Loading...
98-434L� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 7 O 7� PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o S5 069 t ru 598070 Voti q ard 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recanstruction at the folloming locations: S98069 - Both sides Fry St £rom Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave 598�70 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howe11 St to N Prior Ave 598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES t�ESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) - 57.65 per £ront foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o� actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul havinq received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of .Tune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Huilding in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS as Nays �enanav t/glakey �strom � l eman vF3arris r�antry �iter �� Adopted by Council: Date � 1 �� J���� 3�g�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 'S1fFT b � In Favor Sy �Against Mayor E �a�ing llate - 3une 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 EPXNTMEMNFFICE/COUNGIL DA7EINITIA7EU GREEN SHEET 'ublic Works Sidewalks 4-1�-98 wmumas DMACT PEHSON f PIiONE OWAPTAIEM DIflECTOfi arry H. Lueih - 266-6083 �cN crtr atrow�v NUMBERFOfl USTBE�NCOUN(:kAGEN0A8Y(DAAIE) 5-20-98 R� awcer�iuECmw For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(OR0.SS4STMfT) DiAI t OF 91GNANPE PAGES _ 1 __ tCIJP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUA� 1 1 ASSOCIA7E Reconstruct Sidewapc in Ward 4(See ffitached Ctst) COMYRTfE ICTCOiNJCiL YMICNCWNCk00JECTNE? �Np 38584 � ItiR1AUDATE � cm murica cm aFwc Q F9i. E NGT. SEiiVK�S D1R VEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTflACTS MtlST ATiSWER THE FOLLOWITiG 9UESTIONS: 1. Nas lhis pefs � NO work9d uMef a cMUaC4 for Nis deP�ent7 YE & Has ihis u•m ever been a eiry emW�Yee? EY 5 NO 3. Does ihis peraon7firm possess a nk�71 mt normalty pnssesseA by any wrcent dry empioyee? YES NO Fspietn an yas �nswars oa sapsrata shwt eni maeh to gr.an s�w� 'fhe pmblem "defective sidewalk" was created because of irse roats, deteterious su6grade materiat, afternating freefthaw cycles, service life fimits, chemical additives, extreme tempsrature variations, etc. Tfiese problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed a�d corrected on an a�nual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk cwnditicn wou�d worsen to a state whera it wauid be rendered unusable and subjed to inaeased pedestrian injurias from falls and possibfe litigations. The community wil! benefB from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks tar Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private comractors, so it foHows that private sedor jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, ft stili remains controversial. This option wouid a11ow the infrastructure of sidewafk stoc{c to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mora personat injury suits, uftimately resuiting ia the expenditure ot larger dotiar amounts in eventual repairs an3ioi replacemen'f, as wetl as daim payouts. CouncR Research Center MAY 111998 YTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 12 5'�6 7G - COSTiNEVENUEHU INDWGSWRCE 98-�f-4668 A� PhA 98�= 6784000 ACRVfTYNUMBER waciu�NKOaMarar�:�xauu�f $; AST � 325,000 � e; crs y8 = so,000 ONE) ( YES J �+o L� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 7 O 7� PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o S5 069 t ru 598070 Voti q ard 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recanstruction at the folloming locations: S98069 - Both sides Fry St £rom Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave 598�70 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howe11 St to N Prior Ave 598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES t�ESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) - 57.65 per £ront foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o� actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul havinq received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of .Tune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Huilding in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS as Nays �enanav t/glakey �strom � l eman vF3arris r�antry �iter �� Adopted by Council: Date � 1 �� J���� 3�g�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 'S1fFT b � In Favor Sy �Against Mayor E �a�ing llate - 3une 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 EPXNTMEMNFFICE/COUNGIL DA7EINITIA7EU GREEN SHEET 'ublic Works Sidewalks 4-1�-98 wmumas DMACT PEHSON f PIiONE OWAPTAIEM DIflECTOfi arry H. Lueih - 266-6083 �cN crtr atrow�v NUMBERFOfl USTBE�NCOUN(:kAGEN0A8Y(DAAIE) 5-20-98 R� awcer�iuECmw For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(OR0.SS4STMfT) DiAI t OF 91GNANPE PAGES _ 1 __ tCIJP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUA� 1 1 ASSOCIA7E Reconstruct Sidewapc in Ward 4(See ffitached Ctst) COMYRTfE ICTCOiNJCiL YMICNCWNCk00JECTNE? �Np 38584 � ItiR1AUDATE � cm murica cm aFwc Q F9i. E NGT. SEiiVK�S D1R VEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTflACTS MtlST ATiSWER THE FOLLOWITiG 9UESTIONS: 1. Nas lhis pefs � NO work9d uMef a cMUaC4 for Nis deP�ent7 YE & Has ihis u•m ever been a eiry emW�Yee? EY 5 NO 3. Does ihis peraon7firm possess a nk�71 mt normalty pnssesseA by any wrcent dry empioyee? YES NO Fspietn an yas �nswars oa sapsrata shwt eni maeh to gr.an s�w� 'fhe pmblem "defective sidewalk" was created because of irse roats, deteterious su6grade materiat, afternating freefthaw cycles, service life fimits, chemical additives, extreme tempsrature variations, etc. Tfiese problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed a�d corrected on an a�nual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk cwnditicn wou�d worsen to a state whera it wauid be rendered unusable and subjed to inaeased pedestrian injurias from falls and possibfe litigations. The community wil! benefB from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks tar Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private comractors, so it foHows that private sedor jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, ft stili remains controversial. This option wouid a11ow the infrastructure of sidewafk stoc{c to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mora personat injury suits, uftimately resuiting ia the expenditure ot larger dotiar amounts in eventual repairs an3ioi replacemen'f, as wetl as daim payouts. CouncR Research Center MAY 111998 YTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 12 5'�6 7G - COSTiNEVENUEHU INDWGSWRCE 98-�f-4668 A� PhA 98�= 6784000 ACRVfTYNUMBER waciu�NKOaMarar�:�xauu�f $; AST � 325,000 � e; crs y8 = so,000 ONE) ( YES J �+o L� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. 7 O 7� PRELIMINARY ORDER By File o S5 069 t ru 598070 Voti q ard 4 In the Matter of sidewalk recanstruction at the folloming locations: S98069 - Both sides Fry St £rom Englewood Ave to Hubbard Ave 598�70 - Both sides Marshall Ave from N Howe11 St to N Prior Ave 598071 - Both sides N Prior Ave from Dayton Ave to Marshall Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES t�ESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) - 57.65 per £ront foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100°s of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 Peet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� o� actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul havinq received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. � That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of .Tune, 1998 at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Huilding in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place oP hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS as Nays �enanav t/glakey �strom � l eman vF3arris r�antry �iter �� Adopted by Council: Date � 1 �� J���� 3�g�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary 'S1fFT b � In Favor Sy �Against Mayor E �a�ing llate - 3une 24, 1998 RE 5-8-98 EPXNTMEMNFFICE/COUNGIL DA7EINITIA7EU GREEN SHEET 'ublic Works Sidewalks 4-1�-98 wmumas DMACT PEHSON f PIiONE OWAPTAIEM DIflECTOfi arry H. Lueih - 266-6083 �cN crtr atrow�v NUMBERFOfl USTBE�NCOUN(:kAGEN0A8Y(DAAIE) 5-20-98 R� awcer�iuECmw For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(OR0.SS4STMfT) DiAI t OF 91GNANPE PAGES _ 1 __ tCIJP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUA� 1 1 ASSOCIA7E Reconstruct Sidewapc in Ward 4(See ffitached Ctst) COMYRTfE ICTCOiNJCiL YMICNCWNCk00JECTNE? �Np 38584 � ItiR1AUDATE � cm murica cm aFwc Q F9i. E NGT. SEiiVK�S D1R VEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTflACTS MtlST ATiSWER THE FOLLOWITiG 9UESTIONS: 1. Nas lhis pefs � NO work9d uMef a cMUaC4 for Nis deP�ent7 YE & Has ihis u•m ever been a eiry emW�Yee? EY 5 NO 3. Does ihis peraon7firm possess a nk�71 mt normalty pnssesseA by any wrcent dry empioyee? YES NO Fspietn an yas �nswars oa sapsrata shwt eni maeh to gr.an s�w� 'fhe pmblem "defective sidewalk" was created because of irse roats, deteterious su6grade materiat, afternating freefthaw cycles, service life fimits, chemical additives, extreme tempsrature variations, etc. Tfiese problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed a�d corrected on an a�nual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk cwnditicn wou�d worsen to a state whera it wauid be rendered unusable and subjed to inaeased pedestrian injurias from falls and possibfe litigations. The community wil! benefB from this project because it will provide safe detect tree sidewalks tar Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private comractors, so it foHows that private sedor jobs are created as a resuft of this adivity. IF APPROVED: Historicaily, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, ft stili remains controversial. This option wouid a11ow the infrastructure of sidewafk stoc{c to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate mora personat injury suits, uftimately resuiting ia the expenditure ot larger dotiar amounts in eventual repairs an3ioi replacemen'f, as wetl as daim payouts. CouncR Research Center MAY 111998 YTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS 12 5'�6 7G - COSTiNEVENUEHU INDWGSWRCE 98-�f-4668 A� PhA 98�= 6784000 ACRVfTYNUMBER waciu�NKOaMarar�:�xauu�f $; AST � 325,000 � e; crs y8 = so,000 ONE) ( YES J �+o