98-432- �L
� c 27
CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I 0. �a � y.,3Z
PREI,IMINARY ORDER By
Fi e No. O51 thru 598064
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations:
S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St
598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave
598053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and
West side S Hamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave.
S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline
598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft
East of S Syndicate St.
S9S056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace Ave to Juliet Ave
598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and
West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave
598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave
598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St
598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and
South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St
598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave
598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave
S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at
657 S Hamline Ave only
S98�64 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
�/gFY3Z
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot Eor a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
�
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th daq nf�T�ine_ 199R
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Buiiding in the City of Saint Pau1.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�Benanav
�lakey
�Bostrom
�/Eo 1 eman
�rris
;/�antry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date_���,�q�'
�
Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary
�In Favor By /r
�Against
Mayor
PIIRI tFUcn
J�131998
Works Sidewalks
���1�'��-'�i ���
�wincnnwunc:i�u;enunnisunit) 5-20-98
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98
-�-y� y� - 5�3Z
GREEN SHEET No. 3sss�
iNmawa� wrzuuma�
DEPAATA7EMDIRECfOR �CT'COUNCIL
CRY ATiOANEY CRY CIERK
BUOGET�IRECTOR � Fp1.6 MGT. SERYICES OIR
AIAYOR(ORI4SSLMAHT) � Cou(1dl RESE2(C!i
_ 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOCA710q5 FOH 91GNANRE! n ASSOCWTE �L2Qi�,RIfaENTAL ACCOUNiAM
Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward 3(See ariacfied iist)
«
CbbiMfiTEE
_ CNq. SEFVK:E COMMISSION
WHICH COf 1NCIL 08JECTNE7
PERSONAL SERYfCE CONTRACTS kUST ANSWER SNE FOLLOW{NG OtlEST{ONS:
�. Has Uiis rm ever wnrked under a comratt fa this deparunenY?
2 Has this petsonftirm O er hean e dty emWoYeea
Y
s. Ooes Nis persontfirm pessess a sWlt not �rormaly posseszed by arry current ag
employee?
YES NO
F�[plain all yaa answera nn saparata 8Fw� 8M attach to gnsn ahaet
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiat, aftemating free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chem'ical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levei and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unoorrected, the sidewalk cond8ian would worsen to a state where it wouid be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community wiii 6enefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. TNe sidewafk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it folbws that private sector jobs are created as a resutt nf this activity.
Hisioricafly, the sidewalk raconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construciion procedure and assessment.
Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
PAOV :
--- ---____-- -
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiil generata more personai injury suits,
uttimately resufting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in eventuaf�repairs ar�dlor�replacement as claim payouts.
CatmcA Researcf� C�ter
MAY 11 i99$
70TAlAMGUNTOFTRANSACT10N5 77,907.88
FUNDINGSOIJRCE 98-M-06b8 A, PtA 98 m 678,000
FNJANCW,MFORMATION:(EXPtAIt� B� A�"r a 3't
C Ct6 9$ � 50,008
CQSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE)
ACITVITYNUMBER t98-2T757-0
::7
<'
- �L
� c 27
CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I 0. �a � y.,3Z
PREI,IMINARY ORDER By
Fi e No. O51 thru 598064
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations:
S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St
598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave
598053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and
West side S Hamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave.
S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline
598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft
East of S Syndicate St.
S9S056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace Ave to Juliet Ave
598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and
West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave
598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave
598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St
598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and
South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St
598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave
598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave
S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at
657 S Hamline Ave only
S98�64 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
�/gFY3Z
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot Eor a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
�
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th daq nf�T�ine_ 199R
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Buiiding in the City of Saint Pau1.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�Benanav
�lakey
�Bostrom
�/Eo 1 eman
�rris
;/�antry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date_���,�q�'
�
Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary
�In Favor By /r
�Against
Mayor
PIIRI tFUcn
J�131998
Works Sidewalks
���1�'��-'�i ���
�wincnnwunc:i�u;enunnisunit) 5-20-98
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98
-�-y� y� - 5�3Z
GREEN SHEET No. 3sss�
iNmawa� wrzuuma�
DEPAATA7EMDIRECfOR �CT'COUNCIL
CRY ATiOANEY CRY CIERK
BUOGET�IRECTOR � Fp1.6 MGT. SERYICES OIR
AIAYOR(ORI4SSLMAHT) � Cou(1dl RESE2(C!i
_ 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOCA710q5 FOH 91GNANRE! n ASSOCWTE �L2Qi�,RIfaENTAL ACCOUNiAM
Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward 3(See ariacfied iist)
«
CbbiMfiTEE
_ CNq. SEFVK:E COMMISSION
WHICH COf 1NCIL 08JECTNE7
PERSONAL SERYfCE CONTRACTS kUST ANSWER SNE FOLLOW{NG OtlEST{ONS:
�. Has Uiis rm ever wnrked under a comratt fa this deparunenY?
2 Has this petsonftirm O er hean e dty emWoYeea
Y
s. Ooes Nis persontfirm pessess a sWlt not �rormaly posseszed by arry current ag
employee?
YES NO
F�[plain all yaa answera nn saparata 8Fw� 8M attach to gnsn ahaet
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiat, aftemating free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chem'ical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levei and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unoorrected, the sidewalk cond8ian would worsen to a state where it wouid be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community wiii 6enefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. TNe sidewafk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it folbws that private sector jobs are created as a resutt nf this activity.
Hisioricafly, the sidewalk raconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construciion procedure and assessment.
Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
PAOV :
--- ---____-- -
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiil generata more personai injury suits,
uttimately resufting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in eventuaf�repairs ar�dlor�replacement as claim payouts.
CatmcA Researcf� C�ter
MAY 11 i99$
70TAlAMGUNTOFTRANSACT10N5 77,907.88
FUNDINGSOIJRCE 98-M-06b8 A, PtA 98 m 678,000
FNJANCW,MFORMATION:(EXPtAIt� B� A�"r a 3't
C Ct6 9$ � 50,008
CQSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE)
ACITVITYNUMBER t98-2T757-0
::7
<'
- �L
� c 27
CITY OF ST. PAUL COU I I 0. �a � y.,3Z
PREI,IMINARY ORDER By
Fi e No. O51 thru 598064
Voting Ward 3
In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at the £ollowing locations:
S98051 - Both sides Goodrich Avenue from S Hamline Ave to S Syndicate St
598052 - Both sides S Hamline Avenue from James Ave to Randolph Ave
598053 - East side S Hamline Ave from Watson Ave to Bayard Ave and
West side S Hamline Ave from Hartford Ave to Bayard Ave.
S98054 - Both sides James Ave from S Albert to S Hamline
598055 - Both sides Lincoln Ave from S Syndicate St to approximately 360 ft
East of S Syndicate St.
S9S056 - Both sides Macalester St from Palace Ave to Juliet Ave
598057 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Snelling Ave to S Saratoga St and
West side S Saratoga St from Fairmount Ave to Osceola Ave
598058 - Both sides S Pascal St from Palace Ave to Randolph Ave
598059 - Both sides St Clair Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St
598060 - North side St Clair Ave from S Saratoga St to S Pascal St and
South side St Clair Ave from Warwick St to S Pascal St
598061 - Both sides S Saratoga St from Lincoln Ave to Goodrich Ave
598062 - Both sides Sargent Ave from S Albert St to S Hamline Ave
S98063 - South side Scheffer Ave from S Hamline Ave to West 105 ft at
657 S Hamline Ave only
S98�64 - Both sides Stanford Ave from S Albert St to S Pascal St.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
�/gFY3Z
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot Eor a
five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.42 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.62 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
�
E
3
That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives,
and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction
rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th daq nf�T�ine_ 199R
at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Buiiding in the City of Saint Pau1.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�Benanav
�lakey
�Bostrom
�/Eo 1 eman
�rris
;/�antry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date_���,�q�'
�
Certi£ied Passed by Council cretary
�In Favor By /r
�Against
Mayor
PIIRI tFUcn
J�131998
Works Sidewalks
���1�'��-'�i ���
�wincnnwunc:i�u;enunnisunit) 5-20-98
For Public Hearing on 6-24-98
-�-y� y� - 5�3Z
GREEN SHEET No. 3sss�
iNmawa� wrzuuma�
DEPAATA7EMDIRECfOR �CT'COUNCIL
CRY ATiOANEY CRY CIERK
BUOGET�IRECTOR � Fp1.6 MGT. SERYICES OIR
AIAYOR(ORI4SSLMAHT) � Cou(1dl RESE2(C!i
_ 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOCA710q5 FOH 91GNANRE! n ASSOCWTE �L2Qi�,RIfaENTAL ACCOUNiAM
Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward 3(See ariacfied iist)
«
CbbiMfiTEE
_ CNq. SEFVK:E COMMISSION
WHICH COf 1NCIL 08JECTNE7
PERSONAL SERYfCE CONTRACTS kUST ANSWER SNE FOLLOW{NG OtlEST{ONS:
�. Has Uiis rm ever wnrked under a comratt fa this deparunenY?
2 Has this petsonftirm O er hean e dty emWoYeea
Y
s. Ooes Nis persontfirm pessess a sWlt not �rormaly posseszed by arry current ag
employee?
YES NO
F�[plain all yaa answera nn saparata 8Fw� 8M attach to gnsn ahaet
The problem "defective sidewalk' was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiat, aftemating free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chem'ical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levei and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left unoorrected, the sidewalk cond8ian would worsen to a state where it wouid be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community wiii 6enefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. TNe sidewafk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it folbws that private sector jobs are created as a resutt nf this activity.
Hisioricafly, the sidewalk raconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construciion procedure and assessment.
Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
PAOV :
--- ---____-- -
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiil generata more personai injury suits,
uttimately resufting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in eventuaf�repairs ar�dlor�replacement as claim payouts.
CatmcA Researcf� C�ter
MAY 11 i99$
70TAlAMGUNTOFTRANSACT10N5 77,907.88
FUNDINGSOIJRCE 98-M-06b8 A, PtA 98 m 678,000
FNJANCW,MFORMATION:(EXPtAIt� B� A�"r a 3't
C Ct6 9$ � 50,008
CQSTlREYENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE)
ACITVITYNUMBER t98-2T757-0
::7
<'