❑ CWYKiI ReSEafCh PAG£4 _ 1 _�. {Cl1A ALL LOCAiIONS FOR 9GNANRk7 � ASSOCUITE Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 5{See a2tached list) ��/` ��� `6 - VAMENDATpNS: Appeaa iW a pel� (R) PEHSONAL S COMRACTS ilUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWfNG QUESTIONS: PUlNN07G CONMSSION _ CIV& SEHVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihis YES NO worked wder a aontraC[ For Ihis dePallmenY? GB COMMliTEE 2 Has ili� P�g�� evef heen a ciry �WdJ�? — YES NO STpFF 3. DOes Cus peBOn/firtn pos8e34 a s1Ull nOt fqrmally po55esSed 6y any arcent dry employee? n�siit�ciCOUNCII YES NO „�,,. � „,,.,, .. EzPlatn all yas answars en aaparata sheat and attaeh W grwn ah�at 7'he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trse roots, deieterious subgrade material, attemating freehhaw cycles, servae ti(a limits, chemical additives, e�c[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide ievel and must be addressed and corrected an an annual basis. LeR uncorrected, the sidewalk canditan would worsen to a state where it w4uld be repdered unusable and subject t4 increased pedestriart injuries from falis and pouible litigations, The community wiil benefrt from ihis project because it wQl provide sate deteci frea sidewalks fior its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed 6y private contractors, so it follows that private sector jcbs are created as a resuk ot this activity, 7F MPHOYED: Historically, tfie sidewalk reconstructions have areated negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to pne•half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remains controversial. This option would allaw the irrfrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl generate more personai injury suits, u8imately resufting in tha expenditure ot farger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs andJOr repla,cemeni,_as�vellas.claim payouis. --- Cou�x�l Reseasch Cer�er TOtAIAMOUNCOFTRqNSACfIONS � 7t5,005.04 FUNDN16SOl78CE 98�*}�^Q66$ � PtA 9$ ���a 00� vnaaNCUawvoa�wTaH:�xaumn B.. AST � S�OdO c; cts 98 s 5a,000 MAY 11 �9� COSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO ACRYITY NUMBER � � �o CITY OF ST. PAUL CO IL FI�. 98 - 5'3S � y PRELIMINARY ORDER Sy Fil No. 598072-598074 Voting Ward_5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 5980?2 - Both sides E.Jessamine Ave. from Sylvan St. to Jackson St. 598073 - Both sides Marion St. from W. Cook Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. and South side W_ Jessamine Ave. from Marion St. to Galtier St. 598074 - Soth sitles Marion St. from Eiatch Ave_ to W. Lawson Ave. *ESTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 106� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the al�ove improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of Sune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ COUNCILPERSONS Pt�Aneuen =_as / enanav Nay ,. e� 1J9p k/ � akey � �strom ; ,/Eo 1 eman �rris �In Favor � try eiter QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date �`-� �\ 1a Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Works Sidewalks For Public N MBE�fl PoR E � S�ZO-9S pOROFR on 6-24-98 V 70 GREEN � i o �vJ SHEET wo. �858� _ wmuma� wrzwmn� � a ❑cmcouNCa ❑CrtYCLERK � FM. a MG7. SERVICES DIR. (ORASSISTANT} 1❑ CWYKiI ReSEafCh PAG£4 _ 1 _�. {Cl1A ALL LOCAiIONS FOR 9GNANRk7 � ASSOCUITE Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 5{See a2tached list) ��/` ��� `6 - VAMENDATpNS: Appeaa iW a pel� (R) PEHSONAL S COMRACTS ilUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWfNG QUESTIONS: PUlNN07G CONMSSION _ CIV& SEHVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihis YES NO worked wder a aontraC[ For Ihis dePallmenY? GB COMMliTEE 2 Has ili� P�g�� evef heen a ciry �WdJ�? — YES NO STpFF 3. DOes Cus peBOn/firtn pos8e34 a s1Ull nOt fqrmally po55esSed 6y any arcent dry employee? n�siit�ciCOUNCII YES NO „�,,. � „,,.,, .. EzPlatn all yas answars en aaparata sheat and attaeh W grwn ah�at 7'he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trse roots, deieterious subgrade material, attemating freehhaw cycles, servae ti(a limits, chemical additives, e�c[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide ievel and must be addressed and corrected an an annual basis. LeR uncorrected, the sidewalk canditan would worsen to a state where it w4uld be repdered unusable and subject t4 increased pedestriart injuries from falis and pouible litigations, The community wiil benefrt from ihis project because it wQl provide sate deteci frea sidewalks fior its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed 6y private contractors, so it follows that private sector jcbs are created as a resuk ot this activity, 7F MPHOYED: Historically, tfie sidewalk reconstructions have areated negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to pne•half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remains controversial. This option would allaw the irrfrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl generate more personai injury suits, u8imately resufting in tha expenditure ot farger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs andJOr repla,cemeni,_as�vellas.claim payouis. --- Cou�x�l Reseasch Cer�er TOtAIAMOUNCOFTRqNSACfIONS � 7t5,005.04 FUNDN16SOl78CE 98�*}�^Q66$ � PtA 9$ ���a 00� vnaaNCUawvoa�wTaH:�xaumn B.. AST � S�OdO c; cts 98 s 5a,000 MAY 11 �9� COSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO ACRYITY NUMBER � � �o CITY OF ST. PAUL CO IL FI�. 98 - 5'3S � y PRELIMINARY ORDER Sy Fil No. 598072-598074 Voting Ward_5 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstructioa at the followiag locations: 5980?2 - Both sides E.Jessamine Ave. from Sylvan St. to Jackson St. 598073 - Both sides Marion St. from W. Cook Ave. to W. Jessamine Ave. and South side W_ Jessamine Ave. from Marion St. to Galtier St. 598074 - Soth sitles Marion St. from Eiatch Ave_ to W. Lawson Ave. *ESTIMATfiD CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per £ront foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures�, NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 106� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the al�ove improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of Sune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ COUNCILPERSONS Pt�Aneuen =_as / enanav Nay ,. e� 1J9p k/ � akey � �strom ; ,/Eo 1 eman �rris �In Favor � try eiter QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date �`-� �\ 1a Certi£ied Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor Works Sidewalks For Public N MBE�fl PoR E � S�ZO-9S pOROFR on 6-24-98 V 70 GREEN � i o �vJ SHEET wo. �858� _ wmuma� wrzwmn� � a ❑cmcouNCa ❑CrtYCLERK � FM. a MG7. SERVICES DIR. (ORASSISTANT} 1❑ CWYKiI ReSEafCh PAG£4 _ 1 _�. {Cl1A ALL LOCAiIONS FOR 9GNANRk7 � ASSOCUITE Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 5{See a2tached list) ��/` ��� `6 - VAMENDATpNS: Appeaa iW a pel� (R) PEHSONAL S COMRACTS ilUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWfNG QUESTIONS: PUlNN07G CONMSSION _ CIV& SEHVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihis YES NO worked wder a aontraC[ For Ihis dePallmenY? GB COMMliTEE 2 Has ili� P�g�� evef heen a ciry �WdJ�? — YES NO STpFF 3. DOes Cus peBOn/firtn pos8e34 a s1Ull nOt fqrmally po55esSed 6y any arcent dry employee? n�siit�ciCOUNCII YES NO „�,,. � „,,.,, .. EzPlatn all yas answars en aaparata sheat and attaeh W grwn ah�at 7'he problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trse roots, deieterious subgrade material, attemating freehhaw cycles, servae ti(a limits, chemical additives, e�c[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a crtywide ievel and must be addressed and corrected an an annual basis. LeR uncorrected, the sidewalk canditan would worsen to a state where it w4uld be repdered unusable and subject t4 increased pedestriart injuries from falis and pouible litigations, The community wiil benefrt from ihis project because it wQl provide sate deteci frea sidewalks fior its many cftizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed 6y private contractors, so it follows that private sector jcbs are created as a resuk ot this activity, 7F MPHOYED: Historically, tfie sidewalk reconstructions have areated negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to pne•half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill remains controversial. This option would allaw the irrfrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl generate more personai injury suits, u8imately resufting in tha expenditure ot farger doliar amounts in eventuai repairs andJOr repla,cemeni,_as�vellas.claim payouis. --- Cou�x�l Reseasch Cer�er TOtAIAMOUNCOFTRqNSACfIONS � 7t5,005.04 FUNDN16SOl78CE 98�*}�^Q66$ � PtA 9$ ���a 00� vnaaNCUawvoa�wTaH:�xaumn B.. AST � S�OdO c; cts 98 s 5a,000 MAY 11 �9� COSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO ACRYITY NUMBER